you ain't shyt for this
The other virgin on the board has the same approach to social media.
). Beyond that though facebook is done unless they diversify through acquisitions. 1.4 Billion in R&D last year to change the news feed 5 times and create Facebook home? 
I dont understand how corporations are stupid enough to continue spending money using its advertising especially when it doesnt tailor ads to the user. The less users that use facebook, the less data about us that corporations can use to create advertise. Smmfh. Facebook Home is gonna jolt its revenue but when it dies down after this year I'm going short. I might have to drop 10K on this . I dont even care if I lose it, its worth the risk. 
. It doesnt make sense 
. Double the size of Priceline too.
Facebook is the world's largest human index. It's more valuable than we know right now. You have no clue what Facebook is upto in its labs.Deleted mine last summer. I'm telling all of you fukkboys to go short on the company. I'm buying 2015 put options at a strike of 15 and 20. Gonna hedge the risk by buying a small amount of underlying shares and by buying shares of Twitter once it goes public.
The only thing that scares me is the cash/equivalents on its balance sheet (2 and 7 billion respectively
They got this company being bigger than 3 times larger than Adobe. A company who although is much older is diversified, invests more in R&D, has a history of products that are actually useful to businesses and has double Facebooks operating income on 80% of the revenue. This same Adobe is past its growth phase trading at an all time high (right above where it was before the dot com bubble) but is still 3 times smaller than facebook
Who wants to see a girl posing in front of a mirror or eating a desert on their homescreen? The ratings are even an avg of 2.2/5 stars on Google Play. Only the beginning but I just dont see how it can really catch on.
Dude, you have no fvcking clue about what Facebook really is.Thats the only thing that scares me, it has a fukkload of cash that it can use to do some wild shyt. But from an accounting perspective...there is no way the company should be larger than Priceline or Adobe in my opinion.
Everybody in here will agree that the usage of Facebook was at its peak in 2010/2009. The amount of users may have enlargened but thats only because it started allowing preteens and teenagers to join. Do they account for the fake sexy girls profiles that are used to troll people or send viagara advertisements? Do they account for the accounts that are made by teenage mothers for babies who cant even type on a keyboard? How about the accounts made by party promoters and shyt. Furthermore people dont even click the ads! It's a scam. But if they diversify their product offering then i'll be toast. But right now over 90% of revenue is from its advertising.
They spent 1.4B on R&D last year compared to 0.4B in 2011. I'm curious to see just where the hell that R&D actually went though. Adobe spent a total of 1.5B for R&D in the same period. Only difference is that where Adobe spends this money developing or creating new business lines; facebook spends this money finding new ways to add to its current one (ie: FB Home being a new avenue for advertisements). All anything like that is gonna do is annoy users further. Who really wants to slide their phone and have advertisements on their home screen??
Priceline doesnt even invest in R&D and its margin is still increasing every year. This is a company I remember my dad telling me about when the Internet first became mainstream, 10 years of organic growth after the bubble in the making.
I might be a hater but I dunno...Facebook is just a gimmick to me. Even if they acquire Twitter. How long can Twitter and Instagram really last?
