Ineedmoney504
SOHH ICEY...WE EATIN
Halo is more competitive than battlefield, and it takes more skill to be good at it than battlefield, that why no fps compares to halo imolol @ halo > battlefield
Halo is more competitive than battlefield, and it takes more skill to be good at it than battlefield, that why no fps compares to halo imolol @ halo > battlefield
Halo is more competitive than battlefield, and it takes more skill to be good at it than battlefield, that why no fps compares to halo imo
It does, battlefield isnt a hard game at all, its no different than any other fps on the market, it doesnt take much skill to kill people
I can respect that you don't care about the stuff I mentioned. I just took issue with the quote below because people say shyt like that until they're playing a similar game on consoles. It's like a 360 stan saying nobody wants to play any PS3 exclusives or vice versa. Like I hate how MS stans didn't care about Insomniac as a developer but now they do all of a sudden. Switching beliefs to justify their own purchases.Nobody ever said dedicated servers wasnt needed, atleast anybody wit online gaming knowledge, but I get your point, but I still stand by my point if it wasnt for bad company destruction it wouldnt have popped, and battle field 3 turned alot of people off when it didnt have as much destruction
I dont think anybody shyt on developers and say they wouldnt play they games, but me personally dont care about 99% of the stuff u named, outside of mass effect, battlefield and heavy rain, everything else is trash to me
Consoles gamers dont want any pc exclusives anyway, shyt be trash breh