Mike and Mike debating if KAJ top 5

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,728
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Tim Duncan's Case as the Greatest of All Time | Bleacher Report

Tim Duncan's Case as the Greatest of All Time
By Chris Norris

Before people start threatening to eat my children, slash my tires or whatever the kids do these days for vandalistic fun, please understand the stipulations of this column.

I am not saying that Tim Duncan is the greatest player of all time. I am simply saying that if the Spurs are able to win a fifth title this year (or next) with Duncan as the heart and soul of that team, then this would be the legitimate case made for him as the best ever.

Please keep that thought with you as you read the arguments made in this column.

Duncan by the Numbers

He has scored 22,558 point in his career (26th all time), and he’s most likely going to finish his career in the top 15.

He has 12,533 career rebounds (18th all time) and should finish in the top 10 in that category.

Duncan is ninth all time in blocks with 2,469 and has a legitimate chance to crack the top five before he calls it quits.

He has shot over 50 percent from the field for his entire career.

He has averaged more assists per game for his career than turnovers, as a power forward.

He was selected to the All NBA team for 12 straight seasons (13 total), including eight straight seasons to the first team and ninth overall.
He is one of only 12 players in the history of the NBA with multiple MVP awards.

He has won three NBA Finals MVPs.

He has four NBA Championships.

Those are all indisputable facts, but if we only used facts and statistics to measure a player’s greatness, Karl Malone could be considered better than Michael Jordan, and Allen Iverson could be more important historically than Larry Bird.

Fortunately, statistics aren’t the only measuring stick of a player’s greatness, and in the case of Duncan, the numbers barely scratch the surface of his legacy.

His Dominance at His Position

A friend of mine pointed this out to me the other day, and I’m in total agreement of his point. Tim Duncan is, without a doubt, the greatest power forward of all time.

Anyone considered knowledgeable about basketball would agree with that statement, and most people would be hard-pressed to even make a case for another power forward. Duncan is the only player in NBA history with such a stranglehold on his position, and that positional dominance works strongly in his favor as the greatest of all time.

At center, the case could be made for Kareem, Russell, Wilt, Hakeem, Shaq and Shawn Bradley (just kidding). At small forward, Larry Legend is most people’s pick, but the case could be made for LeBron James (sorry, but it’s true), Elgin Baylor, Havlicek, Dr. J and even, Scottie Pippen, depending on where you fall in the argument about the Chicago Bulls’ dynasty.

The point guard discussion would have to include Magic, Oscar, Jerry West, Isiah Thomas and the projection of Chris Paul, with legitimate cases for each of them. And the shooting guard debate would start with MJ, would have Hondo sprinkled in (again) for old time’s sake and conclude with some young 25-year-old punk claiming that Kobe will take the crown some day.

While I have my opinions on who's the best at each position (C-Kareem, SF-Bird, SG-MJ, PG-Magic now and CP3 one day), I could formulate a legitimate debate for multiple players in each group.

However, the greatest power forward conversation of all time starts with Tim Duncan and ends with TIMMMMAY! Now, the case could be made this is partly because it’s been a historically weak position, but it’s also in large part due to the extended brilliance of Duncan.

In terms of playing both ends of the floor, no power forward did it better and because of the crater-sized gap between him and No. 2 (Barkley? Dirk?); that, at least, gets him to the table of the "Greatest of All Time Feast."

A Great Teammate

If you’re still not even a little convinced yet that Duncan belongs in the argument, Duncan as the ultimate teammate is the best case that can be made for him.

Duncan’s career has transitioned from the incredibly slow tempo the Spurs were famous for playing to start the 2000s to one of the highest scoring teams over the last few years. While Phil Jackson had to design an offense as a last-ditch effort to prevent Jordan from being such a ball hog, Duncan adapted to any style and any role his team needed.

If he needed to lead the offense and score 40 points, he did it. If he needed to control the paint on defense and get the fast break started, he did it. You never heard one word, one excuse or one complaint out of Duncan; he just did what he had to in order to help his team win.

Jordan punched Steve Kerr in the face. Duncan patted Steve Kerr on the back. Wilt started passing incessantly and avoiding foul outs because it was in the best interest of his legacy (and he was a self-absorbed moron).

