3. Reparations: there many different ways he could do reparations. He mentioned redlining but gave no solution to the problem. He could easily push for a program that give Black home owners grants to remodel their homes to help combat the property value lose Black home owners endured because of redlining. Along with that he could push for federal grants that help Black oriole with buying homes. This is just one idea. It doesn’t have to be direct check, and he doesn’t even have to call it reparations.
But that's now how redlining works. The laws don't say, "don't give loans to poor blacks. Only give them to poor whites."
Instead they pick areas that are disproportionately black and did not allow them HOLC mortgage lending.
Even today we can see this where areas are withheld services in disproportionately black or mintory areas.
So any law that offsets these issues would have to operate the same way.
The problem is, if you attack a law based on its racism, when offering redress you lose the ability to use the same surgical precision in crafting beneficial laws going forward.
I.e. To say that if we attack gerrymandering for in NC due to his surgically precise attack on blacks after you receive a ruling you can't go back and flip the script so that it does the exact opposite - - the judge will rule against you there as well for the same reasons.