Ineedmoney504
SOHH ICEY...WE EATIN
I bet u wouldnt be able to beat me in your beloved bsttlefield, u aint bout that action anywayI have a better username than you do
I bet u wouldnt be able to beat me in your beloved bsttlefield, u aint bout that action anywayI have a better username than you do
Halo>>>>>>> battlefield any way, fukk all thatLet me paint this picture for you. It's 2005. Timesplitters Future Perfect was just released. That was basically the most advanced shooter on consoles. Now imagine a game comes out a few months after that where you can drive tanks and fly helicopters and jets. You can play against 63 other people. You can squad up in teams of 6 for efficient communication and spawning. You can record your gameplay. Sophisticated anti-cheat detection. Ranking up gets you weapon unlocks (COD wasn't out yet). And of course it's all dedicated servers.
These are features which you still don't see today all in one game. These are features being advertised 8 years later as accomplishments in the next generation of consoles. Generic is a word only a fanboy would attach to a game like this.
Halo>>>>>>> battlefield any way, fukk all that
Halo>>>>>>> battlefield any way, fukk all that
clowns speakin on shyt they never played, faggits dikk riding shyt just cause its on they favorite console, and hating on shyt just cause its on a different console
Sounds like you haven't played Battlefield 2I played bad company and battlefield 3, I have them both, check my gamertag, I dont speak on shyt I dont know
I dont see where u goin wit this, finish wat u saying......I agree. But you do know the reason Halo was praised so much was because it was the first PC quality Fps to come to consoles.
I played bad company and battlefield 3, I have them both, check my gamertag, I dont speak on shyt I dont know
so battlefield 2, better than 3 and bad company 2, if so they trash developer for regressingSounds like you haven't played Battlefield 2
Maybe but that's not what I was saying. I'm saying Battlefield 2 was a great PC exclusive. Console gamers said they didn't care. They didn't care UNTIL they played Battlefield Bad Company 2. Then they cared. Console gamers didn't care about System Shock but all of a sudden they care about Bioshock. They don't care about Indigo Prophecy but they care about Heavy Rain or Diablo 3 until it was released on consoles or Bioware games until KOTOR and Mass Effect or Bethesda games until Oblivion or X-COM until Enemy Unknown or dedicated servers until Xbox One or downloadable games until 360.so battlefield 2, better than 3 and bad company 2, if so they trash developer for regressing
tech doesn't work this way
I think when people say that console gamers don't like PC exclusives they are talking about games like WOW, DOTA, and other nerd classics
Nobody ever said dedicated servers wasnt needed, atleast anybody wit online gaming knowledge, but I get your point, but I still stand by my point if it wasnt for bad company destruction it wouldnt have popped, and battle field 3 turned alot of people off when it didnt have as much destructionMaybe but that's not what I was saying. I'm saying Battlefield 2 was a great PC exclusive. Console gamers said they didn't care. They didn't care UNTIL they played Battlefield Bad Company 2. Then they cared. Console gamers didn't care about System Shock but all of a sudden they care about Bioshock. They don't care about Indigo Prophecy but they care about Heavy Rain or Diablo 3 until it was released on consoles or Bioware games until KOTOR and Mass Effect or Bethesda games until Oblivion or X-COM until Enemy Unknown or dedicated servers until Xbox One or downloadable games until 360.
It's called confirmation bias - people tend to believe things that favor their currently existing beliefs or choices. "PC games are for nerds" is a good way of convincing yourself that your decision to only play console games is a good one. "Online gaming" used to be for nerds at one point too.