Tim deferred to Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili because he knew it would help them win a title, and it did. The responsibility of a superstar is essentially two-fold: 1) you have to be able to carry a franchise; 2) you have to be able to make everyone around you better.

The ultimate goal of your best player is to make the team as competitive as possible, and both those tasks do just that. Duncan proved he could carry a franchise when he won back-to-back MVPs, and he’s also proved over the past 15 years that everyone loves playing with him, and everyone plays their best when he’s on the court.

You can’t say that about MJ or Wilt, and even Magic, demanding a coach to be fired doesn’t exactly scream good soldier. But Duncan only cared about winning and the success of his teammates, and aren’t those the two most important things for a superstar?

Tim Duncan from a Historical Perspective

OK, for my final point, we’re going to play the "Perfect World Game." The PWG is quite simple: you can adjust things in any manner you choose in order to make your point, and it’s just assumed that it’s possible.

For this version, we’re going to create the "Ultimate NBA" where we have 30 teams, all starting from scratch and able to pick any player from any era. The team will get the services of every player for the duration of their career, and the franchise will have no knowledge of who they will be playing against or what era they will be playing in.

In other words, you have to be prepared for EVERYTHING. That means you could be playing in a 1950s style one night and a modern-day version of the game the next.

Now that we’ve established MY ground rules in MY Perfect World Game, let’s talk about how the drafting process would go. Because seven-footers are so rare and so meaningful to the history of the NBA, I’d imagine many teams would be leaning in that direction right from the get-go.

Also, teams want model citizens because negative publicity off the court could lead to negative fan reaction, which in turn leads to lost revenue. The best type of player would be one that you NEVER heard about off the court in a negative light. He would be a, what’s the word I’m looking for...an adult.

Sure, everyone loves Jordan’s fiery competitiveness and his incredible will to win, but punching teammates in the face and gambling at practice for thousands on half-court shots isn’t the best atmosphere to create for a franchise unless you had the perfect coach in place.

Since we can’t guarantee with our new franchises who the coach will be, picking Jordan would be a bit more of a "gambling" risk. Wilt was notoriously selfish so he’s out. Bird and Magic both had shortened careers, Kobe had Colorado, Shaq had offseason cupcakes, rap albums and Kazaam and Oscar was too bitter.

That leaves us with Duncan, Abdul-Jabbar and Russell, but I have to eliminate Russell simply because he wasn’t big enough to handle modern players. Between Duncan and Kareem, ultimately, I think most teams would pick Duncan because of Kareem’s supposed moodiness, lack of defensive prowess and overall disconnect from his teammates.

It took an infectious like Magic to bring out Kareem’s minimal personality; Duncan WAS that personality, and in the end, that’s the difference.

Duncan has proven throughout his career that he can play in any system, with any type of teammates, do everything necessary to win and make everyone around him better. Plus, he’s proved that he can do it for 15-plus years and never do anything outside of basketball to jeopardize himself or the organization.

What other all time great can you say that about? (Letting you think) Exactly.

And that, along with the fact that he's one of the most talented basketball players to ever grace the earth, is why Tim Duncan could (and maybe should…maybe) be considered the greatest NBA player of all time.


I'm the biggest Duncan fan on here, but he's not the greatest of all-time, I do think he's the best player of this generation simply because he accomplished just as much as Shaq/Kobe, despite never having a teammate as good as either. He will get overlooked in the all-time rankings because of his personality, just like Kareem gets overlooked for best player ever, despite having a great case for it.

If this dude had a young Grant Hill or Tmac by his side during his prime the Spurs would have been unbeatable.
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,257
Reputation
2,202
Daps
22,158
Reppin
Los Angeles
:dafuk:


every year they won the title they were favored to win

Duncan has lost plenty of times with the number 1 seed. If you have the number 1 seed in the conference, your supposed to get to the Finals...no excuses. That's why his 4-0 in the Finals is a great feat but overrated. Duncan and the Spurs weren't good enough to get the Finals and lose those other years.

