[NSFW] Savage ass DC nikkas fukk a thot outside the club

[Kane1]

None of them even used a condom, std all around when will nikkas learn.

That AIDS tho......

 

[O.T.I.S.]

And then they went home and fukked their wives, girlfriends.

Exactly why my ass was on that and chilled in Nova instead of DC/MD. Ratchet shyt happened in Fairfax, like almost the entire Fire Dept doing anal on a chick in the bathroom stall of a bar in Herndon, BUT she wasnt drunk or a stranger, but a coworker, and it wasn't filmed. She later married.

Seriously, How could they not feel, smell, or hear that red pulsating sore, I mean "ingrown hair bump".

Like whiteboys don't do the same shyt or worse


And to people saying this isn't rape... Yes, it is. You clearly heard the chick say she was going to throw up. Regardless if she knew she had some shyt on her puss.. These nikkas was stupid as fukk.

I've seen nikkas drag drunk corpses out the clubs.. I've seen Spanish dudes do it, I've seen WHITE BOYS do it (they were some of the worse ones in the military, raping chicks in foreign countries and shyt).

But these nikkas not only did it, they recorded it and put it online. If she does want to claim that shyt, they'll gladly try to put these nikkas under the jail for doing this shyt and nikkas should know this by now you would think

 

[William F. Russell]

Some of y'all are missing the point. Regardless of what she says on the tape, she is clearly drunk/impaired the law say that is rape. If I was a black man, I would not be around this situation hoe or not. They are looking for a reason to lock you up. Don't help them

The key question is still: did the victim consent or not? Regardless of whether the victim was drunk or sober, if the sex is nonconsensual, it is rape.

If an intoxicated person consents, the question becomes whether the victim's consent was impaired by intoxication.

Stop misinterpreting the law.

 

[marcuz]

TBH, she seems less drunk and more about spreading that herp because she's unhappy with herself.

She knew her vag had big ass blister. That's why she took her panties off and threw them under the car even though the sex wasn't even happening near that part of the car. She knew her panties were bloodied. And she knew she wasn't on her period so she knew that she had a real problem down there.

She was purposely trying to burn nikkas and they fell for it out of desperation and thirst for puss, or perhaps trying to look cool for the brehs.

Imagine being there to actually witness your boy catch the herp. Hell nah you can't hit this blunt nikka

herpes aint going to make a woman risk getfin HIV. i do believe shes purposely spreading diseases as well, just not herpes

 

[marcuz]

The key question is still: did the victim consent or not? Regardless of whether the victim was drunk or sober, if the sex is nonconsensual, it is rape.

Stop misinterpreting the law.

women cant consent while impaired

 

[Canon]

look at this queen

 

[William F. Russell]

women cant consent while impaired

Not true.

If that's the case, if you and your girl are drinking/smoking and y'all proceed to have sex, are you a rapist?

Again, with intoxication and the question of rape, the ultimate determination is whether the intoxication impaired the victim's ability to consent (if s/he consents).

 

[dontreadthis]

watched this foolery this morning and that sore has been stuck in my mind all day

 

[DaChampIsHere]

She doesn't look to be any drunker than the guys in the video in reality. She's very good at balancing herself, changing positions, standing up on her own, asserting herself against insults, making demands and orders, etc. She knows what's going on, even though she's dumb for participating.

All of them are equally "drunk" and making bad decisions here. I don't think this would last in court, but I ain't no lawyer though so

herpes aint going to make a woman risk getfin HIV. i do believe shes purposely spreading diseases as well, just not herpes

Idk what that shyt was. She just seems like she doesn't give a fukk at all.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

I don't really feel bad for anyone in this video. Everyone got what they wanted. She got attention, they got herpes. W all around.

 

[Mountain]

As usual on this site, we have a number of posters who are convicting people of crimes without any actual knowledge of the law. Y'all embarrass yourself accusing people of rape when y'all don't even know what constitutes rape. I hate that the term "rape" is thrown around so liberally, especially when there are serious ramifications for those accused of rape.

Rape is an individual's unconsented penetration of another. Depending on the situation, an individual under the influence of alcohol may not be able to give consent. In cases involving the use of alcohol by either party (or both), the prosecution/court will examine the cases on an case-by-case basis and pay close attention to specific details in order to make a determination of whether a rape occurred.

Here, there is no doubt that the female in the video consented to all of the sex acts in which she engaged. First, she's caught on video repeating that she loves having sex. Second, she willingly engaged in oral sex (even AFTER she said she didn't want to) and vaginal sex with each male. Also, she never said "no" or "stop" before or during sex at any point in the video. There were no statements of objection by her. Finally, there were no signs of physical resistance by her against the men at any of the respective times when a male penetrated her.

The fact that she was under the influence will ultimately mean nothing. First, there is no proof that any of the individuals either knew she was drunk. There is no proof that any individuals supplied her with any alcohol/drugs. Also, there is no proof that the female was even under the influence when she engaged in those acts. Moreover, even if it was proven that the female was in fact under the influence, the defendant(s) can argue that they were under the influence themselves (someone was caught with a marijuana blunt in the video) and, thus, that negates any idea that they were taking advantage of an intoxicated female' supposed inability to consent. In the totality of the situation, these points plus her behavior and statements in the video show that she voluntarily consented to having sex and that her (supposed) intoxication didn't impair her ability to consent.

In no way, shape, or form am I condoning the actions of any of the individuals in the video. All parties involved are disgusting and morally null individuals. However, the argument that the female was raped is legally deficient.

If the female has any ounce of regret, she'll file a rape charge. A reasonable prosecutor will, at the very least, be weary of prosecuting this incident as a rape case (or could very well refuse to prosecute it period). And if a rape case is prosecuted, a court will ultimately find that no rape occurred throughout the video. Unfortunately, however, once the rape charge is filed, the damage will have already been done and the reputation of everybody in the video will be irreversibly tarnished.

This is truly a disgusting and sad situation but this isn't rape.

I agree, never understood how a bytch can claim rape if all parties involved were under the influence and fckin consensually.

 

[marcuz]

Not true.

If that's the case, if you and your girl are drinking/smoking and y'all proceed to have sex, are you a rapist?

Again, with intoxication and the question of rape, the ultimate determination is whether the intoxication impaired the victim's ability to consent (if s/he consents).

technically, yeah. she could say i raped her while she was drunk and high. there's a clear double standard, dont get me wrong. but its clear the chick wasnt in the right state of mind to legally consent.

 

[Da King]

The most pathetic part of the video was the cameraman turning the video on himself and smoking thinking he was the coolest nikka alive

 

[William F. Russell]

technically, yeah. she could say i raped her while she was drunk and high. there's a clear double standard, dont get me wrong. but its clear the chick wasnt in the right state of mind to legally consent.

The hypothetical girl could if she did NOT consent. If she did consent, she would have to show that she wouldn't have sex with you absent drinking and smoking.

The behavior and statements of the girl in the video show that her consent wasn't impaired. And the men in the video clearly were intoxicated themselves.

 

[Diondon]

lol this turned into a rape debate?