Sorry but the charges for the Stormy Daniels case is lame and I see most of the public not accepting these charges as legit. This case should have went away years ago.
How so?

Sorry but the charges for the Stormy Daniels case is lame and I see most of the public not accepting these charges as legit. This case should have went away years ago.
I don't think the public will consider it a serious crime. All they see is paying off a porn star.How so?The henchman got a three year sentence for carrying out the deed on Trump’s direction.
So now we’re back to not enforcing the laws because the person is powerfulI don't think the public will consider it a serious crime. All they see is paying off a porn star.
Politics is politics and the bar is high for indicting a former President.So now we’re back to not enforcing the laws because the person is powerful![]()
Charge him. If the people of New York decide he’s not guilty then oh well.Politics is politics and the bar is high for indicting a former President.
It's worked so far for MerrickSo now we’re back to not enforcing the laws because the person is powerful![]()
Sorry but the charges for the Stormy Daniels case is lame and I see most of the public not accepting these charges as legit. This case should have went away years ago.
I'm assuming you're laughing at me.
This is stupid.I'm assuming you're laughing at me.
I'm not in the MSNBC/liberal twitter bubble that wants to indict him for eating too much KFC.
I want this to be done the right way. For serious charges that the public can understand. Such as the fake elector scheme from January 6th.
Paying off a pornstar using hush money is pretty simple for people to grasp.I'm assuming you're laughing at me.
I'm not in the MSNBC/liberal twitter bubble that wants to indict him for eating too much KFC.
I want this to be done the right way. For serious charges that the public can understand. Such as the fake elector scheme from January 6th.
I'm sorry, but indicting Trump because he paid off a porn star in a shady way will not resonate with most of the country. It will not be seen as a serious crime and this will only help him.This is stupid.
Trump committed a crime. It’s plain and simple. I don’t know why or how you got pundit brained, but you are. I don’t care if the public don’t accept it as legit, it’s a crime.
If you want to have a gripe about the Jan.6 stuff, go call Merrick Garland. But you won’t because you seem to be waiting for orders from whatever pundit is giving you instructions.
When you get involved with politics, what are you even looking for? You don’t seem to care for a better society. You just want some weird west wing tv show political brinkmanship. It’s goofy. Grow up.
The Manhattan DA can’t charge Trump with anything Jan. 6 related since… it didn’t happen in Manhattan.I'm sorry, but indicting Trump because he paid off a porn star in a shady way will not resonate with most of the country. It will not be seen as a serious crime and this will only help him.
January 6th however, is a clear indictment that most of public will accept, even though it's impact will not be as strong if the indictment was 1 year ago since Trump is currently a Presidential candidate.
If anything, I wouldn't mind if the indictment for this came after most serious indictments came first.
Question:I'm sorry, but indicting Trump because he paid off a porn star in a shady way will not resonate with most of the country. It will not be seen as a serious crime and this will only help him.
January 6th however, is a clear indictment that most of public will accept, even though it's impact will not be as strong if the indictment was 1 year ago since Trump is currently a Presidential candidate.
If anything, I wouldn't mind if the indictment for this came after most serious indictments came first.
Where did I say the DA would indict Trump for January 6? That clearly comes from DOJ. You didn't read my post and just jumped to look for a reason to insult.The Manhattan DA can’t charge Trump with anything Jan. 6 related since… it didn’t happen in Manhattan.
You’re a goofy and completely unserious.
Trump is a former President who is running to be President again. The bar to indict a former President is extremely high because of the potential blowback from a weak indictment.Question:
Do you believe not enforcing laws leads to perception that said laws aren’t a big deal or said actions shouldn’t be considered illegal in the first place?