Official Bernie Sanders HQ: Not Me, Us!

[Berniewood Hogan]

Spoiler: off topic

Hillary, before Bernie, had the most liberal platform in Democrat history

Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.

Democrats Advance Most Progressive Platform in Party History

Nope. Jesse Jackson's campaign was far more progressive than Hillary's.

And Bernie supported that brother.

And all this shyt about guns only makes Bernie more appealing to swing voters.

He's the perfect candidate.

 

[dh86]

Nope. Jesse Jackson's campaign was far more progressive than Hillary's.

And Bernie supported that brother.

And all this shyt about guns only makes Bernie more appealing to swing voters.

He's the perfect candidate.

Bernie is bulletproof amongst independents. That’s why Hillary and her acolyte DWS tried to squash open primaries

 

[DEAD7]

The most popular politician in Amerikkka isnt for reparations and supports Israel... shocking
Why does he still have supporters on the coli when other candidates are openly in favor of reparations???






That self hate...

 

[King Kreole]

ok the jumper wet

 

[South Paw]

Bernie haters big mad

#feelthebern

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

See guys. They wanted this smoke. Bernie is going to get vetted in a way he NEVER has before.

Lets see if he breaks. Hopefully that same standard will show him how heavy that crown really is.




Opinion | Bernie Sanders had it easy in 2016. That won't happen in 2020.


@88m3 @dtownreppin214 @Atlrocafella @johnedwarduado @panopticon

Zac Petkanas is a Democratic strategist, the president of Petkanas Strategies LLC and a former senior aide to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

​

So what? Maybe the objection here is that there is a policy of constant hostilities and provocations through American foreign policy. This isn't to say other countries don't do wrong, especially Russia, but the initial purpose of NATO was a counter to the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. Now, NATO is viewed as simply being anti-Russia and for what purpose instead of a cooperative relationship like Obama ran on during his first and second campaigns which was part of his appeal and also the cause of disappointments for folks when he decided he wanted to get involved in Regime change game. Trump was scoring points off of Hillary Clinton who was advocating no-fly zones in Syria when most people think we shouldn't be there. You dismiss this as the people not know what is good for them but you at the same time whine when you lost elections when rightly people don't view politicians as acting in their interests and instead of those of the "establishment" class.

The fact that, unsurprisingly to anyone with a brain, Trump is dishonest and a liar and looking to be more imperialistic in South America doesn't change the fact that fatigue over our actions for almost 2 decades exists in the public and that hasn't changed much. Folks such as yourself and those obsessed with the daily Russia melodrama related to Trump are so invested in the emotional satisfaction that caring about that shyt to the degree you do that you're wanting possible war over it. But like @the cac mamba said, most people don't give a fukk about this shyt and your type exist in an echo chamber that exists outside of the political desires of most of the public.

It will be interesting during the debates if the Venezuela issue is still around who advocates Trump's action despite hating Trump so much and who doesn't. I'm willing to bet your girl Kamala cosigns and your arch-nemesis Bernie Sanders and even Tulsi Gabbard are the few dissenting voices in the crowd. The public will see who continues to be establishment whores and who actually advocates changing course. I'd be happy to be proven wrong but the style of politics practiced by folks like Kamala doesn't tell me she will buck the trend here.

Whats the point of this rant?

I want democrats who are not weak on Russian aggression. Its really that simple for me.

Venezuela is up in the air for me, personally.

Sanders supported a bunch of communists in the 80s like Ortega in Latin America...so I'd be too careful before thinking Sanders has the right policy outlook here.

 

[Ya' Cousin Cleon]

​

 

[Dr. Acula]

Whats the point of this rant?

I want democrats who are not weak on Russian aggression. Its really that simple for me.

Venezuela is up in the air for me, personally.

Sanders supported a bunch of communists in the 80s like Ortega in Latin America...so I'd be too careful before thinking Sanders has the right policy outlook here.

Your idea of not weak is to be at constant hostilities. Like I said, your girl and Obama didn't think this was a terrible idea when the Republicans were at the place you're at now about normalizing relations. Bernie advocates for it and he is a Russian agent.

Also, oh no, Sanders supported the people of Nicaragua in overthrowing their corrupt previous government and supported the side that Reagan through Iran-contra was against. That's pretty consistent with his ideas.

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

You centrist pieces of shyt gonna be MAD when AOC endorses Bernie and hands him the nomination

oh nooo...the big AOC endorsement, because everyone across the dem base is hanging on her every tweet

 

[Paper Boi]

Is everyone not named sanders a centrist?

nah, most centrists are reasonable you a conservative weirdo opp with severe autism.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

other candidates are openly in favor of reparations

the only one i'm aware of is oprah's "spiritual adviser"

do you think she has a shytless street's chance in india of getting elected?

also, the big question for the ados people: do you believe a democrat who runs on reparations will beat the republican?

you know a good chunk of white dem voters will abstain or switch if reparations is on the platform

not me, i'm FOR reparations. but many cacs will say "not outta my paycheck, too long ago, lebron is rich, etc."

so logically, what are the likely outcomes of a successful ados campaign? get the dem to support reparations, lose significant white votes, trump re-elected. fail to get the dem to support reparations, lose the votes of 300 people on the internet who probably weren't voting anyway, Bernie in the white house. somehow accidentally get TRUMP to support reparations, Trump re-elected while rednecks try to figure out how and why Mexico will pay for it.

 

[ogc163]

​

Dixon gonna be on one this year.

 

[DEAD7]

the only one i'm aware of is oprah's "spiritual adviser"

do you think she has a shytless street's chance in india of getting elected?

also, the big question for the ados people: do you believe a democrat who runs on reparations will beat the republican?

you know a good chunk of white dem voters will abstain or switch if reparations is on the platform

not me, i'm FOR reparations. but many cacs will say "not outta my paycheck, too long ago, lebron is rich, etc."

so logically, what are the likely outcomes of a successful ados campaign? get the dem to support reparations, lose significant white votes, trump re-elected. fail to get the dem to support reparations, lose the votes of 300 people on the internet who probably weren't voting anyway, Bernie in the white house. somehow accidentally get TRUMP to support reparations, Trump re-elected while rednecks try to figure out how and why Mexico will pay for it.

The goal is to push the idea forward the way Bernie has done socialism.
Bernie was f*cked by Dems last election but his message(s) has shape this election.
Focusing on who can win shouldn’t be the objective... moving the discussion and country closer to redress, and reprieve for African Americans should be the top priority for any self respecting African American.

Uplifting everyone(m4a, free college, etc.) including the cacs who have shytted on us for centuries should be a distant second.


Hopefully you’re cac savior Bernie gets on board.

 

[ROFLOCO]