Question
why didn't they show Pitt killing his wife
It was purposely left ambiguous to create the mystery and myth of that character. Nobody really knows nor nobody can prove that he actually did.
Question
why didn't they show Pitt killing his wife
Just saw this.
shyt was terrible. What the fukk. No plot. Just scenes trying to be clever.
There definitely a plot, just not much story due to it being a character analysis of Rick Dalton, Cliff Booth and Sharon Tate. It's mostly a story about Dalton's struggle in his decline as a famous actor as he is symbolic of a simpler time in Hollywood. His character arc is that of denial, acceptance and redemption. Cliff is that loyal homie that's always down for Rick. He represent everything that Rick wishes to be. The irony of him being a double has a double meaning as to it also equate to his actual life as someone like Cliff does most of the heroics and Rick ends up with the glory (as both in the films and what happens in the end). And Sharon Tate represented the innocence of the late 60's. So, she's carefree and aspiring which is in contrast to Rick being depressive and pessimistic. The back drop is the threat of the Manson family as we know in real life represented innocence lost, but for this film, it's the thread that eventually connects the polarizing worlds of old men and vibrant youth with a fairy tale-like conclusion.
Dog food, feet and flamethrowers.What’s this shyt even about?
Dog food, feet and flamethrowers.
Well said.There definitely a plot, just not much story due to it being a character analysis of Rick Dalton, Cliff Booth and Sharon Tate. It's mostly a story about Dalton's struggle in his decline as a famous actor as he is symbolic of a simpler time in Hollywood. His character arc is that of denial, acceptance and redemption. Cliff is that loyal homie that's always down for Rick. He represent everything that Rick wishes to be. The irony of him being a double has a double meaning as to it also equate to his actual life as someone like Cliff does most of the heroics and Rick ends up with the glory (as both in the films and what happens in the end). And Sharon Tate represented the innocence of the late 60's. So, she's carefree and aspiring which is in contrast to Rick being depressive and pessimistic. The back drop is the threat of the Manson family as we know in real life represented innocence lost, but for this film, it's the thread that eventually connects the polarizing worlds of old men and vibrant youth with a fairy tale-like conclusion.
I don't know, I didn't really like Pulp fiction either. Only Sam's parts.
Always preferred Dogs, Basterds, and the Kill Bills over Pulp.
Wait are you saying you didn’t like the movie pulp fiction