Not to scare you are anything but even with the missile defense, there's a very good chance that the nuclear missile would get through. These days nuclear missiles are very advanced. To get more "bang for your buck" multiple warheads are no attached to a single missile. When it gets high enough, the warheads separate and then re-enters the atmosphere. So the only way to stop it, being realistic, is to get it before the warheads separate from each other.stay home, watch the Lakers game. Rather die in an explosion than suffer with years of cancer from the fallout.
Besides, the Navy spends billions on deploying the AEGIS missile network in Hawaii. Navy destroyers all over Hawaii have an umbrella of protection over the state. That shyt just better work, because that money could have been spent on healthcare or free college tuition.
Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle - Wikipedia
The introduction of MIRV led to a major change in the strategic balance. Previously, with one warhead per missile, it was conceivable that you could build a defense that used missiles to attack individual warheads. Any increase in missile fleet by the enemy could be countered by a similar increase in interceptors. With MIRV, a single new enemy missile meant that multiple interceptors would have to be built, meaning that it was much less expensive to increase the attack than the defense. This cost-exchange ratio was so heavily biased towards the attacker that the concept of mutual assured destruction became the leading concept in strategic planning and ABM systems were severely limited in the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in order to avoid a massive arms race.