Steel
Superstar
Nothing she said is true, what she says is actually completely backwards Up until the first half of the 20th century, societies were organized in such a way, that woman could not provide for themselves. That meant that if you weren't married as a woman after a certain age, you would end up on poverty or become a burden to your relatives who had to provide for you. That's also why in some societies there were rules such as if a man dies and his brother is not married, he has to marry his brothers widdow.
In ancient societies, no matter if monogamous or polygamous, marriage was designed to secure woman by giving them a legal status which they didn't have by themselves. Polygamy was a solution to the problem that often times, there were far less men than woman around, because men went to war and died.
Pretend hypergamy doesnt exist brehs.
Marriage/monogamy is beneficial to both men and woman in the fact they can ensure the individual WILL find a partner and a woman can be provided for. But take that away and you have the Mongols. The upper class men have a whole stable of women/wives while the lower class had to resort to kidnapping and rape .
Woman will always choose the man with the most resources regardless. Look at China and India the competition is fierce over there because they have less woman. The rich brehs always pick first and the scraps go to the poorer men.