Sure but in white collar corporate???? Not happening.
Different levels different devils. Maybe being fired is better than the shanagans that Federal supervisors do to you.Government employment >>>> Private sector
People seem to forget where all this workplace etiquette originated from. There was a time when you could start at a company and work from the mail room to CEO if you were good enough. Companies promised yearly raises and a pension. New hires never made what employees with seniority made. So companies valued employee retention, and thus exiting properly made sense. No more pensions, seniority means squat, and quitting is the best way to get a raise today. Its not uncommon for a future employer to want someone to start immediately. Its odd that you hold long term grudges against employees that dip and no-show, but don't keep that same energy with the employer. Whether the dude no-showed or was fired, you and your teams workload was going to increase just the same. Why would one scenario upset you more than the other? Your employer can increase your job title's responsibilities without compensation even with the same number of people on your team. Break them chains, breh.I don’t think I agree with that, especially if you are moving on simply for a better opportunity and not because of wrong doing by your current job. In my field there are a TON of former coworkers I came up with who are in senior leadership positions including myself. We remember folks who just left us high and dry with no warning. I would never hire any of those people and if I saw their name come up for any positions in my field of influence I would recommend they not be hired.
That exact scenario played out with me late last year. I was walking into a building and saw a guy who used to work for one of my operations. At the old spot breh ended up leaving us, no notice, just no call no showed one day and quit. He saw me in the lobby and chatted like everything was all good. Soon as I went in I went to HR and said “do not hire”.
I think these kinds of videos will radicalized white collar workers. The American revolution wasn't started by working class people. By today's standards, the founding fathers would be tech and energy millionaires. The magna Carta wasn't written by farmers. Average people couldn't read let alone write.
They aren't obligated to give her an explanation for why she's being let go. That's how "at will employment" works. It would be nice and transparent if they did, but they aren't under an obligation to do so. That's the entire point of a lot of our comments.
Well AI is coming and the Great Quit happened so we shall see.
I didn't say they were obligated to, I said they should. I don't know why you keep writing the definition of at will employment over and over.
It wouldn't have changed anything and depending on how spicey they said it they may have gotten a lawsuit.
I always give two weeks notice if it's on good terms but keeping it real, if i was in your position, unless I'm a shareholder of the company, i wouldn't go out of my way to make sure the guy doesn't get hired...I don’t think I agree with that, especially if you are moving on simply for a better opportunity and not because of wrong doing by your current job. In my field there are a TON of former coworkers I came up with who are in senior leadership positions including myself. We remember folks who just left us high and dry with no warning. I would never hire any of those people and if I saw their name come up for any positions in my field of influence I would recommend they not be hired.
That exact scenario played out with me late last year. I was walking into a building and saw a guy who used to work for one of my operations. At the old spot breh ended up leaving us, no notice, just no call no showed one day and quit. He saw me in the lobby and chatted like everything was all good. Soon as I went in I went to HR and said “do not hire”.
There’s no kind and humane way to tell someone that they’re losing their job and being let go.
In most states, that's illegal. It would constitute Tortious Interference With a Business Contract. The worst the company can say is, "We would not hire that person in the future".
