It's not about "playing politics" but understanding that this is a CLASS ISSUE.
Vivek and Musk and Thiel and Zuckerberg and Bezos and sever other tech billionaires have gone
out of their way to spend a great deal of money on manipulating our politicians.
Peter Thiel is THE MOST egregious in that his hard work literally got him a VP.
He's a pretty blatant and open fascist.
There's also Musk who's political affiliations switch with the wind and he also have no fukking
problem openly influencing our politicians through his gargantuan wealth.
People to busy trying to "Own the magats" to ignore that money in our politics is a huge bipartisan
issue and TECH in particular has an outsized influence on our government. The H1B Visa thing is just the tip
of the iceberg but you need to understand that
Peter Theil, Lucky Palmer and Sam Altman are all fukking buddies.
Their goal is to rush to general artificial intelligence.
The belief is that we're already here technologically we simply DO NOT have the power to power a machine that'll
bring us there and get us over the edge.
The bet is that disrupting the flow of chips to China and bolstering domestic manufacturing means we'll
maintain our technological edge:
en.wikipedia.org
They know we're falling behind technologically, China due to being a socialist government is graduating hundreds of thousands
of engineers every fukking year and they're PUTTING THEM WORK on huge government works projects, allowing to enter industry,
spurring the growth of private enterprise etc.
Due to the nature of how our educational system works, we can't match the workforce they're creating.
This is where H1B comes in and the desire to get as many indians and other asians here as fast as humanly possible, including the chinese
Also, our economy isn't doing nearly as well as China's so one way to artifically bolster our economy is to mimic the socialist approach while still
staying capitalist, so they throw out fukking shyt tons of government contracts to private enterprise.
You still get your "Planned economy" but you (supposedly) get the benefits of a "market".