NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
So it wasn't by the luck of the draw that they were fortunate enough to have good GMs, no?unless your bird or magic (being drafted to play with cap, or getting mchale and parish your second season more than likely you're going to struggle)
Part of the process of winning is losing first.
Jordan
85 - lost 3-1 to the bucks
86 - swept by boston
87 - swept by boston
88 - lost to detroit 4-1
89 - lost to detroit 4-2
90 - lost to detroit 4-3
91 - broke through and won the title
shaq
93- miss playoffs
94 - swept by pacers
95 - swept by rockets
96 - swept by bulls
97 (joins lakers) - lost to utah 4-1
98 - swept by utah
99 - swept by spurs
00 - broke though won title
isiah thomas
82 - miss playoffs
83 - miss playoffs
84 - lose 3-2 to knicks
85 - lose 4-2 to boston
86 - lose 3-1 to atlanta
87 - lose 4-3 to boston
88 - lose 4-3 to the lakers
89 - break through win title
dr j
77- lose 4-2 to portland
78 - lose 4-2 to bullets
79 - lose 4-3 to spurs
80 - lose 4-2 to lakers
81 - lose 4-3 to boston
82 - lose 4-2 to lakers
83 - won title
Almost all superstars HOFs had to go through hell to win. This isn't anything new with Durant. The biggest difference is the guys i mentioned did not have another top 5 player with them nor did they jump to an already great team to win. People don't criticize durant for leaving, they get on him for going to the warriors. If he went to the wizards, spurs, bulls, etc.. no one would bat an eye. People question his competitive spirit by taking the so called "easy way" out to win a ring.
You're going to say no, right?
If so, you're being dishonest. If you agree, then why fault players for taking their careers out of the hands of their GMs and in their own hands?