R. Kelly was guilty, MJ was a pedo and OJ is guilty...so there goes your notion that I'm caping for all black celebs.
R. Kelly never went to jail.
Michael Jackson never went to jail.
OJ never went to jail.
So there goes the argument that Black men automatically catch sentences when they get accused of shyt. Powerful, wealthy men don't play by the same rules the rest of us have to play by. And that's even though Michael Jackson is the only one of those three that was even close to as popular as Cosby, and he didn't have the beloved squeaky-clean image that Cosby had.
You keep saying "what accusations were before the 60s?" He had to have started somewhere with the deviant behavior. Where is the classmate in H.S. or the female relative saying how he was a deviant as a young man/child?
He just doesn't sudden get this deviant behavior in his 30s as he gets older.
Damn, ya'all just coming and coming with the ridiculous excuses.
You arguing that he definitely would have caught a charge if he'd been doing this in the 1960s, and then you use the fact that there aren't any cases before 1969 as some sort of evidence that he never did it? You don't think he could have held off on behavior that would get him thrown in the slammer and waited until he knew he could get away with it?
Every single one of his rapes is an abuse of power situation. How was Cosby going to pull off that shyt when he was a teenager with no power? It's not coincidence that the first case we're hearing about is 1969...right after Cosby had started his own production company, own label, was running his own shyt on his own property, came out with a show in his own name for the first time, and was popular as hell coming off four straight Emmys. You really don't think that men with power sometimes let that power get to their head and start doing shyt and taking advantage of that power in a way that they couldn't do when they didn't have power?
Cosby has a on/off switch for the rape urge? Prime Ms. Rashad and Lisa Bonet on the set, but nothing happened?
You have no fukking clue how rapists work, do you? Now the excuse is, "if he didn't rape every woman that walked around him, must not have raped any"??? The women he took advantage of were no-namers
who had no power and who he could easily take advantage of, not major co-stars.
There's something not right about this. This is a systematic destruction. If all this is true, doesnt this make Bill Cosby a record breaking rapist?
I'm struggling to believe that not a single one of those women agreed to have sex with Bill.
Who the hell ever asked you to believe that? If one or two of these women are lying and just jumped on the bandwagon with the accusations, would that change the substance of the story at all? Why are you still focusing on the women, just searching for a way to shyt on the women, instead of focusing on the actual rapist in the story?
why wont you respond to these women taking payments and gifts,and multiple stories of them going back for more "rape"?how many ridiculous claims does it take for you to question the credibility of alot of these women?or is no story to ridiculous for you to believe
How does refusing to bring charges mean the DA ignored it just because they didnt bring charges? I dont know the details of each of these cases to say it didnt deserve to get thrown out.
But based on the papertrail and the fact many of these women were taking payments and gifts from Cosby....Along with continuing to visit with Cosby,i would say MAYBE the D.A saw it looked like bullshyt too...But not The Dankster you believe it must be true because a bunch of women said so....All you proved is what can happen when pay a bytch off and the other women youve been fukking for free feel shortchanged
Read the stories. The vast majority of the women didn't "continue to visit" Cosby or "go back for more rape". There were like two women in the whole group that were raped more than once. And they weren't just voluntarily hanging with him in a no-pressure situation - they fukking worked there. And do you actually believe that no victim ever goes back to her abuser, even though that shyt's been proven over and over again?
And now you're saying that if they take money, then they were getting paid off and must not have been raped. And if they didn't take money, then they're just bitter and feel shortchanged. So you're still admitting that no matter what the scenario, whether the woman took money or not, you automatically believe Cosby over the women, just because.
You don't think a powerful man can give women money to keep their mouth shut, and then say to them, "You tell anyone, and I'll show them these gifts and they'll just think you're a slut and a golddigger." You haven't heard about shyt like that happening from victimized women all the time? Abused women get "gifts" from their abusers all the time, and take it because what the fukk else are they going to do? That's a major tactic, because they like to fukk up the girl's psychology that way - it makes them more likely to blame themselves and less likely to go to the cops, and gives them a nice little alibi for ignorant people like you, "Look, she took my gift, I must not have raped her". That shyt happens all the time with proven abusers, and you're actually going to use it as evidence that they're lying?
Which one of the stories isn't credible. Tell me the exact story that you don't believe. And if 1 or 2 of the stories isn't credible in your eyes, how the fukk would that invalidate the other 40+ allegations?
In your mind, if only one woman came out, then she's probably lying....but if more and more women come out...then it's even more likely they're lying! It's a no-win situation.
"Scotti told the
NY Daily News that he did almost anything to protect Bill Cosby at he network’s behest — including paying off women. Scotti alleges that when Bill invited young models into his dressing room that he would even stand outside and guard the door."
"A rapist who forced a teenager to have sex and then
paid her as a reward has been jailed for a decade."
"The accused person was my neighbour... It was only after the incident... he told me,
he gave me the money to keep silent"
"Many
abusers are dog whistling when they give their victim gifts. The gift looks innocent on the surface, the hidden message is inaudible to most witnesses, but it has a big effect on the victim."
Nagaland rape victim
offered money to keep silent.
Congressman kept
giving his victim money to keep him quiet.
