I wonder how many nikkas gonna defend that clown John Lewis?
I'm gonna post this now that I'm on page 1 and see how many capes flap by the time I get to page 17
You really coming for a legend because of one tweet? Really bruh...
I wonder how many nikkas gonna defend that clown John Lewis?
I'm gonna post this now that I'm on page 1 and see how many capes flap by the time I get to page 17
You really coming for a legend because of one tweet? Really bruh...
What are you doing for black people in your community that gives you the leadway to discredit a civil rights legend?
Doubtful.
Dems may get more votes (and often do) but the districts are too gerrymandered to the GOPs advantage for it to matter much. Certainly not enough for the Dems to have a realistic chance of taking anything back anything in 2018.
John Lewis understands that hate is not the answer. I can't see nothing wrong with that. He is basically saying what any enlightened person would say, he understands that there are people falling victim to the ego ridden idea of whites being superior, you don't break this illusion by being violent back.
This doesn't mean though that violence as a revolt can't be understood from a psychological perspective, it means that it shouldn't be encouraged, that's all. John Lewis handling of the police is what an enlightened man would do, wether your mind would accept it or not.
How could you expect Obama to reduce the racial wealth gap during his 8 year presidency? It's unfair metric to use over an 8 year period because the wealth gap has been created over generations of discriminatory laws and economic policies. No president can single handily reduce this during 2 terms especially without his or her party having control of the other 2 braches of government. Obama ain't a saint but don't place burdens on his legacy that he had neither the tools nor the time to alleviate.
Implying that his tweet makes him a c00nHow did I discredit him?
HE posted the tweet
What are you doing for black people in your community that gives you the leadway to discredit a civil rights legend?
I don't want to say this...but this election really proved how DESPERATE the black community is in America. To even support this man who has actual Neo-Nazis like Richard Spencer in his cabinet, you have to be completely fukking brainded.
I wonder how many nikkas gonna defend that clown John Lewis?
I'm gonna post this now that I'm on page 1 and see how many capes flap by the time I get to page 17
From the very outset of his administration, Barack Obama has shown a propensity to value the corporatism at heart of the neoliberal ideology over any redistributive efforts towards the most at-risk populations, including African-Americans. He campaigned as a proto-Bernie populist progressive who would fight for homeowners and unions and the working class, and then immediately did an about face when sworn into office by firing the architects of his campaign's economic messaging and hiring a grip of corporate lackeys to be his closest economic advisors. And in a move foreshadowing the state of the Democratic Party throughout his administration, he abandoned his OFA grassroots organization and essentially let it die. The policies he ended up actually proposing were timid and superficial, not designed to enact structural change except to ensure that the banks that committed illegal, fraudulent activities were given primacy and protected from the fallout of the financial crisis, necessarily at the expense of the homeowner class. Property is the foundation of wealth-building. The black population was disproportionately targeted and harmed by the predatory lending that caused the foreclosure crisis. Obama's hesitancy to rectify this injustice was perhaps the single largest contributor to the widening of the racial wealth gap during this decade. It would of course be absurd to blame Obama for the existence of the racial wealth gap, but he holds responsibility for its expansion during his terms, because the policies he chose to support did exactly that.How could you expect Obama to reduce the racial wealth gap during his 8 year presidency? It's unfair metric to use over an 8 year period because the wealth gap has been created over generations of discriminatory laws and economic policies. No president can single handily reduce this during 2 terms especially without his or her party having control of the other 2 braches of government. Obama ain't a saint but don't place burdens on his legacy that he had neither the tools nor the time to alleviate.
- How America's Foreclosure Crisis Worsened Under ObamaNothing is sadder than a man who disclaims his power to preserve his reputation. The presidency is subject to countless veto points and constraints, but the foreclosure disaster was unique; Congress had already given the incoming president the authority to act.
Obama the candidate ran on allowing bankruptcy judges to cut balances on primary mortgages; Obama’s administration actively whipped against the policy. Obama’s transition team earmarked up to $100 billion in funds appropriated through Bush’s bank bailout to mitigate foreclosures; eight years later only around $21 billion has been spent. Obama the president promised 4 million mortgage modifications; to date less than a million have been successfully achieved.
No Republican sign-off was necessary for Obama’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). The Treasury Department alone decided to run it through mortgage companies that had financial incentives to foreclose rather than modify loans. Treasury never saw the program as a relief vehicle, but a way to “foam the runway” for the banks, allowing them to absorb inevitable foreclosures more slowly. Homeowners were the foam being crushed by a jumbo jet in that scenario, squeezed for as many payments as possible before ultimately losing their homes.
Worst of all, most of these foreclosures were executed fraudulently. Banks neglected centuries-old property records laws, and used millions of forged and fabricated documents as evidence in courtrooms and county offices to paper over their mistakes. When this came to light in fall 2010, the leading mortgage companies stopped foreclosing because they could no longer do so legally.
But Obama’s Justice Department did not use this newfound leverage to obtain equitable solutions for struggling families. It didn’t prosecute those responsible for fraud. It reached a series of bank settlements that provided little meaningful relief. Fraudulent documents still get used in foreclosures today. And of course, no high-ranking executive saw the inside of a jail cell.