Official "Spider-Man 3: No Way Home" Thread (OPEN SPOILERS)

[Ed MOTHEREFFING G]

Post scene question

Yes, regarding the second question

 

[Kang Deezy]

The first half of the Movie was a mess and there are plot holes that’ll eventually get picked apart

 

[The Mad Titan]

Yes.

Spoiler

Yeah I figured, I really couldn't see them putting the pentagram etched into his forehead

 

[Sterling Archer]

The first half of the Movie was a mess and there are plot holes that’ll eventually get picked apart

At first I thought it was because we all were waiting for the shoe to drop with the reveals and then I realized that the film really was meh until the reveals and ramped up from there.

 

[8WON6]

Post scene question

Spoiler

Do you all think that was "cancer verse" strange? And that was shuma that we saw right?

Spoiler

it's the strange from What-If

 

[Ed MOTHEREFFING G]

Spoiler

Yeah I figured, I really couldn't see them putting the pentagram etched into his forehead

Yeah, i edited because im not certain regarding the universe but this

Spoiler

it's the strange from What-If

Is correct

 

[-DMP-]

Man I’m reading a lot of shyt on other boards can someone, who were more involved with the leaks, tell me if these are right?

Spoiler

read that there were more Matt Murdock scenes filmed but they were cut. Specifically showing him handling peters case.

Emma stone was supposed to be in it but couldn’t due to pregnancy

Kirsten was supposed to be in it but couldn’t due to Covid.

 

[FunkDoc1112]

But that’s Peter lol. Calling the plot bullshyt because he was in character making the normal mistakes he would make doesn’t make sense to me. He’s often his worst enemy because he can’t leave well enough alone. He makes it worse when trying to make it better. And pays the price.

That's what I hate about modern entertainment discourse. People act like characters aren't even allowed to make mistakes anymore. Any bad decision is an inconsistency, a contrivance or a plothole. People fukk up! We are often impulsive, short-sighted and reckless, which causes us to overcomplicate shyt for no reason. Hindsight is always 20/20

 

[8WON6]

But that’s Peter lol. Calling the plot bullshyt because he was in character making the normal mistakes he would make doesn’t make sense to me. He’s often his worst enemy because he can’t leave well enough alone. He makes it worse when trying to make it better. And pays the price.

nah the plot is bullshyt because (this is in the trailer so it's not a spoiler) when Peter interrupts Strange the first time, they both should have stopped and just talked about what exactly he wanted. They did the spell like they were in some huge rush. And at the end of the day Strange should have been like "nah, just deal with this shyt...you literally fought aliens before...you'll be aight". We know some of yall have this weird love of spiderman but don't just blindly defend this weak ass plot.

 

[MartyMcFly]

nah the plot is bullshyt because (this is in the trailer so it's not a spoiler) when Peter interrupts Strange the first time, they both should have stopped and just talked about what exactly he wanted. They did the spell like they were in some huge rush. And at the end of the day Strange should have been like "nah, just deal with this shyt...you literally fought aliens before...you'll be aight". We know some of yall have this weird love of spiderman but don't just blindly defend this weak ass plot.

But by your logic no comic book story would ever happen. The inciting incident is often someone or someones making mistakes. Either out of hubris, sympathy, or doing their jobs.

Strange said once he starts he can’t stop. So there was no stop let’s talk about it and figure out what you want.

 

[Lootpack]

Man I’m reading a lot of shyt on other boards can someone, who were more involved with the leaks, tell me if these are right?

Spoiler

read that there were more Matt Murdock scenes filmed but they were cut. Specifically showing him handling peters case.

Emma stone was supposed to be in it but couldn’t due to pregnancy

Kirsten was supposed to be in it but couldn’t due to Covid.

Spoiler

I know a courtroom scene with Matt Murdock was heavily rumored within the past few months. But according to Holland himself, a lot of ideas were dropped and the movie changed a bunch of times.

Also, those Dunst/Stone rumors always felt like BS to me. I remember those surfacing shortly after Dafoe, Molina, and Foxx were casted and they were coming from non-reputable, clickbait sites like WGTC.

 

[nieman]

I’ve said this before but I’ll say it again. Tobey and Tom match peoples idea of who Peter is. Andrew matches who peter actually is. Which is a big difference.

But Tobey played comics Peter great the way he was from inception up to around early 90s. That also would have been the Peter Tobey would have known growing up. Andrew is more of the modern interpretation of those characteristics...at least late 90s-on, which are ok, but I'm not really my era. They're both fine, just depends on which one resonates with you more.

I don't like Holland at all. The only thing I see is that he has the look of OG first appearance Peter Parker minus the glasses and clothing.

 

[8WON6]

But by your logic no comic book story would ever happen. The inciting incident is often someone or someones making mistakes. Either out of hubris, sympathy, or doing their jobs.

Strange said once he starts he can’t stop. So there was no stop let’s talk about it and figure out what you want.

You are wrong Villains will always have motivations, so you can still have comic book plots. This movie was about 2 people rushing through something for entirely no reason and they didn't even have to do "it". It's a weak ass plot.

 

[MartyMcFly]

You are wrong Villains will always have motivations, so you can still have comic book plots. This movie was about 2 people rushing through something for entirely no reason and they didn't even have to do "it". It's a weak ass plot.

I don’t think that’s a weak ass plot because it happens all the time. Whether it’s comics literature or just film in general. And if it’s in established character it’s fine for me. Strange had his reasons why he did what he did and he stated then to Peter. Obviously Peter is going to rush into it because, as strange says, he’s a kid and he often does that.

If you disagree with their reasonings that’s fine. But it’s within established character for both

 

[Lefty Gunz]

So MCU Peter never had an Uncle Ben ?