NFL 100 anniversary team QB finalists

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,485
Reputation
6,125
Daps
45,063
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
I can't really argue with the Top 10. The only person I'd really debate would be Otto Graham. Guy only played 10 seasons, maybe 25+ years ago that was enough to still make you still Top 10, but considering the number of guys who have had a profound impact at the position since the mid-90s, you have to bump Graham off...

So just to speak on a couple guys cats in here are saying should have made it:

•Moon is an All-Timer, but he ain't Top 10. Dude is a career .500 QB (102-101) with a losing playoff record (3-7). He was physically and cerebrally gifted at the position but too often he put up numbers with mediocre results. That ain't Top 10...

•Russ could possibly make his way to Top 10 status. He's only in Year 8, and with the longevity of the modern QB, he probably has a good decade left, the entire '20s. I do think he's probably done enough to already be considered a Top 30 All-Timer, and he only climbs from there, but he ain't sniffing Top 10 yet...

•Young, Kelly, and Rodgers are the top two guys you could argue should replace Graham. In the case of Young, you have to consider a few things:

He only won one of his rings as The Guy. You take away his '94 Super Bowl run, he has a losing playoff record. Also, 8 of his 15 years he played fewer than 12 games. Part of that was he had to back up Montana, the other part is he was injury prone relative to the other elite QBs we discuss. So with Young we are really evaluating the 7 years he played full schedule or close to it, you run into the Graham argument, in a sense...

Pound for pound, you can make the argument Young is the most accurate passer of all time, and he was athletic as hell. He won big games with few meltdowns, so the years he was truly elite, is why you can make the case he belongs. But I understand why he didn't make the cut...

•Warner was a great player at his best, but he's a guy who shouldn't even be in The Hall. In a 12-year career, he spent 6 years right in the middle of it as a part time backup to guys like Eli and Leinart, and in that 2002-2007 stretch, when he did start, he was 13-29. 13 and fukking 29. His last two years and that Bowl run in Arizona saved his reputation, he's one of the easier guys to see why he ain't up there. He's overrated...

•Fouts was arguably better than Warner, for sure a Top 5 guy at his peak, but only made the playoffs 4 times in 15 years and is a career .500 guy (86-84-1). Easy to see why he ain't there...

•nikkas saying Cunningham and Vick and McNabb and McNair and other black QBs are way off with their football IQ. Moon is the greatest black QB ever, in the Top 15 range, these other guys weren't touching him until Russ...
 

Illeye buckmatic

I Don't Stunt I Regulate
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
31,144
Reputation
32,095
Daps
127,847
Reppin
A Buckeye State Of Mind
I can't really argue with the Top 10. The only person I'd really debate would be Otto Graham. Guy only played 10 seasons, maybe 25+ years ago that was enough to still make you still Top 10, but considering the number of guys who have had a profound impact at the position since the mid-90s, you have to bump Graham off...

So just to speak on a couple guys cats in here are saying should have made it:

•Moon is an All-Timer, but he ain't Top 10. Dude is a career .500 QB (102-101) with a losing playoff record (3-7). He was physically and cerebrally gifted at the position but too often he put up numbers with mediocre results. That ain't Top 10...

•Russ could possibly make his way to Top 10 status. He's only in Year 8, and with the longevity of the modern QB, he probably has a good decade left, the entire '20s. I do think he's probably done enough to already be considered a Top 30 All-Timer, and he only climbs from there, but he ain't sniffing Top 10 yet...

•Young, Kelly, and Rodgers are the top two guys you could argue should replace Graham. In the case of Young, you have to consider a few things:

He only won one of his rings as The Guy. You take away his '94 Super Bowl run, he has a losing playoff record. Also, 8 of his 15 years he played fewer than 12 games. Part of that was he had to back up Montana, the other part is he was injury prone relative to the other elite QBs we discuss. So with Young we are really evaluating the 7 years he played full schedule or close to it, you run into the Graham argument, in a sense...

Pound for pound, you can make the argument Young is the most accurate passer of all time, and he was athletic as hell. He won big games with few meltdowns, so the years he was truly elite, is why you can make the case he belongs. But I understand why he didn't make the cut...

•Warner was a great player at his best, but he's a guy who shouldn't even be in The Hall. In a 12-year career, he spent 6 years right in the middle of it as a part time backup to guys like Eli and Leinart, and in that 2002-2007 stretch, when he did start, he was 13-29. 13 and fukking 29. His last two years and that Bowl run in Arizona saved his reputation, he's one of the easier guys to see why he ain't up there. He's overrated...

