They can claim in court filings there's no conflict but the moment her name shows up on tickets and trips he's booking it shows that s lie.Conflict of interest at the minimum. Let's not be naive this is an issue.
They can claim in court filings there's no conflict but the moment her name shows up on tickets and trips he's booking it shows that s lie.Conflict of interest at the minimum. Let's not be naive this is an issue.
Which trial is delayed indefinitely?So we got one trial delayed indefinitely.
One trial in the hands of a Maga lunatic judge.
And one trial with a DA smashing her lead prosecutor?
Just as he planned it.
Which trial is delayed indefinitely?
They waiting for the appeals court to make a ruling on immunityFederal judge in Trump’s DC election interference case postpones trial | CNN Politics
The trial date in Washington, DC, in the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump has been postponed, according to a new court order in the case.amp.cnn.com
They can claim in court filings there's no conflict but the moment her name shows up on tickets and trips he's booking it shows that s lie.
Someone tell me what’s going on. I haven’t followed any of this shyt. @T’Challa’s Heir asking how this is relevant seemed on the right track though.@No1 get in here and make it all make sense
Because they're lying. Lawyers have different ethics than a normal job. The Fulton county code of ethics is pretty fukking clear:How? How does them fukking create a conflict? Them fukking didn’t affect the evidence.
It's going to be delayed til after the election. Trump is going to appeal to SCOTUS. The only trial we're probably getting before the election is Bragg's.They waiting for the appeals court to make a ruling on immunity
I want to know who had the drop on Fanni...has to be someone in her circle for sure
or Roman hired a PI
Did they specifically say it’s going to be delayed until after the election or is that some shyt you assuming?It's going to be delayed til after the election. Trump is going to appeal to SCOTUS. The only trial we're probably getting before the election is Bragg's.
Because they're lying. Lawyers have different ethics than a normal job. The Fulton county code of ethics is pretty fukking clear:
Officers and employees should aspire to avoid even the appearance of a conflict
of interest by avoiding conduct or circumstances that would provide a reasonable
basis for the impression that the officer’s or employee’s ability to protect the
public interest or impartially perform an official act is compromised by his or her
financial or personal interests in the matter or transaction. The appearance of a
conflict of interest can exist even in the absence of an actual conflict of interest.
(c) Officers and employees should aspire to avoid even the appearance of
impropriety by avoiding conduct or circumstances that would provide a
reasonable basis for the impression that a person can improperly influence or
unduly enjoy the officer’s or employee’s favor in the performance of his or her
official acts or actions. The appearance of impropriety can exist even in the
absence of actual impropriety.
How? How does them fukking create a conflict? Them fukking didn’t affect the evidence.