rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
whats so funny to me about these debates is they remind me of rap battles lol but yet its supposed to be serious stuff that decides how we run the country, like kamalas line about the food fight was like a DNA freestyle. lmao and that prob gave her like 5 points in the poll. this country so fukkin stupid lol
Ayyyy. You literally took the post i was going to make yesterday. I just want to say it out loud. thats exactly what it is. Clowns ooing and awwing at weak rehashed one liners. no actual substance. no one is fact checking to see if the line even made sense. while everyone straight Bites one Mc's rap style and lyrics. How do you end up liking the copy cat rapper more than the real thing?
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
The only problem with Bernie is that as soon as he's elected, the rich will absolutely rip off the duct tape holding the economy together and let everything go to complete shyt so they can say "See? Don't elect socialists. Bad for economy. Very bad."
And so be it. I triple dare them to do it. You know why? Because being rich and staying rich without having to watch your back from regulars running up on you is still a very good life. Oh so they crying about not making 3 billion more. now they have to settle for 1.5 billion with bernie in office. I triple dare em to do it. It might be the best thing to ever happen to us if they do. would it be rough? yep. but it would make it a clear US vs THEM situation. no more playing around the reality of it. no more sugar coating it.
 

BoBurnz

Superstar
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
3,499
Reputation
800
Daps
16,171
Polling 101: never extrapolate anything or use them for forcasting.

Their purpose is to determine demographics to focus on in a campaign, not as a tool to project likely outcomes. Especially in a field with 5-6 viable candidates, they're functionally worthless as anything other than a tool to study demographic needs and a post-hoc analysis to show where campaigns missed trendlines in key demos. But people constantly use them to forecast because Nate Silver thinks there's some golden unbiased and plain to see electoral math when that's just not how any of this works. Data is never neutral, because people can interpret it based on their own notions and values, always remember that.

Most polling has 40-45% of people at this point who literally answer "no preference", they're junk for forecasting at this juncture.
 
Top