Post an article, news story, documents, documentary etc. anything where it states that a women was criticized, critiqued, questioned, second guessed etc. by any major media outlet for accusing a man of rape.
And at the same time how was the male accusser viewed?
Kobe's accuser was trashed all over. Monica Lewinsky was trashed all over. Paula Jones was trashed all over (as was Kathleen Wiley and even the other witnesses). The girls that R. Kelly abused were trashed all over. Can you imagine watching Chappelle and being the subject of the "Pee on You" video, and that's even coming from someone who thought Kelly was guilty! The parents of the kids who accused Michael Jackson were trashed all over.
Now you'll probably go from "well, victims never get criticized" to "but they should have been criticized!" And then you're just going in circles again.
Of course, major media uses "nice words" when undermining the victims. It's the radio shows and columnists and message boards and barber shops and water cooler conversations where all the real venom comes out.
You can't point to a single one of those cases and say, "Oh, that rape victim was a nobody before, but she has a great public reputation right now. I'd wife her."
99% of men wouldn't touch any of those girls after those stories. But Kobe, Clinton, R. Kelly, they still have plenty of women lusting after them wherever they go. Because their rep never got destroyed.
You can't point to a single one of those cases and say, "The person who accused them has a better public image than the man they accused" right now.
Last edited: