Why are you acting like 33 is somehow old, especially someone like Jokic whose game isn't relying upon any athleticism, whatsoever?
France has Nolan Traore, who's currently projected to go #2 in next year's draft. He'll have a couple years of NBA experience before 2028. They also have young guards coming through like Sidy Cissoko and Ryan Rupert. To go along with lottery picks: Risacher, Sarr, Salaun, Coulibaly. These cats don't need to evolve into superstars. Truth be told, the makeup of role players which France will have in the rotation won't be known until they prepare for next World Cup.
Wemby is enough on his own that in four years time he'll be running the league.
If those lottery picks develop into secondary stars and role players, and they build chemistry over a cycle (which Team USA won't), they're going to be a problem.
Now, this is just ridiculously untrue.
No different?
We just saw Ant play himself off the floor when the lights shone the brightest. He completely lost his bearings when his jumper wasn't falling and he didn't know what to do -- even when he wasn't the main focus of the defense. To the contrary, we saw Shai drag his sorry ass team all throughout the QF against France, making bucket after bucket, not shying away from the moment, never losing his focus.
Forgive me for tapering my expectations on Ant when this was supposed to be his coming-out party and he shyt the bed. To make matters worse, he couldn't have asked for a more easier transition than to come off the bench against second units, focus almost entirely on scoring, not needing to manage the game or asked to be the center of attention of defenses.
FIBA World Cup last year, Shai showed why there's levels to this shyt when he wiped the floor with Ant and Team USA (when they didn't have proven star on the international stage to anchor the team).
Now, that's not to say that Ant couldn't become that player, but he's got to prove it first. Shai has already done that. You're arguing in bad faith if you're acting like they're the same player after watching what Ant did in the knockout games of the Olympics.
Did you just refer to Wemby as a 20-year-old?
If he stays relatively injury-free, there'll be nobody we can put on the floor in the next Olympics that will be able to match him. There hasn't been a time in the last 20-30+ years where another country has had a player who's on another level to what we can produce. That will most likely be the case in LA2028.
How is this even remotely relevant to what's going to happen in 2028?
You're drowning yourself with these non sequiturs.
Besides the fact that Wemby is a better player right now, Chet is most likely going to come into calculations for the next Olympics (if not sooner during the FIBA World Cup), especially if OKC string together a dominant 2-3 window. To take it even a step further, this is going to be valuable experience for someone Wemby, whereas the "ridiculous depth" of our squad is likely going to throw out there some bigs who haven't had even remotely the same exposure on the international stage.
Except it does matter, because you need generational talent and experience to give yourself the best possible chance of winning at the Olympics.
Team USA have always had that in their favor.
You then proceed to list a bunch of nxggas who either 1. Don't have that experience 2. Aren't generational players.
Why are you listing Zion as if he'll even be healthy enough for an Olympics campaign, or even effective enough in four years time (and not weighed down by injuries). Is Tatum even going to be there in four years time given he's pretty much had the heaviest schduele over the last 2-3 years (which is clearly reflected in his recent struggles), and which that workload will likely continue over the next 2-3 years given how dominant the Celtics project to be?
Ja and Maxey are both buckets, but again, they're not generational stars.
There's a lot of overlapping skillsets there with combo score-first guards, not many wings, no main option big man (unless Chet develops into one). Where's the game manager? Where's the dominant big? Where's the wing who can score in every situation?
What you listed is a surface-level talent team, where individually, they're more talented on paper than what every other team can put out on the floor, but there's no KD-level player there, and there's no harmony with that group. You're treating this like 2k, throwing out these players who're rated the best, despite the fact they're going to be stepping on one another to jack up shots and not creating for one another.
Or do you seem to think a team with that much inexperience are going to figure it all out within a handful of exhibition games right before the Olympics?
You have Jovic (who should continue to flourish in the Heat system), Topic (who's projected as being one of the top Euro guards), Poku, Djurisic, Vukcevic etc all coming through. Bogdan will likely still be there, but he'll have a more reduced role.
Talent is coming through all the damn time,
everywhere. Why do you seem to think that other countries are going backwards or stagnating? Why do you seem to think that the amount of international players in the NBA isn't increasing every year?
Why do you keep speaking about France in the past tense, when we're talking about what they'll potentially be in 2028?
I know one thing for sure, you have absolutely no idea of what you're talking about. You're not even formulating a proper argument; choosing to throw all your weight behind minutiae, not even bother trying to discuss the point that actually being debated.
You're hanging your entire argument on a model of a team which won't even be relevant in four years time. Glossing over the fact that France has lottery talent coming through in abundance, running parralel to the timeline of a player who'll soon be the face of the league.
This is why your analysis can't be trusted.
You're picturing the worst cast scenarios for every single other nation, yet you've got a 27-year-old Bam suddenly becoming a next level scorer from where he's currently at. You're not in the least bit trying to be objective.
Except Bron, Steph and KD won't be there at the next Olympics, well, certainly not in the same capacity. I don't know why you're listing the accomplishments of the team, when I'm asking you about what the players that'll be there in 2028.
Try again.
What did all that "insane talent" do in this Olympics, whilst they were background characters to Bron, Steph and KD?