Official Tupac Biopic "All Eyez On Me" Thread

[Afromaticz]

Number 1 easy the other 2 are wack af

 

[DarkandHellisHot]

Number 1 easy

 

[Nomad1]

number 3

 

[The Ruler 09]

I like number 3.

 

[Techniec]

One easy

 

[Lord Beasley]

1 or 3. Leaning towards 1 because of the eye

 

[FakeNews]

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

They should go with #1


There's something "off" about 2 & 3...Especially #2


I know they tried to recapture this

But he's hunched over too damn much

I don't know how you don't go with #1.... 2 & 3 are tacky as fukk.


But I see a lot of fans voting #3....Looking like that might be the movie poster


I don't know what they're trying to capture in that pic.Highlighted gold...hand over the face.

I've never seen a Pac pic like that


Edit...I guess this is what they're going for

That's for Mozart, not a fukking movie poster.

#1 actually looks professional....They shouldn't let the fans vote on this

 

[FakeNews]

I don't know how you don't go with #1.... 2 & 3 are tacky as fukk.


But I see a lot of fans voting #3....Looking like that might be the movie poster


I don't know what they're trying to capture in that pic.Highlighted gold...hand over the face.

I've never seen a Pac pic like that


Edit...I guess this is what they're going for

That's for Mozart, not a fukking movie poster.

#1 actually looks professional....They shouldn't let the fans vote on this

Benny posted #1 on his instagram, but it looks like he deleted it

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

1 doesn't show any characteristics of pac, he usually had his body or jewelry or bandana or tats showing in best pics. i like 2 for the picture but i would use the other subtitle for it: "the true story" instead of "the story behind the legend". also they should brighten it up so you can see the tats

 

[FakeNews]

How exactly are they going to determine this vote? by intstagram comments? Man these dudes are so corny.

I prefer 1, but I can live with 3(But I agree I'm not sure what they are trying to capture with it). 2 just looks low budget as fukk like some straight to dvd type ish

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

1 doesn't show any characteristics of pac, he usually had his body or jewelry or bandana or tats showing in best pics. i like 2 for the picture but i would use the other subtitle for it: "the true story" instead of "the story behind the legend". also they should brighten it up so you can see the tats

This is a movie, tho.

Not a photo shoot for Vibe or a CD cover.

1 only stands out because the other 2 are shytty.

I don't like how they highlighted the jewelry in #3.The pose is off, to

#1 looks like a legit movie poster....The eye/gaze is highlighted +It captures Pac being a thinking/introspective man

I like the ambiguity in that.And it has the trademark nose ring.It's more identifiable.

2 is just terrible....Don't even know why they showed that shyt to the public.Angle fukked, too dark, and breh look like a hunch back.

Focuses more on the "Thug" side.....#3 is vain with the highlighted jewelry.


They'd need to go with #1....It's open ended.Allows you to make your own mind up.

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

movie covers should be just as interesting as a cd cover or magazine if not more. i would put 2 or 3 on my wall (if i was a younger, im grown now so i dont do posters too much lol), definitely not 1 and i made points on how it could be better. they can easily adjust the light it would be 10 times better. @MooseMouthMthafuga

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

Just saw a TV spot on BET

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

movie covers should be just as interesting as a cd cover or magazine if not more. i would put 2 or 3 on my wall (if i was a younger, im grown now so i dont do posters too much lol), definitely not 1 and i made points on how it could be better. they can easily adjust the light it would be 10 times better. @MooseMouthMthafuga

Hey we all have are own perspectives.I ain't mad at ya