Trapperman Dave
Basil Fawty
So y’all think the directors cut gonna have the added scenes? Disappointed that much got cut
Wish I got paid to write.Good shyt. And since I get paid to write for a living I feel like I shouldn’t give criticism lol. I’ll peep after I see the movie tomorrow
Why do all the DCEU movies need a directors cut or an ultimate edition (minus WW) lately? This is an indicator of something wrong.So y’all think the directors cut gonna have the added scenes? Disappointed that much got cut
Hopefully WB don’t panic. They was fighting a bit of an uphill battle from the beginning and even more of one now that critics clearly have a vendetta against the universe. They need to stick to whatever plan they have and ride it out. The universe will pick up steam over time and if it doesn’t, who cares? Reset it after like ten years and do it again in like 2035.
Yeah, felt like shyt was left out.So y’all think the directors cut gonna have the added scenes? Disappointed that much got cut
These are the percentages of the critics who liked the film, not a score of the film.My only point is that Marvel flaws aren't taken seriously, they always use the "Good out weight the Bad" but with DC they aren't afforded that same luxury. That's what a Bias is, you judge something differently for one thing than the other. Let's look at Marvel 1st 5 Scores VS DC:
IM1 93% (Fair and nobody would argue that)
TIH 66 % (They can't be serious, this film had major issues and Marvel fans don't even acknowledge it today which is why Mark is playing Hulk)
IM2 73% (I guess I can slightly agree, I think it's closer to 60 than 75)
CATFA 81% (Fair but the film also had some flaws so it's more like a mid 70's)
Thor 77% (Nope, way too high)
Average: 78%
This show me that the critics gave Marvel a lot of leeway as they were starting out. They were giving passing to flaws in the films but it didn't effect the overall scores.
MOS 55% (MOS was LIGHTYEARS better than Superman R which got a better RT score)
BVS 27% (This score is when my antenna started to go off, something was fishy)
SS 26 % (Noticing a pattern yet?)
WW 93% (This was a checkmate, they couldn't do it again, everyone was on to them)
JL 37% ()
Average: 47.8%
This isn't about saying DCEU was flawless or perfect it's about seeing inconsistencies of judging one comic book movie verse the other. Also people love to bring up Box Office Success with Marvel. The Numbers already show DCEU is pacing way head of marvel for the 1st 5 Films.
muthafukkas are retardedThese are the percentages of the critics who liked the film, not a score of the film.
good cgi is when you dont even recognize its cgi. my example of good cgi is whatever team marvel/disney uses to de-age actorsI thought the movie was decent 75/10, (still need to see it a second time).
But quick question: A large majority of the Coli keeps saying in literally EVERY comic book movie thread, that there is bad CGI. What is good CGI? I know the Coli isn't the place where brehs nitpick just to nitpick, but I need a few solid examples. Its starting to sound like a cliched cop out.
the flash character can carry a movie better than superman or any other dc character not named batman.Flash was alright but never felt like he could carry his own movie
Blame the outcry that the DCEU was too dark and weren't fun like the Marvel movies, and that Snyder was ruining the DCEU.
good cgi is when you dont even recognize its cgi. my example of good cgi is whatever team marvel/disney uses to de-age actors
the flash character can carry a movie better than superman or any other dc character not named batman.
first off nikka, who the fukk you think you are to tell me how i should feel about this movie
second, i know damn well what steppenwolf is about, BUT i didnt really FEEL the way the portrayed him in the movie. point blank.