Hold on... HOLD IT... let me stop you right there. See, you are kinda revealing a lot here in this discussion. See, I said Aquaman made more than Captain Marvel because Captain Marvel is a franchise player in the MCU and everyone agreed that Cap Marvel was a huge success. So my point was look.. Aquaman was also a huge success..
But you took what I said and thought I was going a "stan" route with it and I wasn't. My comparison was valid because both movies came out around the same time and it was a point to prove that Aquaman did exceedingly well despite some here apparently trying to argue against that and push a narrative that it didn't...
And again, you are bringing up old shyt. Could Batman vs. Superman made more money? Sure, I don't know how much more. It made as much as Spider Man with Iron Man and those are two flagship characters so what more do they need. Maybe $875M should have been $1.2 billion? Maybe? So what?
You are continuing to bring up points that are irrelevant to the future of the studio. Batman was DEAD once before, remember? After the Jim Carrey movie the property was dead.... Nolan brought it back and adjusted for inflation it is still one of the biggest comic book franchises to date. You are acting like Batman can't be brought back.
Also by your definition Wonder Woman is a flagship character. She is part of the trinity.
How is Captain Marvel a franchise player in the MCU when she just made her first film appearances this year, at best she would be rookie of the year. The rest of your post is an attempt to ignore the recent history of DC in order to act as though the there aren't problems with their film studio. They had one good year with plans on the horizon. They've had plans that looked good on paper before and they were scrapped. Let's see how things turn out with this film before we say that all their problems are behind them.