I'm not even tryna flex but they were shytting on us hard when she was breaking through in the polls. Some of them are blaming us except Pete is stealing her soft support in Iowa. College educated whites have moved from Harris to Warren and now Pete.
Talking about Warren's Medicare-for-all messaging is an assault? I've talked with Kreole multiple times in here about it just fine. Bernie Bros aren't the only people in American who are talking about it. It's a serious life or death issue that people want clarity on.
Its okay for cable news and big time columnists to dunk on Bernie everyday and say supporting Bernie over Warren is sexist
But as soon as an anonymous forum poster or some random YouTuber talks about Warren's message on health care, foreign policy or something else its you all must stop attacking "Warren's record”. I'm obviously for Bernie and against Biden but both of them have withstood multiple, long winded negative news cycles. Warren hasn't been through one since the DNA test. This public teacher shyt barely registered and the N.A. stuff won't get brought up unless she makes the general.
If you think a candidate or anyone else shouldn't be questioned on things because it'll re-elect Trump then you'll be in for a surprise when the Republican machine digs up something that tanks them in the general because we were too scared to talk about it. This reeks of Kamala's campaign shouting how dare you when anyone mentioned her criminal justice record because she was gaining in the polls and everybody was "this helps Trump"but thankfully she got got. You better acknowledge or deal with this stuff now.
Some of her supporters trying to deflect from criticism are echoing those used in 2016.[/QUOTE]
Intervention definitely doesn't either because it comes along with civilian casualties.
Besides plan yoga and Hindu conferences with fellow Hindus Tulsi hasn't supported Hindu extremists either. And newsflash :India is our ally in the region she isn't doing anything past presidents haven't done. It's a weak point to make.
Let Iraqis solve Iraq's problems. Unless you believe in American exceptionalism or something ?You wouldn't want a foreign nation coming into the US trying to solve a humanitarian problem would you?
y'all are 1 trick ponies...who in this conversation is advocating for military intervention...it's almost like you guys don't understand there are multiple ways to affect the quality of life of a foreign population 
So you are saying you would welcome another nation into the US to solve our immigration or police brutality or human trafficking problems (all humanitarian US problems)?
"let Iraqis solve Iraq's problems" is exactly what I would expect from someone not concerned with the material reality of average Iraqis
If your politics stops at your borders you are a nationalist. You can't be an anti-imperialist nationalist
Upgrade your politics.
We started our conversation with me quoting this shyt right here. Tulsi is talking about the military. You are now moving the goal posts to what talking about NGOs, the Peace Corp, the United Nations?!bro get that hindu nationalist and genocidal maniac out of here
Pulling out of a region and creating a power vacuum and "ending war adventures" sounds good until you realize that that's just another way to empower dictators and authoritarians
What is she talking about in regards to the citizens and cultural upheaval? Anyone can end a war. How are you going to show love to the people?
Like I said update your politics. The goal of ending military intervention is not to ONLY end military intervention. I've explained this for 3 posts now. If you are anti-intervention and not anti-imperialist then you do not understand the causes of military intervention and you actually do not care about the PEOPLE being affected by military intervention.
I said a white nation? I didn't, but you assumed that's what I meant or that's the only scenario you are willing to consider? Check yourself B, you seem to believe in some type of exceptionalism that may not be about countries but uh something else.
At this point you're pretty much confirming you're an alt right disinformation alias.I said a white nation? I didn't, but you assumed that's what I meant or that's the only scenario you are willing to consider?
Check yourself B, you seem to believe in some type of exceptionalism that may not be about countries but uh something else.
My politics are fine thanks for the recommendation tho. I think they are one in the same otherwise what are we talking about? Trade deals? NGOs, the UN? You aren't being specific enough what you mean. I asked this one post ago.
Hmmm . . . there is a country with the second largest population in the world and our biggest trading foe and has the second largest military in the world as well that isn't white. I guess you don't know about it or figure they are incapable but I'll let you tell it.
But I'm the disinformation alias?
and reporters are sitting on the Native stuff cause they're waiting to see if she makes the general. Our media is disgusting and they will smear her with it when Trump and the RNC try to set the narrative.
He's a media creation and connected with the right billionaire donors that have connections to boost him. He also has the Kennedy gimmick going so people like that. It's not a coincidence that he's gaining with 50 and older voters that watch cable news. CNN/MSNBC talk about him for multiple segments a day about how great he is and how he's surging in early states cause he's not a socialist and people want moderation
He dumped a shytload of money in Iowa and Warren is sinking fast, I guess he is picking up her white college educated base. I doubt it lasts.
Good point about the media and the meeting. He is the mayor of a college town who got 8000 people to vote for him to win. But is now elevated to being in that room with Democratic leadership just means he is handpicked by some powerful people.
