Thing is, none of that is stopping people for voting for Bernie, people just didn't vote for him. The "energy" has to materialize into actually voting.
You're pretty much saying that Bernie only had a chance with a bloated field of centrist candidates that were going to drop out anyway?
I'm not even disagreeing with you breh. I have no idea what would've happened. I'm just saying that we ran this experiment we're running today back in 2016 and lost, and we came damn close to losing today. I don't see why it would've been an awful idea to put the energy behind Bernie.
The GOP gets their team in fukking line when there's energy around a candidate. There was energy around Bernie. It was there. I know it didn't turn into enough votes, but the DNC could have done a lot more to rally their team around Bernie when they saw he had the energy. They damn new fought Bernie harder in 2016 and 2020 than they fought Trump. They fought like tooth and nail in the part, and on MSNBC and CNN, to make sure Bernie looked like a loser. They would try and spin the runner up in all the primaries as the actual winner instead of Bernie, etc.
I just don't see the harm in trying a different candidate. Clearly the American people are starving for something different. They've voted for a con man buffoon twice because they so desperately are sick of generic politicians. You can't tell me that you don't think people would rally around a candidate if their party told them to fall in line, especially if that candidate was offering MASSIVELY favorable platforms that all Americans want by large margins.
More than 50% of Republicans want M4A and you don't think that would resonate in this country during a Pandemic?
87% of Dems want it. Or fine. Don't run Bernie but at least steal his policy positions because they're massively popular even if he's not the guy to implement them.