Mad i seen a comment with somebody reducing the movie to, all this just to get his friends into MIT
![]()
I like that the movie was at least self aware enough to acknowledge how dumb it all was, when Strange was like
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fa6/27fa6ec7e1f480a3bdc0098a21f61814d48a84a0" alt="mindblown :mindblown: :mindblown:"
Fred.
Mad i seen a comment with somebody reducing the movie to, all this just to get his friends into MIT
![]()
Ah shytMad i seen a comment with somebody reducing the movie to, all this just to get his friends into MIT
![]()
It’s funny you say that because I read an article on AV club the other day pontificating on why critics aren’t doing weekly recaps of Yellowstone. The idea being that it’s one of the most watched shows on television, and easily laps other internet beloved shows in terms of viewership, has a stacked cast, and doesn’t get the attention or awards that lesser watched shows get.I think they actually cut Barker in on the HBO series, which is cool.
But yeah. Once you sell the rights it's a wrap. There's very few good outcomes to it, for the creators.
Yeah I dunno man.
I never seen "Avatar", never gave a fukk about it. Movie still made $2.8 billion.
A lot of people, especially on the internet, have a hard time separating their reality, from objective reality.
Fred.
I always see advertisements for thisIt’s funny you say that because I read an article on AV club the other day pontificating on why critics aren’t doing weekly recaps of Yellowstone. The idea being that it’s one of the most watched shows on television, and easily laps other internet beloved shows in terms of viewership, has a stacked cast, and doesn’t get the attention or awards that lesser watched shows get.
The writer hinted at,but mostly ignored the fact writers on the internet are in one big echo chamber and always want to impress their peers. So if critic A is talking about succession all the time then critic B better also talk about succession or else. The perception on the internet is that shows like Billions or Succession are monster hits but the reality is they’re nowhere close to the numbers of a show like Yellowstone. And not talking quality here, just numbers.
And the main reason there’s no Friday the 13th movie since 09.
Same. But going to the places that do weekly recaps of shows, you’d think it doesn’t existI always see advertisements for this![]()
Is that why Corman had to make this piece of shyt?It’s also why we’re getting TWO Hellraiser related things next year. Hbo show and a Hulu movie. And the main reason there’s no Friday the 13th movie since 09.
This is business and it’s a lot more normal than some people realize.
Honestly may check it out one daySame. But going to the places that do weekly recaps of shows, you’d think it doesn’t exist
Yellowstone is one of TV's biggest shows, but far from the buzziest
It's gonna be tough to follow up with another Spider-Man movie from here. I feel like a lot of casual cats are not gonna dig a Spider-man that's back to smaller stakes.
Is that why Corman had to make this piece of shyt?
The prequel show just started. And I know there’s a thread on the main show on the board.Honestly may check it out one day![]()
Sony spent more money on those movies and they made less the Tobey ones. They were expecting TASM2 to do over a Billion Dollars and it became the lowest grossing Spider-Man movie. The movie struggled to reach $200 Million in the Domestic Box Office which is something the Raimi films did in a matter of a few days (NWH outgrossed both of Andrews films Domestically in it's Opening Weekend). When an X-Men movie (DOFP) does better than a Spider-Man movie (TASM2), something is wrong.His movies made close to $800 mill each.
I wasn't personally a fan but why do you cats act like his movie were direct to DVD status?
They were massive hits, of course they have a ton of fans.
Fred.
Really? I’m honestly looking more forward to Spider-Man taking on street-level villains than ever before.It's gonna be tough to follow up with another Spider-Man movie from here. I feel like a lot of casual cats are not gonna dig a Spider-man that's back to smaller stakes.
His movies made close to $800 mill each.
I wasn't personally a fan but why do you cats act like his movie were direct to DVD status?
They were massive hits, of course they have a ton of fans.
Fred.
Sony spent more money on those movies and they made less the Tobey ones. They were expecting TASM2 to do over a Billion Dollars and it became the lowest grossing Spider-Man movie. The movie struggled to reach $200 Million in the Domestic Box Office which is something the Raimi films did in a matter of a few days (NWH outgrossed both of Andrews films Domestically in it's Opening Weekend). When an X-Men movie (DOFP) does better than a Spider-Man movie (TASM2), something is wrong.