Again both these things you state only target a fraction of black people.
There are no people in prison for simple possession, nikkas are in jail for distribution and trafficking. Iys hard for me to feel sorry for you when you knew from jump the consequences of the game you were playing.
That's 100% false. I knew all sorts of fools in Cali who went to jail for mere possession.
Took me seconds to find this. 1 in 4 guys in New York incarcerated on nonviolent drug charges are in for mere possession:
Who Goes to Prison for Drug Offenses?
· One in four incarcerated drug offenders was convicted of simply possessing drugs.
The rest were convicted of possession with intent to sell, attempted sale or sales. Whether guilty of possession or sales-related offenses, most of the incarcerated offenders were low-level offenders involved with small amounts of drugs.4
On top of that there are 600,000 arrests for marijuana possession each year, and those arrests are VASTLY disproportionate towards Black folk. Sure, most of them won't do time, but that still fukks with your life in all sorts of ways. Decriminalizing marijuana would remove a tool police use to harass Black folk and would increase employment opportunities for Black folk. This is NOT because there's more pot in the Black community but because the Black community is targeted for their use far more often.
You can "blame" people for not being serious or whatever shyt, but the Republicans looking to fukk shyt up for the Black community don't give a shyt what the "blame" is. They only care about the numbers.And as far as the id thing goes, I still don't know any non drug addicted people that don't have an id. How many people did that actually stop from voting? How serious could they actually be about voting if they couldn't get to a dmv within the 2 to 4 years between local and federal elections?
Even if 95% of the community is fine, that 5% that gets screwed can decide an election. If I remember correctly only 2-3% of voters didn't have a valid ID, but among Black folk it was more like 5-6% and among White folk it was just 2% or less. Like I said, they explicitly looked for the types of ID that White folk had and the types that Black folk had and left the more Black ones off the list to make it that way.
Did you read the articles and see ALL the work they did to discriminate against White folk? Their personal files are public (thank God that one of their racist contractors bit the dust and his anti-racist granddaughter released all his personal files including communications with the party that proved their racism and lies). You're trying to tell me that the Republican Party would go to all those extremes to discriminate against Black folk, literally hire people to help them figure out how to screw Black people over most efficiently, leave all those receipts proving that they acted with racist intent, be convicted of racist intent in two different federal courts...and not think it was worth it?
Your armchair bullshyt assumption that "it won't make a difference" is worth more than the five years of work they put in and court cases they exposed themselves to on the assumption that it would actually make a big difference?