"After a violent incident, there is often a "honeymoon period" during which the abuser may apologize profusely, give the victim gifts and persuade the victim to stay,
experts say. But when that period is over, the abuser may once again become violent."
"Phase 3:
Honeymoon Phase (this is where the batterer/abuser apologizes for his behavior buying the victim gifts or flowers) "
"Offenders
also use gifts and trickery to manipulate and silence the child into keeping the sexual assault a secret."
"After committing the crime Masati
offered his victim $1, saying it was her Christmas present."
....why not file a rape claim like the first women did WHO GOT PAID OFF....and you really asking me whats the incentive to file a false rape claim?same as the parents who were proven to be liars who made they kids lie on Michael Jackson.
So if they go looking for that money, they're golddiggers and liars. And if they don't go looking for that money, they must not really mean it and are liars.
There were 15 women who had these claims out against Cosby by 2005. Only one filed a civil case and got paid off. The other 14 didn't follow suit, and most of them stayed anonymous...
maybe because they aren't golddiggers and weren't looking for that money???
I've already given you half a dozen reasons why women don't accuse powerful men of rape, most of all because it destroys their careers and public (and private) image and because they usually don't get believed anyway. You keep ignoring that women take a shytload of L's when they go public about this - even though this whole thread is full of the exact shyt I'm talking about.
Why women don't report rape
Here's a good example
Didnt Chris Rock recently have a rape allegation?he paid the chick off too....hope 40 white women dont randomly come out the woodwork to say he raped em...Dankster believes that means he mustve done it
Yes, when 40 different witnesses come out accusing you of the same crime, it's makes it pretty fukking likely that you did that crime. That's the difference between one person coming out and forty people coming out. You have another example where 40 different unassociated people came out publicly accusing someone of the same crime, and they were all making it up?
All these other cases where powerful Black men caught cases, caught charges, either went to the slammer or beat the charges or paid the girl off...and not once did 40 other women come out and make up false charges to add onto that first women. But ya'all treating it like some sort of automatic trait of female nature that they're all just going to lie en masse like this against the poor man....even though no other Black man has ever caught 40+ false allegations in the history of entertainment.
And let's point out that this isn't just any Black man, but the most beloved and popular Black man in the White community in the history of entertainment, one who had the cleanest image and the longest history of making White people happy, and one who had
spent the last 15 years shytting on modern urban Black people and giving right-wingers fantastic quotes left and right. If a great White conspiracy was going to get set up against some Black man, this is the last man they'd do that to.
Far as evidence I would need,how about a actual rape kit?how about one woman out of 40 who fought back and went to the police who saw signs of a struggle?oh there was no struggle?all they azzes took the pill and fell out,but woke up to see themselves being raped?yet didnt regain conscience and scream rape or cause a scene?out of 40 women?never had to kill one?he was powerful enuff to do it and get away with it right
?
Rape kit? What would a rape kit show that Cosby hasn't already admitted to?
And your other scenarios are random as fukk because they're based on shyt that Cosby never did. He wasn't beating these women up to fukk them like some crazy White dude in the park. You won't believe the women unless they have proof of shyt that they didn't even say happened?
Or are you saying that unless the half-drugged woman screams rape or causes a scene in the middle of Cosby's own production studio, where
Cosby's own guy is admittedly guarding the door to let him do this shyt, that it's not rape?
Once a ho always a ho.. Every single one these supposed "victims" were groupies, escorts, and playboy "models" who slept with Cosby voluntarily to further their career. Their acting and modeling careers never panned out and now these old ass bitter broads finally hit a lick before going to the grave. None of these interviews and magazine stories are being done for free. They getting paid thousands of dollars for every cnn or tv interview. And finally in 2015 they are getting the attention they have been craving their whole lives. One thing about ho's and groupies is that they love attention.. doesn't matter if its good or bad. That's their mentality. That's why they do all that foul stuff to get with these degenerate celebrities in the first place.
That's a lot of accusations. Where are your receipts for any of that?
Did you witness any of the claims you just made? Here any actual evidence for any of them? Or just make that shyt up?
And ya'all wonder why women don't come out, when this is the response they get.
Wait. So what if they know about murders? what about the dudes who supply cosby with this horrible horrible drug he used to destroy these womens lives? They shouldnt want that person in jail?
Im not being creative. I believe a prostitute can be raped but at the same time she got to incriminate herself. All these females got something to gain now.
t took them this long to come out cause of their "feelings" why not also wage a war against the dealers who supply said drug. Im just looking at it from the many angles that these slick females and media ignore to attack someone who they didnt want to attack years ago.
Wait, what da fukk are you talking about murders now for? These women know about murders? Where'd you get that in your head?
And it was the fukking pharmacist who was supplying Cosby with the drugs. What would the women know anyway about Cosby's supplier - HE was getting the drugs, not them.
(If they really just liked doing drugs and having sex, by the way, then why isn't there a single case of the woman being the one who bought and brought the drugs in?)
Whats the number for these women to feel comfortable calling cosby a rapist. 15, 17 it obviously had to be more than 10. It takes 25 women to come forward for one to get the courage to accuse cosby of rape?
What women rape victim/accuser have ever been criticized in the media?