Bigblackted4
Superstar
Couldn’t make it through on firestick I might try and catch a cheap matinee this week
In the trailers it was funny, but seeing it within the film’s contest was fukking sad.Compare this to mediocre ass lion King. QT directed his ass off. Leo was hilarious, when that little kid told him it was the best acting she'd ever seen and he starts crying
I sort of liked it
This movie is way more accessible than his other films. Not as dialogue heavy as his other joints and it moved throughout.
The biggest flaw with this movie is that the Sharon Tate angle was literally unnecessary.
He indulged the fukk out of his feet fetish.
Notice I said it about the Tate angle.It kinda was necessary in that it helped sell the movie in a way.
Also, it was the underlying tension in the movie. The movie was verrrrrrrrrrrry long. But you knew something was going to happen at the end based on what happened with Tate and Manson's crew. Tension reved up too when they went to the movie ranch. Felt like something was going pop off there. Movie ranch scene was kinda like the opening scene in Inglorious Basterds where Tarantino was playing around with the tension. Tarantino used the Tate aspect and her perceived doom in providing the tension and drama in the movie.
It also helped the twist at the end. Added more to the shock value of the twist. He did the same thing in Inglorious Basterds with Hitler's outcome.
Without that tension based on historial events, the movie would even be less than it was.
Nah, this shyt is trash. Waste your money and time if you want to.Welp the coli is shytting on a Tarantino movie...sooo that means its probably a classic
Notice I said it about the Tate angle.
And I didn’t say it about Manson. That’s where the tension came from for me. And that was one scene.
You said weakness. I haven't seen the movie. Just was curious about what you meant.I'm mainly talking about this flick bruh. Ain't trying to debate his catalogue. But his last movie also had an issue with a dragging plot.
I liked both films btw.
I feel you.
Tate was the one who was murdered in real life, while pregnant. Manson's crew went up to the house and murdered her and her friends in that house. It was a historic event.
Tarantino exploited that aspect and put her character in the movie. Had Dalton live next door to her. Given all of that, something was bound to happen. That adds to the allure to the movie besides Leo and Brad Pitt and Margot being in it and Tarantino directing it.
And knowing what Tarantino did in lnglorious Basterds in altering history, another draw is what he would do with the Manson crew Tate murder.
You are right, Tate was unnecessary. So was the Manson aspect. Instead, Tarantino went back to his old bag of tricks. He relied on exploiting the Tate and Manson historical event to help aid his movie. Had he not, the movie would have been a thinner story than in its current form.
I sort of liked it
This movie is way more accessible than his other films. Not as dialogue heavy as his other joints and it moved throughout.
The biggest flaw with this movie is that the Sharon Tate angle was literally unnecessary.
He indulged the fukk out of his feet fetish.
This is definitely an 'insider's movie' in that you need a relatively high level of insight into the Charlie Manson story to really appreciate the characters and the story.
Imagine if the premise of this movie was applied to say OJ's story? I think it'd resonate a lot more on the Coli