•Fouts was arguably better than Warner, for sure a Top 5 guy at his peak, but only made the playoffs 4 times in 15 years and is a career .500 guy (86-84-1). Easy to see why he ain't there...

•nikkas saying Cunningham and Vick and McNabb and McNair and other black QBs are way off with their football IQ. Moon is the greatest black QB ever, in the Top 15 range, these other guys weren't touching him until Russ...
You can't replace the guy that went to 10 straight chip games winning 7 of them.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,485
Reputation
6,125
Daps
45,063
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
•I forgot Brees, he has a legit case. Gonna retire as the career yards, touchdown, and accuracy leader, but not Top 10? So I think this all boils down to where you see him in relation to Young, Rodgers, and Kelly. I wouldn't be mad at any of those guys in place of Graham...

The thing we all know with Brees is he missed the postseason alot for such an elite QB. Missed it too much. That's gonna hurt him compared to other guys, but his resume is stellar everywhere else...

•Rodgers probably would have been my choice, but it's close. Think about the guys in front of him, he's missing the total accolades of everybody except Dan The Man. And Dan was so supremely gifted, as I've mentioned before, he was Rodgers before Rodgers, he was arguably "the best passer of the football" (stupid ass phrase) first, arguably the most talented quarterback ever first. And he was so transcendent, you can't take Dan off the Top 10...

So as it relates to Rodgers, you have to consider where he is relative to the peers of his era and who he came behind. He ain't touching Brady or Manning. You can make a viable argument he's better than Favre and Brees, but all it is, is an argument---->because you can certainly argue Favre and Brees are better than him as well. Being his career isn't over, the burden of proof is on him to prove he belongs in the Top 10, and he just hasn't done enough to separate yet...

But he's really close, and if I was doing it, I (think) I woulda put him at #10. I think. But for sure he in the group that has solid arguments...

•Kelly is a Top 15 All-Timer who is habitually underrated. As good as any player if his era except Marino. The Super Bowl losses and the fact he only played 11 years hurts him badly, when you got Young who went 15, Brees is at 18, Rodgers is at 12 as a starter. So Kelky has less longevity than all those guys, but pound for pound he was as good as all of them...
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,485
Reputation
6,125
Daps
45,063
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
You can't replace the guy that went to 10 straight chip games winning 7 of them.

Why can't you? He played in a 10-12 team league with inferior competition. It's the same argument I make about Bill Russell---->he dominated his era, and in years past we gave him his due as one of the best ever based on that...

But the further we get away from his era, the more The Game introduces All-Timers who had to play in a league triple the size of the one he played in, with better athletes all over the field...

He'll always get his due as an All-Timer who dominated his era, but Top 10? It ain't 1989 anymore. Too many other All-Time quarterbacks have exceeded the level of play he hit, and most of those guys would have 7 rings too if they played in a 10-team NFL...
 

Illeye buckmatic

I Don't Stunt I Regulate
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
31,144
Reputation
32,095
Daps
127,847
Reppin
A Buckeye State Of Mind
Why can't you? He played in a 10-12 team league with inferior competition. It's the same argument I make about Bill Russell---->he dominated his era, and in years past we gave him his due as one of the best ever based on that...

But the further we get away from his era, the more The Game introduces All-Timers who had to play in a league triple the size of the one he played in, with better athletes all over the field...

He'll always get his due as an All-Timer who dominated his era, but Top 10? It ain't 1989 anymore. Too many other All-Time quarterbacks have exceeded the level of play he hit, and most of those guys would have 7 rings too if they played in a 10-team NFL...
So you're saying bill russell shouldn't be top ten either?
 

klientel

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,951
Reputation
1,710
Daps
75,850
The list is fine. Y’all nikkas complain about everything and would never be satisfied.

And Warren Moon isn’t going to make the list just off a couple standout seasons and losing just about every playoff game he appeared in. Stop it.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
67,957
Reputation
10,404
Daps
229,390
Both had ridiculous arm talent, both threw for a shytload of yards and tds, both had 15+ year careers with one team, both never won anything. I think it's a very apropos comparison regardless of LT.
“BOtH nEVeR wOn anYThInG”

such a simpleton comparison.

Rivers “arm talent” was never anywhere near Marinos. Not even close. Marinos arm talent is three times that of Rivers

Marino played 35 playoff gsmes without a single 100 yard rusher.

It took over two decades for another qb to touch 5000 yards in a season.

marino is the only qb still in the top 5 in passing not from the qb friendly era.

marino has never been as int happy as Rivers.

youre “tHeY bOTh wOn nOTHinG” is just a lazy comparison. Straight lazy
 
Top