[NSFW] Savage ass DC nikkas fukk a thot outside the club

[William F. Russell]

i'm not in the law field, but a chick thats clearly impaired cant give legal consent. if this shyt went to the courts,a jury would agree that she wasn't not legally capable of consenting. chick honestly looks someone gave her GHB. talkin bout she bout to throw up and all types of shyt.

although it would be a hard case to win, i wouldn't want to be a guy in that situation. especially since she told several nikkas "no" and "stop"

1. Use the black letter law, not the Cornell Hearing Board, to determine what constitutes rape. If an intoxicated person gives consent is WHETHER THE PERSON'S INTOXICATION IMPAIRED HER/HIS ABILITY TO CONSENT. Period.

2. Again, when it comes to intoxication and alleged rape, courts operate on a case by case basis and examine the details. Here the girl willingly had sex with multiple people while bragging that she loves sex and wants to be fukked. The only time she says "no" was when a guy asked for brains. But then she proceeded to give somebody else oral sex; she was never forced. She never refused to engage in sex. She willingly approached multiple men to have sex with them. Nobody forced himself on her. She never physically resisted sex with any of them. How did her underwear get on the ground? Why did she never attempt to run away or fight back? And you fail to acknowledge that the men were under the influence. If all parties are under the influence, then it's a moot issue.

3. You're shifting goalposts by asking whether anybody would want to be in the men's shoes. Of course not. But that doesn't mean they engaged in rape.

4. She wasn't raped. She was just made to look like a dirty slut. And the dudes looked like thirsty losers.

 

[Ayo]

WRONG.

The key question is still: did the victim consent or not? Regardless of whether the victim was drunk or sober, if the sex is nonconsensual, it is rape. However, each state has different definitions of “nonconsensual”
.

No sense in arguing with people like you. I already stated what the federal law was. If the person is deemed to be impaired consent doesn't matter.

10 U.S. Code § 920 - Art. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally
(b)Sexual Assault.— Any person subject to this chapter who—
(3)commits a sexual act upon another person when the other person is incapable of consenting to the sexual act due to—
(A) impairment by any drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance, and that condition is known or reasonably should be known by the person; or

Keywords here.... incapable of consent due to impairment by a intoxicant (aka alcohol).......and that condition is known or REASONABLE should be known by the person

The questions isn't about her saying "yes" or "no". That's not what "incapable" refers to here. It refers to her decision making abilities. Not her vocal chords.

If us sitting here typing can tell that she was drunk are you telling me those nikkas can't tell that she's drunk?

The law doesn't say "kind of impaired, or partially impaired". It says "impaired"...which this bytch clearly was.

Arm chair lawyers head that way

 

[Mac]

Oh surprise surprise....another street-urchin hairhat

who would give up the post-club parking lot box cuz a nicca "looked good". But this one is clean with her sanitizer always in tote Im sure. The Walking Contradiction ladies and gentleman.

First of all a$$hole, I am having fun and can post whatever I please on this site. Did I say I would give any sexual gratification to this young man? No, did I point out that he was attractive? Yes. I do not even frequent nightclubs. That photo in my avi isn't me. I am in a wonderful relationship btw. I don't even know why I am responding to you... I'm sure you are one of those parking lot clowns who chase these kind of women anyways. Get out of your feels please.

 

[Family Man]

Ignore the shyt that goes on at them cac frat parties y'all....

Is that the "Bu..bu..but..CACs do it too" defense?

 

[William F. Russell]

chick is going to accuse all them nikkas of rape and i think shes got a good case

Nope.

You're a stubborn dude who cannot admit he's wrong. By your own admission, you don't know the law. I do. It's my profession. I told you what the proper definition of rape was yet you continue to spew nonsense.

At worst, a rape charge gets filed. But it won't be rape.

 

[bl2k8]

I'm thought they would have been ID'd by now

 

[William F. Russell]

How is that overeaching(?)/overeacting (?) Have you been accused of rape before or had someone lie on you about rape? I have had that happen to someone close to me and even though he was found innocent in the end it was a big mess. He got kicked out of school, lost credits, had his reputation dragged through the mud etc...so yea, no I don't take it lightly and think it is something to avoild if you can't especially a for quick nut and in this case possible STD's from some random.

As for the rest You changed your post because you know its not just about consent it is the intoxication part which was my point because people are in here saying she said yes so its not rape.

Whatever, the point is that you and others have misstated the law and I've been stating the law correctly.

Everything else in your post is emotion.

 

[William F. Russell]

thank you.

she clearly uses those 2 words in the video.

EDIT: I'll let the stupid rot in their stupidity.

 

[Elle Driver]

I'ma throw up.

 

[Ayo]

Breh, take it from a lawyer: this isn't rape.

Sounds like something Ahern said lol

 

[William F. Russell]

No sense in arguing with people like you. I already stated what the federal law was. If the person is deemed to be impaired consent doesn't matter.



Keywords here.... incapable of consent due to impairment by a intoxicant (aka alcohol).......and that condition is known or REASONABLE should be known by the person

The questions isn't about her saying "yes" or "no". That's not what "incapable" refers to here. It refers to her decision making abilities. Not her vocal chords.

If us sitting here typing can tell that she was drunk are you telling me those nikkas can't tell that she's drunk?

The law doesn't say "kind of impaired, or partially impaired". It says "impaired"...which this bytch clearly was.

Arm chair lawyers head that way

This is a federal case?

Edit: if filed in DC, federal law applies.

But to your point, you're engaging in semantics. I never said anything about levels of intoxication. All I said is that when there's consent under intoxication, the question becomes whether the intoxication impaired her ability to consent.

Your reading comprehension is piss-poor and you need to stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[killacal]

Breh, take it from a lawyer: this isn't rape.

 

[Ayo]

This is a federal case?

No but it is D.C. The superior court is funded and operated by the feds.

Get your paralegal skills up Breh. I'm killing you with my Pre-Law track BA in PoliSci knowledge.

***Waits while SuperCoolP Googles up a storm****

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

Is that the "Bu..bu..but..CACs do it too" defense?

I'm right though....black men get generalized for being sexually aggressive yet of course the same doesn't apply to white males.

But of course you know this and you on ya shyt...

So carry on fukkboy.

 

[JayGatsby]

at the dude fingering away....

lord knows he sniffed his finger

probably got something to eat at MC'ds after.....

hands all up in ya fries, nitpicking at ya nuggets