JMurder
SOHH Member since 01...
In a perfect, upgraded service area, T-Mobile is fast. The problem is those are few and far between. Plus, T-Mobile uses high wavelength spectrum, which penetrates walls for shyt, compounding the problem. And AT&T won't be upgrading their hspa+ since they've started going LTE. That 700 mhz LTE (vzw, at&t) is where it's at.
If you live in a great T-Mobile area and don't travel, awesome. Many people, myself included, are just shocked that Google would not include an LTE version. They've been pushing the technology boundary this whole time, and this just feels like a step back. That's the main issue I think.
I feel like come the first of the year they'll try to do something for nexus fans on big red. We'll see.
There's nothing to be shocked about. The Nexus program was never about porting about the best device. It was about putting out a developers phone with a stock version of Android that served as an example of what manufacturers should standardize. A few important factors go along with this goal: a) no bloatware, b) no carrier branding, and most importantly c) instant updates. There is simply NO WAY at this point for Google to release a dev phone through CDMA carriers while maintaining the integrity of Nexus devices.
Now I see people up in arms about no LTE forgetting that Google did this a year ago with both Verizon and Sprint in an experiment that completely and utterly failed. Verizon not only delayed the OTA updates for the Nexus, but they didn't even promote the device to make it worth Google's time. In case you guys weren't aware, CDMA carriers were the last to update their Nexus devices. That just doesn't go along with the goal here.
So I'll end with this... if one of the most important things to you isn't getting the latest Android updates, them sorry, this phone isn't for you. And no, Google shouldn't release a LTE version because it's "standard."
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2