So we gonna ignore kill zone 3 running at sub 30fps with jaggies
And Halo 3 (Xbox Flagship title) didn't even run in native HD.
So we gonna ignore kill zone 3 running at sub 30fps with jaggies
this is just cornyHow many frames does gears use to get into cover. Like 5?
?
And Halo 3 (Xbox Flagship title) didn't even run in native HD.
And Halo 3 (Xbox Flagship title) didn't even run in native HD.
this is just corny
they know that consistent framerate >>>
Arguing frames is not friendly.
they're incredibly important when it comes to shooters and racers
Only to people who are demonically obsessed with their kill death ratio. The kind of people who scream at their televisions and throw their property across the living room because they died, in a video game.
Its so demonic, friend.
you're one of the biggest proponents of the ps3 being this incredible console that is held back by the xbox yet you're fine playing in messy ass framerates
I dont know what bad frame rate is friend. The last time i played a game with a noticeably bad framerate was when i played destroy all humans and saints row. You're doing too much. I dont see what you see and i have both systems. I dont see framerate issues on either system with my eyes. I do see Sub HD graphics in a systems flagship exclusive though. A billion dollar company cant even get their own games in HD. Microsoft has a lot of work to do if they want to catch up to the quality of ps3.
Your eyes are fukked of you can't see the different between..let's say....cod/NBA 2k vs. Killzone/gears/halo 2 etc.
I live for that smoothness....that's why my body is ready for this next gen
....I might set rose pedals on my TV stand before heading out to cop. One of these systems gone get this thumb in 2013!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
No. But the nature of games and technology dictates that games released a couple year ago won't stand up to games released more recently. Some games are timeless classics but people are still willing to pay for those therefore you will never get them for free on ps plus.
Nonsense. Please add a "I think" to the end of your sentence.
Some things are only offered to gold members like early demos, and some betas. But other betas are offered for free, a couple times out of the year 1 month gold memberships are free. All demos are free and sometimes full games are offered to all XBL members for free.
Yea every once in a blue moon.
Honestly how much of that would you have even considered purchasing if it wasn't free? At least if you go buy the games you can return them for credit torward other games, or if you don't like them you can return them for full reimbursement. With ps plus you get what they give you whether you like it or not.
Not true because a lot of the "free" games are digital only like Outland and Scott Pilgrim.
What AAA title have you received from being a member of ps plus?
LittlebigPlanet 2, Infamous 2, Uncharted Golden Abyss, Gravity Rush, Outland, The Walking Dead, Sly Cooper 1 , Castlevania SOTN, Pacman DX, and a lot more I can't remember off the top. The Vita PSN+ deals were crazy good as the games just came out months ago and it was already given away for free. Now I know you're just going to say those games are ass and aren't AAA or w/e.
A fanboy couldn't admit that, they'ed just say "Xbox/PSX is better "
Which you are doing.
so why are you comparing it to XBL? Regular members of XBL get free content without paying for a subscription so still XBL>PSN
Again what content was given for free on XBL that's better than the catalog of games given free by PSN plus?
And Halo 3 (Xbox Flagship title) didn't even run in native HD.
Is uncharted 1 as good as 3? Games get better every year. That's why you have people saying "we haven't reached the full potential of the ps3 yet" as game developers get more familiar with the systems they make better games. It's just natural progression.Nonsense. Please add a "I think" to the end of your sentence.
Getting a game I don't want for free every once in a while beets getting a bunch of games I don't want that I have to pay for.Yea every once in a blue moon.
Good games but they are old and cheap at GameStop right now. As for the downloadable games I wouldn't call those AAA titles. If they were giving out journey or something then we could talk.LittlebigPlanet 2, Infamous 2, Uncharted Golden Abyss, Gravity Rush, Outland, The Walking Dead, Sly Cooper 1 , Castlevania SOTN, Pacman DX, and a lot more I can't remember off the top. The Vita PSN+ deals were crazy good as the games just came out months ago and it was already given away for free. Now I know you're just going to say those games are ass and aren't AAA or w/e.
I've said plenty of times that I like the ps3 and I enjoy playing it. But the fact stands that in any measurable way(sales, reviews, market share) the Xbox won this generation.Which you are doing.
Probably none, but they were free and none of the games(outside a few on PSN) are very desirable to me.Again what content was given for free on XBL that's better than the catalog of games given free by PSN plus?
No but GameStop offers free game trials for a weekAlso does XBL offer 1 hour game trials?? I'm not talking about a demo but a full game trial?? There's a bunch of games on PSN right now I can try for one hour, earn trophies and then decide if I want to buy later on.
I'm not downplaying anything. In my opinion free games that I should have played year ago aren't worth any amount of money, but that's just meYou're really trying to downplay the strengths of PSN Plus I see. The music unlimited app was originally $50 but with PSN plus I was able to snag it for $12. That was a steal that you just can't try to spin.
At the end of the day PSN Plus is a still "optional" and isn't mandatory to access online.
who gives a fukk bunch of lames in here arguing what system is better