Scottie Drippin
Should Never Mention Me
Are they "his" enemies?how is tom holland supposed to beat all of his greatest enemies in one movie !
Are they "his" enemies?how is tom holland supposed to beat all of his greatest enemies in one movie !
He shoots them in the face with magical webs. Thee end.how is tom holland supposed to beat all of his greatest enemies in one movie !
I mean it makes sensejust finished running back the tobey spidermans
in 3 you could clearly tell they was just having fun out there. its graded too harshly, much like the dark knight returns
Just booked my plane ticket
USA brehs taking the L again having to wait 2 days before they can see it
DAY ONE
Wish they didn’t do that. But I’ve bytched about that movie enough and it was two decades ago nowI mean it makes sense
it was a guaranteed box office success, so 3 would be the one they would experiment with
Watching the original now
i forgot how WELL MADE this movie is. Its really tight, crisp, bright without being shiny if that makes sense...all the characters are very true to themselves...the pacing is perfect and it is edited very well. First time I've watched it in 9/10 years. About to get to BONESAW
EDIT: HEY its Octavia Spencer signing in Spiderman to the Bonesaw match! never knew she was in this.
The original especially after rewatching is the greatest origin comic movie ever...that was a tight telling of Spiderman's origin while building up his arch enemy and making the stakes feel major. It's a pantheon comic movie for sure and you're right regarding the cgi. It looks funny because it was 2002 but still fits which is amazing after 19 years.Not to start a fight or debate but the OGs will always be my favorite because they did some much very well. The CGI was incredible especially blending with the practical for the time. The storytelling was top notch and holds up to this day. They were personal stories for Peter Parker. Every character served a purpose. I was looking at the trailers the other day for all three and it dawned on me that pretty much all the characters had a story arc from 1-3, from Harry to Mary Jane to Aunt May and even Jameson. They all had stories and growth throughout the three films. All the villains had a personal connection to Peter one way or another, which made his triumphs have weight and allowed his character to really go through emotional arcs that had huge payoffs. These films will always be near and dear to my heart, not because they are just great Spider-man films, but because they are great films. Granted I am not a fan of Spider-man 3, but Spider-man 2 is heralded as one of the greatest comic book films and it deserves it. Despite Spider-Man 1’s criticisms nowadays most films only wish they could fill the shoes of what the movie was able to accomplish especially with the weight is carried on its shoulders to be good, let alone turn out to be a classic.
I hope Sam Raimi can bring the same magic to Dr. Strange 2. It’s his fundamental understanding of character and how storytelling mixed with a good script that can make all the difference.
Lastly, I can only hope that NWH learned what made the second half of FFH work and the combine that with the great elements from the Raimi trilogy.
Yeah my issues with Tobey and his interpretation aside, those first two are really dope movies. There’s no fat on the first and the second is a character driven movie worthy of one of the best Spider-Man stories ever.The original especially after rewatching is the greatest origin comic movie ever...that was a tight telling of Spiderman's origin while building up his arch enemy and making the stakes feel major. It's a pantheon comic movie for sure and you're right regarding the cgi. It looks funny because it was 2002 but still fits which is amazing after 19 years.