This is a wild misinterpretation of events. Russia supporters like to ignore that their 2014 invasion and annexation of Crimea (and the rigged referendum) were key factors leading to the ongoing conflict and barriers to any lasting peace. The invasion in 2022 was a further escalation, which called for armed support to fight off an aggressive, unprovoked force. Again, this is a sovereign nation that's free to build alliances with whomever they choose. Trying to hinder them for your benefit is just as bad as the West exploiting them for theirs. However, it is ultimately their choice. And they are choosing to fight off an invader.
Regarding peace talks during the invasion, Putin claimed a comprehensive peace agreement spanning 18 articles, including security guarantees. These claims should not be taken in good faith, given what happened in 2014. In those peace talks, Russia wanted official recognition of the territories they annexed and neutrality enshrined in Ukraine's constitution, while Ukraine demanded that Russia fully withdraw from Crimea, remove their troops from occupying Donbas, and pay reparations. Ultimately, the talks went nowhere, but a line remained open for further negotiations in the future. The claim that peace was going to happen before Boris Johnson stepped in is a skewed interpretation of the situation. It ignores the dynamics of the peace talks and the primary obstacle holding them up, which was Russia's unrealistic demands for holding onto annexed territories.
America's sale of weapons to the Azov Nazis isn't something I support. It's a gross contradiction of their so-called principles. It undermines any claims of upholding democratic values and human rights principles. Any kind of support for Ukraine should have been conditioned on Ukraine dissolving their National Guard battalion and eliminating those elements. Providing them with weapons will just lead to bigger problems in the future.