Kareem & Magic's 5-4 record in the Finals and Kobe's 5-2 record in the Finals is much more impressive than Duncan's 4-0.
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,160
Reputation
985
Daps
44,238
Should of went to more finals and repeated at least once. Duncan and the Spurs seemed to play at their best when they are under the radar. Once the pressure and attention is on them they seem to fold. Probably why they never repeated.
:what:

In 1999 Duncan was out with a knee injury, 2004 they lost to a better Lakers team, in 06 they were one Manu call away from the finals and in 2008 they lost to a better Lakers team. Manu was also injured.
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,257
Reputation
2,202
Daps
22,158
Reppin
Los Angeles
I'm the biggest Duncan fan on here, but he's not the greatest of all-time, I do think he's the best player of this generation simply because he accomplished just as much as Shaq/Kobe, despite never having a teammate as good as either. He will get overlooked in the all-time rankings because of his personality, just like Kareem gets overlooked for best player ever, despite having a great case for it.

If this dude had a young Grant Hill or Tmac by his side during his prime the Spurs would have been unbeatable.

I can't put Duncan the best of his generation because he never repeated and the Spurs can only win when playing under the radar. They thrive off it. Plus he's lost too many times with the number 1 seed. Still it's close between Kobe Duncan and Shaq.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,728
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Duncan has lost plenty of times with the number 1 seed. If you have the number 1 seed in the conference, your supposed to get to the Finals...no excuses. That's why his 4-0 in the Finals is a great feat but overrated. Duncan and the Spurs weren't good enough to get the Finals and lose those other years.

Kareem & Magic's 5-4 record in the Finals and Kobe's 5-2 record in the Finals is much more impressive than Duncan's 4-0.


You're trying to penalize a guy for not making it to the finals more, when the other guys played with top 10 all-time players for the majority of their trips to the finals.

During his prime they were the number 1 seed 6 times, they won the title 3 times (the other time they were 2nd in the West).
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,728
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
I can't put Duncan the best of his generation because he never repeated and the Spurs can only win when playing under the radar. They thrive off it. Plus he's lost too many times with the number 1 seed. Still it's close between Kobe Duncan and Shaq.

They won 4 titles over an 8 year period, I don't care if they repeated or not, especially when their best chance to do it was in 2000, the year Duncan sat out the playoffs with a torn meniscus. That was when Robinson still had some left in the tank and could score 20+ in big games.

Kobe and Shaq had each other, two top 10 talents, Duncan had who exactly?
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,160
Reputation
985
Daps
44,238
I can't put Duncan the best of his generation because he never repeated and the Spurs can only win when playing under the radar. They thrive off it. Plus he's lost too many times with the number 1 seed. Still it's close between Kobe Duncan and Shaq.
:laff:

That's your reason for not putting Duncan over Kobe? :laff:
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,604
Reputation
3,260
Daps
52,924
Reppin
NULL
Should of went to more finals and repeated at least once. Duncan and the Spurs seemed to play at their best when they are under the radar. Once the pressure and attention is on them they seem to fold. Probably why they never repeated.

That's one of the more overplayed angles in recent sports history. Winning 4 titles in 8 years is winning 4 titles in 8 years. How can a perennial 55+ win team with championships be under the radar? :dwillhuh: The only year they lost where they should have won was in 06. Honestly if the Spurs got the same whistles that other champions (Lakers, Bulls, C's, Heat that same year) got they probably would have won that year. In 2000 Duncan got hurt. In 2004 Duncan was all alone out there. In 08 the Lakers gave it to them good an deep (ll).
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,257
Reputation
2,202
Daps
22,158
Reppin
Los Angeles
:what:

In 1999 Duncan was out with a knee injury, 2004 they lost to a better Lakers team, in 06 they were one Manu call away from the finals and in 2008 they lost to a better Lakers team. Manu was also injured.

Spurs got swept in 01. 08 the Spurs didn't have the number 1 seed.

Spurs had the 1 seed in 01 historically swept by the Lakers

Spurs lost in 04 BUT they didn't have the #1 seed. They still were up 2-0 and lost to a Laker team with no chemistry

Spurs lost in 06 to the Mavs and that was in the 2nd round not the WC Finals...who cares if they were one Manu call away from advancing, they still LOST.

