“Monogamy is for broke men”

If you were super rich would you be with one woman until the end of time?

  • Yes I would

  • GMB never lost


Results are only viewable after voting.

360dagod

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
25,159
Reputation
4,050
Daps
65,285
Reppin
SAN ANTONIO SPURS NY DIVISION
Do the women know about each other though :sas2:

When I be honest, it's like your insulting their intelligence in a weird way..

I don't have the tolerance/patience anymore..

When they think your a scumbag, your life goes much easier because the expectations are shytty in the 1st place...

Meanwhile, the "upstanding" man getting all kinds of tariffs and taxes placed...

Square gang going back to windows 95 with the dial-up connection
 

UberEatsDriver

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
44,110
Reputation
3,079
Daps
99,196
Reppin
Brooklyn keeps on taking it.
Simply surviving isn't the crux of why a man may be able to command a polygamous situation, and living where you live, I'm not sure why 50K is the magic number.

What powerful men? Most of those men are sons of previous powerful men who did not spend the rest of their lives sleeping with one woman and were "monogamous" by legal definition.

Polygamy was never "rampant" in the first place because ratio of men with the resources/power to command it has always been low.
You missed the point for every single point.

1.) a woman today does not need to seek the richest man to guarantee her and her child’s survival.

2.) Powerful men are born each and everyday from regular people. This conflicts the ideology that “polygamy is needed to keep the world moving”…no it does not.

3.) We are talking about wealthy men. Yes it was rampant amongst wealthy/resourceful men which is why monogamy was created.

Bonus point.

Being polygamous was also a way for a man to be a cuck. Many women in these relationships had babies on the side and would immediately assign the baby to the man at the top of the polygamous relationship.

Yea sorry I’m not raising no kids that is not biologically mine.
 

UberEatsDriver

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
44,110
Reputation
3,079
Daps
99,196
Reppin
Brooklyn keeps on taking it.
That article is thorough as hell and nikka is refuting it.

Literally history shows you that men with more resources barely practice monogamy.

Science has proven pretty much the same thing as well

This is one of those "hit dogs will holler" situation.
Monogamous men being call broke.
But in reality it's just telling you that whatever you think is normal in life has probably been programmed into you by the society you live in.
So really get to know yourself and think outside the box.

Also, aim for success before trying to get women.
What you want for yourself might be different, once you're in a different space financially
The only people who celebrate polygamy ironically are

A.) women who can’t find a man
B.) women who are proud to be side chicks
C.) Men who have promiscuous issues
D.) Men who like to control.

Notice it is hard to find exceptional people who value themselves and their partner in any of these convos.

It’s always the same people with the same personalities defending polygamy
 

UberEatsDriver

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
44,110
Reputation
3,079
Daps
99,196
Reppin
Brooklyn keeps on taking it.
Oh and btw there are plenty of successful monogamous relationships (some widely known). Monogamy is not just for broke boys. I’m solid with money and could never imagine myself taking care of more than 1 woman. No way!

But for y’all who don’t mind taking care of 4-5 woman. Do you and enjoy your life.
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
11,646
Reputation
1,476
Daps
24,493
Reppin
The Ghetto of Oz
Or ugly men with 0 stroke skills

Although I was never rich I was beatiful in my earlier years and blessed.

I also knew some guys that became male strippers that I went to highschool with and they got plenty of women without being rich

Polygamy is different cause you're talking full relationships but I imagine all the issues you'd go through with your current main will just be Multiplied with more partners. Nothing wrong with monogamy or polygamy to each their own

But I agree with the premise that if all else fails money never will

You can absolutely buy *love in 2023 and maybe with enough money you can buy some loyalty too

Goodluck
 

DripSzn

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
961
Reputation
-470
Daps
3,616
Reppin
New York
Oh and btw there are plenty of successful monogamous relationships (some widely known). Monogamy is not just for broke boys. I’m solid with money and could never imagine myself taking care of more than 1 woman. No way!

