Daenerys been ready to clap them flamers for a minute. Talkin bout returning cities to dirt. She always had someone talk sense into her though.
0:00-2:30
4:50-5:30
1:30-1:55
The three previous times she tried to rule benevolently all went to shyt, never garnered respect, and almost lost her life. She was literally looking at her lifelong objective and, considering the turn of events, couldn't afford any more half measures. On some Thanos shyt. Could it have been built up better? Sure, but it wasn't out of the realm of possibility.
Pretty much this. For example, there was plenty of foreshadowing that Stannis would burn his daughter. But the actual descent to him going from "no" to "yes" was not developed well enough.
In this same episode, Arya choosing not to pursue vengeance is actually my preferred character arc for her. There is foreshadowing that pure vengeance leads to your downfall. I've been hoping that was her ending for years now, and made plenty of posts before the season stating that I didn't want her to kill Cersei. So this isn't an instance of me not getting what I want when I say that the way the show handled it sucked.
Arya spent at least two weeks on the road with the Hound, presumably talking about killing Cersei, but then at the last second the hound goes "yeah, how about don't" and she just goes "thank you hound". Another instance of a great conclusion to her arc, but one that was poorly developed and rushed.
I don't have any problem with Dany's arc essentially being mad queen. But you have to execute it correctly or it feels unearned, undeveloped, and rushed.
Yes you can find forshadowing clues going back to the first season of her saying fire and blood. But you can also make a compilation video of her saying even more benevolent things about peace and and ruling with kidness. So at that point, once you've created the internal conflict, you have to develop enough character beats so that her arriving at fire and blood feels right.
You have to do the leg work to make it so a character that locked up both of her dragons because one child was killed would change so abruptly that she would systematically burn up to a million people alive.
Did they do that? I believe they think they did. How?
Well they put forth the idea that Westeros doesn't love her but instead they love Jon. But is that a good point to rest her entire descent upon? Because some northerners and wildlings toasted Jon at a feast? Do the Dornish not love her? Haven't they declared for her without even meeting her? What about all of the other regions not aligned with Cersei? Did the show just forget that Westeros is not just the north and kings landing?
If they want to make the case that she will find no love in Westeros, then they needed to do more to make this case. Otherwise it rests solely on some notheners and wildlings liking Jon and a catfight with Sansa, and that feels completely underdeveloped.
Not to mention, having her breaking point come when Jon refuses to kiss her is just really tone deaf writing.
One thing they did do effectively was take away her advisors and friends so she feels like she can't trust anyone. But that in itself is not enough of a connective tissue for her to systematically burn innocent people alive after she has won the war. No, that goes back to vengeance, jealousy, and hate because "these people don't love me" which, imo, was not developed enough. Full seasons could have helped develop it but again, this arc is a casualty of two shortened seasons that check off plausible plot points without developing them.