Official 007: NO TIME TO DIE Thread

[MartyMcFly]

Man reading some of the comments on reddit about this movie is just the movie isn't perfect but some people want EVERY single little thing explained otherwise "it's a plot hole" or "it's bad writing". Like Ana de Armas saying she had 3 weeks of training, to me she was clearly being sarcastic after what we saw

Most people who comment online don’t know what plot hole actually is. They just throw out terms they hear in reviews.

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

Spoiler: Don’t Look If You Haven’t Seen It Yet

The significance of Bond being in Jamaica is because that is where Ian Fleming’s retired on an estate named Goldeneye and wrote James Bond.

Wow!! Dope and significant.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

But then the series would play into the fan theory of the code name. Which they’ve never abided by. Up until Daniel, James Bond was one timeline with one cat. Daniel’s bond was the first break in the timeline and reboot, who is now his own separate closed loop timeline

I disagree. Like I said earlier, I think this Bond is the same Bond from the last 50 years. And they ended that with this movie. The next movie will probably start the codenames, if at all.

Spoiler

Or they can do some wild shyt, like say Bond got blown by the blast, scarred terribly, and had major reconstructive surgery. Hell since he has nanobots in him, they can say they reprogrammed them and made them heal him too.

 

[MartyMcFly]

I disagree. Like I said earlier, I think this Bond is the same Bond from the last 50 years. And they ended that with this movie. The next movie will probably start the codenames, if at all.

Spoiler

Or they can do some wild shyt, like say Bond got blown by the blast, scarred terribly, and had major reconstructive surgery. Hell since he has nanobots in him, they can say they reprogrammed them and made them heal him too.

But that doesn’t make sense. And by sense I mean that’s not what they’ve ever said. Listen to those podcasts. They said straight up this closes the loop on daniels iteration of the character. It’s a five movie arc that’s its own thing inside a larger franchise.

I feel that you disagree. I get that. But there’s words straight from the mouths of those who write and produce the flicks that say otherwise. Idk what else to say breh

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

are you KIDDING me?

 

[Max.]

 

[Roid Jones]

I disagree. Like I said earlier, I think this Bond is the same Bond from the last 50 years. And they ended that with this movie. The next movie will probably start the codenames, if at all.

Spoiler

Or they can do some wild shyt, like say Bond got blown by the blast, scarred terribly, and had major reconstructive surgery. Hell since he has nanobots in him, they can say they reprogrammed them and made them heal him too.

Code names and other wacky ideas are fun to talk aboutbut it won't happen, there will be a new Bond and new stories will be told

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Code names and other wacky ideas are fun to talk aboutbut it won't happen, there will be a new Bond and new stories will be told

Did I say there wouldn't be?

 

[NobodyReally]

I enjoyed it, but I thought the first half was much more interesting than the last half. Something was missing. The whole reveal and end didn't really hit the way it was supposed to for me.

Spoiler: Spoiler

I just didn't care that that was his daughter or for the use of a child to raise the stakes and make the situation more intense felt cheap. Also that 'Rogue One' ending did not have the emotional impact it was supposed to, at least for me. In fact, all it did was remind me of 'Rogue One' and how amazing the ending of that movie was lol. I don't know, I feel like I should have been sadder or something. I was just like 'oh, this is it, huh? ::shrug::: I also really hated the new 007 telling M to reinstate James as 007. It felt so forced and like they were pandering to the haters who didn't want Nomi replacing Bond.

But overall, I was entertained.

I'd give this a 7/10.

 

[Jello Biafra]

Man reading some of the comments on reddit about this movie is just the movie isn't perfect but some people want EVERY single little thing explained otherwise "it's a plot hole" or "it's bad writing". Like Ana de Armas saying she had 3 weeks of training, to me she was clearly being sarcastic after what we saw

Every film subreddit is full of overly pedantic buzz kills who all think they are Roger Ebert reincarnated.

 

[Roid Jones]

They’re def doing something with the bond ip
They’ll strong arm eon at some point

Animated Q Branch spinoff show for the kids

 

[Roid Jones]

Remember when “James Bland” was getting all types of heat for taking on the role

Sad thing is some of those people are still hating

 

[humminbird]

are you KIDDING me?

come to the ana de amas jbo thread

 

[Jello Biafra]

I disagree. Like I said earlier, I think this Bond is the same Bond from the last 50 years. And they ended that with this movie. The next movie will probably start the codenames, if at all.

Spoiler

Or they can do some wild shyt, like say Bond got blown by the blast, scarred terribly, and had major reconstructive surgery. Hell since he has nanobots in him, they can say they reprogrammed them and made them heal him too.

Spoiler

I doubt they will turn "James Bond" into a code name or even continue this film series continuity at all aside from probably keeping the Ana de Armas character and Ben Whishaw as Q.

I am thinking they will go for a younger (but still established Bond) with casting for the new Bond being kept between 30-35 years old.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

come to the ana de amas jbo thread

where's the link???