But for y’all who don’t mind taking care of 4-5 woman. Do you and enjoy your life.
You talking facts rn. People over here seem to think polygamy consists of threesomes every night.

Traditional polygamy had the wives living in separate houses while the man provides for them.

Besides that, monogamy has been proven to be the best environment for a child, and that trumps anything else.
 

UberEatsDriver

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
44,110
Reputation
3,079
Daps
99,196
Reppin
Brooklyn keeps on taking it.
You talking facts rn. People over here seem to think polygamy consists of threesomes every night.

Traditional polygamy had the wives living in separate houses while the man provides for them.

Besides that, monogamy has been proven to be the best environment for a child, and that trumps anything else.
A lot of people don’t know what they are talking about. It’s the same as women wanting a traditional man but would never return to being a traditional woman.

There are pros and cons in everything.

One thing about rich men is how naive they are to believe that just because they have money everything will work out.

A lot of rich men walking around probably don’t even know that their own child might not be there’s but because they have money they think it’s impossible for a woman to f*ck an average Joe while being together
 

Shadow King

Quiet N***a Loud Choppa
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
41,325
Reputation
3,068
Daps
84,237
Reppin
Hometown of Cherokee at Law
You missed the point for every single point.

1.) a woman today does not need to seek the richest man to guarantee her and her child’s survival.

2.) Powerful men are born each and everyday from regular people. This conflicts the ideology that “polygamy is needed to keep the world moving”…no it does not.

3.) We are talking about wealthy men. Yes it was rampant amongst wealthy/resourceful men which is why monogamy was created.

Bonus point.

Being polygamous was also a way for a man to be a cuck. Many women in these relationships had babies on the side and would immediately assign the baby to the man at the top of the polygamous relationship.

Yea sorry I’m not raising no kids that is not biologically mine.
I did not miss any points, I hate that y'all love to do this when someone presents pushback.

1. We know that. Again, bringing up the bare minimum of "survival" does not speak to a man's ability to command a polygamous situation.

2. Again, I asked, what powerful men? And powerful relative to who? Yeah, you can find some who are born to common folk, but you will find many more who just next in line to assume or heighten their father's/family's power. And regardless of their situation at birth when these men become adults who acquire power, what do they do in their personal lives? They practice polygamy because they can and want to

3. You cannot use "we are talking about wealthy men" after bringing up an average salary with good benefits to start the debate. Wealthy men do not run rampant in the human population, therefore the practice of polygamy does not run rampant in society and never did.

Bonus point: The same applies to monogamous men.

Between saying "polygamy is needed to keep the world moving”, which I don't know where that came from, and your last sentence talking about raising someone else's kid, you seem to be operating on fear of a particular scenario.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,559
Reputation
8,089
Daps
121,272
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
And how are those societies/civilizations doing now?



False.......

51wxhWD7fNL._SL500_.jpg


As different thinkers, Engels among others, have already stressed, polygamy is the trait of no single people; it has been and continues to be practiced by the upper classes in all countries, perhaps not in different degrees, but in different forms. It was customary among the German aristocracy of the time of Tacitus, in Greece at the time of Agamemnon, throughout the whole of Asia and in Egypt among the family of the pharaohs and the dignitaries of the court. In all these countries, without damage to the existing morality, this luxury was open to anyone if he had the means, but monogamy was the rule at the level of the mass of the people, particularly in Africa. In so far as Africa is considered to be the land of polygamy, it is important to emphasize this fact. In sculptural and pictorial representations, the monogamy of the people is proved by the numerous couples depicted.

It seems that this was so in all Africa during the late Middle Ages, until the tenth century, which marks the extension of Islam to the native populations, through the Almoravidians. Polygamy tended in this way to become general, without ever ceasing to be a sign of social rank. Thus, it is not rare to see members of the lower classes who, seeking to deceive themselves about their own social rank, marry several wives.
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,950
Daps
25,304
It’s so simple you nikkaz and women make it so complicated

Men love your wife
Women honor your husband

Yall(men and women) saying all this extra stuff to get around the fact that y’all too weak and loose to do this.
 
Top