Spurs lost in the last two years with the #1 seed...1st year to a 8th seed:russ: and next year they get sliding door swept(up 2-0) AGAIN.

Duncan has been sliding door swept twice:manny:
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,257
Reputation
2,202
Daps
22,158
Reppin
Los Angeles
You're trying to penalize a guy for not making it to the finals more, when the other guys played with top 10 all-time players for the majority of their trips to the finals.

During his prime they were the number 1 seed 6 times, they won the title 3 times (the other time they were 2nd in the West).

If you get the number 1 seed in your conference your are suppose to get to the Finals or it is a complete failure. I penalize Duncan for failing to make the Finals with the number 1 seed. I don't see why that is so hard to comprehend.
 

Lakers Offseason

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
6,375
Reputation
981
Daps
12,741
Reppin
NULL
Niccas naming players they didn't even see play:snoop:

Started watching hoops early 80s so I can't include Wilt, O, Russell, and KAJ in my list since I didn't see those dudes in their prime.

For the players I've seen, top 5 in this order:

Jordan
Magic
Shaq
Duncan
Bird

Criteria for me is which players gives their team the best chance to win a championship.

Jordan is GOAT to me. No other nicca carried his team like he did.

Magic is close second. More well rounded than Jordan offensively but didn't have the defensive prowess.

Shaq became a goofball after he left LA, but people forget how good that nicca was. The shyt that defenders were allowed to do to him in the post was ridiculous. Someone breathes on Bron now and they'll call a foul.

Duncan is best PF I've ever seen. Carried that Spurs team to 4 championships in an era where he had to play against Shaq/Kobe.

Bird is a non athletic version of Magic in the way he could facilitate on offense or score himself.

If someone puts Bean over Bird, I ain't gonna hate.

Two Lakers in the top 5:myman:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,149
Daps
279,728
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
If you get the number 1 seed in your conference your are suppose to get to the Finals or it is a complete failure. I penalize Duncan for failing to make the Finals with the number 1 seed. I don't see why that is so hard to comprehend.

The number 1 seed isn't always the best team in the league, or haven't the Cavs and Bulls proven that enough?

Again, they had the number 1 seed 6 times during his prime, they won the title 3 times. 4 titles in 8 years, that is a great run :shaq2:
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,160
Reputation
985
Daps
44,238
Spurs got swept in 01. 08 the Spurs didn't have the number 1 seed.

Spurs had the 1 seed in 01 historically swept by the Lakers

Spurs lost in 04 BUT they didn't have the #1 seed. They still were up 2-0 and lost to a Laker team with no chemistry

Spurs lost in 06 to the Mavs and that was in the 2nd round not the WC Finals...who cares if they were one Manu call away from advancing, they still LOST.

Spurs lost in the last two years with the #1 seed...1st year to a 8th seed:russ: and next year they get sliding door swept(up 2-0) AGAIN.

Duncan has been sliding swept twice:manny:
The Lakers were better in 2001. Much better. Lakers weren't the number 1 seed, because they didn't give a fukk the regular season.

The Lakers had chemistry when Malone was healthy and contributing.

A ring is a ring. Doesn't matter if you won them by repeating or not. You are making it seem like Duncan is some underachiever. He has FOUR RINGS.

If you want to say Kobe is better than Duncan. Say its because he was the better player. Not the retarded reasons you are giving.
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,257
Reputation
2,202
Daps
22,158
Reppin
Los Angeles
They won 4 titles over an 8 year period, I don't care if they repeated or not, especially when their best chance to do it was in 2000, the year Duncan sat out the playoffs with a torn meniscus. That was when Robinson still had some left in the tank and could score 20+ in big games.

Kobe and Shaq had each other, two top 10 talents, Duncan had who exactly?

Stop making excuses he never repeated. Kobe went to 3 straight finals and repeated AGAIN without Shaq.

Duncan had Manu and Parker. Lets not underrate them and overrate Pau now. Come on your better than that Wilt.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,589
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Kobe Bean Bryant is the 2nd best NBA player OF ALL TIME

Better than Kareem

Magic

Bird

Shaq

Russel

and ESPECIALLY Wilt Chamberlain

Only person he hasn't passed yet is MJ and we're working on that.
 
Top