This is what I'm saying. Its def not as simple as just economics, but economics played a part of it. @NYCRebel , @tremonthustler , if you were a landlord of one of these buildings, what would you do? And should "BK/BX newbies" be allowed to move into "your" boroughs at all?
Keep in mind, once upon a time these folks would have or DID live in places like Park Slope, LES, shyt maybe even TriBeCa or Dumbo.... and they got priced out of there by the likes of Robert DeNiro. So the idea that this is some culture theft conspiracy, and not just people looking for a place to live they can afford, is pretty much 95% bogus. Yea when these folks move in they change the neighborhood, but so did the first of us who came to these neighborhoods... you think Nostrand Ave was lined with jerk spots, liquor stores, barber shops and West African import/export centers in the 50s
We need to stop looking at this through an "us vs them" lens and look at it through a cause + effect lens. Just like I say in those "fukk black women" threads there's no value in breaking down something as complex as the black family dynamic or gentrification into something as dishonestly simple as "victim/oppressor"
There are def a lot of factors beyond our control in these neighborhoods, but I don't think folks are being honest/fair in qualifying the intentions of many of those behind the forces.
yep it's complex issue mainly centered around economics. people swear like these hipsters/gentrifers or whatever you want to call them are rich, maybe a small few come from wealthy families, but if they were they wouldn't be moving to these neighborhoods in the first place and most of them could pay the rent they do cause of roommates something it seems like alot of people in the hood don't want to do.
Last edited by a moderator: