Michael Johnson - "N1ggas run fast because we come from slaves"

[Isaiah Bradley]

About 6 months ago National Geographic did a front page article about the success of dog breeding for characteristics. It's the most uniquely bred mammal gene structure. You can make a dog short, tall, spotted, hairless, etc, with more success than with any other genome. So where ever you heard that dog breeding for certain characteristics doesn't work is a lie.

Unless you mean it doesn't work 100% of the time, which would lead me to believe you don't have a basic understanding of genetics. Because nothing about changing a genetic structure is 100%. You're still playing the odds.


http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/02/build-a-dog/ratliff-text

The human genome is much more complex. Genes hide through generational "mating cycles" and some don't. You carry traits of your greatest grandfather, whether they show or not. If people share dominant genes, it creates more dominant traits.

The science you just described that's conducted today, versus the "science" that was done 400 years ago are complete opposites and is what the discussion is about

Dudes are suggesting that genetic "chance" alone was enough to affect an entire race

 

[killacal]

So Hakeem, Serge and other African born players lost at their chance to be athletic cuz they missed slavery

 

[Marvel]

Its basically what Michael Johnson is saying

Has he wondered where the slaves came from?

Have we not marveled of the athletic exploits of people of West African decent for quite some time?

Were Christian Okoye and Hakeem Olajuwon not superior athletes?

He is stupid to stop at slavery just like anybody else to support that athletic ability was primarily fostered by slavery and not from the environment that God placed the original man, that makes him superior in athletic power, running, jumping, foot/hand eye coordination.

So if you are going to use the face, at least respond with something constructive.

 

[Higher Tech]

The science you just described that's conducted today, versus the "science" that was done 400 years ago are complete opposites and is what the discussion is about

Dudes are suggesting that genetic "chance" alone was enough to affect an entire race

How is it different? They've been breeding dogs to spec for more than 400 years, its all the same principle. It's all in the article. Lately it's become more profound and easier because of the development of genetic studies. But two short dogs makes a short dog.

What happened during slavery isnt going to affect every single slave descendant, but it affects a lot of us, in a lot of ways. There are at least 10 major advancements in genetic studies every year. If you notice, slave descendants are larger on average. Why would that be if it weren't for the practices during slavery?

African aren't as big as we are on average. Europeans aren't either. Except maybe for polish people, which is eastern euro, not British.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/25/us-healthy-waist-idUSTRE70O4H320110125

That's an article about African American women being larger than white American women. They can handle more weight before their heart risk, and cholesterol is affected. It's still in it's study stages, but a lot of evidence is there.

You can't deny what happened during slavery affects some of us today.

 

[Higher Tech]

Its basically what Michael Johnson is saying

Has he wondered where the slaves came from?

Have we not marveled of the athletic exploits of people of West African decent for quite some time?

Were Christian Okoye and Hakeem Olajuwon not superior athletes?

He is stupid to stop at slavery just like anybody else to support that athletic ability was primarily fostered by slavery and not from the environment that God placed the original man, that makes him superior in athletic power, running, jumping, foot/hand eye coordination.

So if you are going to use the face, at least respond with something constructive.

you obviously didn't read my posts. So...

 

[Marvel]

So Hakeem, Serge and other African born players lost at their chance to be athletic cuz they missed slavery

That is basically what these idiots are saying.

 

[Higher Tech]

Its basically what Michael Johnson is saying

Has he wondered where the slaves came from?

Have we not marveled of the athletic exploits of people of West African decent for quite some time?

Were Christian Okoye and Hakeem Olajuwon not superior athletes?

He is stupid to stop at slavery just like anybody else to support that athletic ability was primarily fostered by slavery and not from the environment that God placed the original man, that makes him superior in athletic power, running, jumping, foot/hand eye coordination.

So if you are going to use the face, at least respond with something constructive.

They didn't have to have competitions to see who the strongest slave was. You can tell which ones were the largest or strongest. Which ones didn't pass out after being in the hot ass sun all day. It was a business. and just like any business, you know who your strongest employees are.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

repost

 

[R=G]

Did someone actually say "Do your research" on a fukking comedian?

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

How is it different? They've been breeding dogs to spec for more than 400 years, its all the same principle. It's all in the article. Lately it's become more profound and easier because of the development of genetic studies. But two short dogs makes a short dog.

What happened during slavery isnt going to affect every single slave descendant, but it affects a lot of us, in a lot of ways. There are at least 10 major advancements in genetic studies every year. If you notice, slave descendants are larger on average. Why would that be if it weren't for the practices during slavery?

African aren't as big as we are on average. Europeans aren't either. Except maybe for polish people, which is eastern euro, not British.


That's an article about African American women being larger than white American women. They can handle more weight before their heart risk, and cholesterol is affected. It's still in it's study stages, but a lot of evidence is there.

You can't deny what happened during slavery affects some of us today.

so two humans make a human

MJ seeds are not MJ-isc.

 

[Higher Tech]

That is basically what these idiots are saying.

Just because one group of people gets strong, doesn't mean everybody else gets weak.

 

[Higher Tech]

so two humans make a human

MJ seeds are not MJ-isc.

That was in response to you saying dog breeding doesn't work.

The human genome is much more complex. Genes hide through generational "mating cycles" and some don't. You carry traits of your greatest grandfather, whether they show or not. If people share dominant genes, it creates more dominant traits.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

That was in response to you saying dog breeding doesn't work.

nobody ever said dog breeding does not work.

Like I said earlier

so the concept of genetics was common knowledge to folks of that era, that they chose to "scientifically" mate the most superior of genetics for labor. But yet a mofo like MJ could seed the most anti-MJ-isc sons?

nikkas back then had no plumbing swag in their house, with bathrooms outside, 30 feet from the barn, but yet they creating super humans because of their "knowledge" of genetics



This thread represents the realization that black folks continue to be their worst enemy. Too many lazy rational thinkers will continue to allow the brainwashing and complacency of a generation to manifest

Ol "how is a black girl a vampire? was her slave master a vamp?" azz nikka

 

[DalMem]

Did someone actually say "Do your research" on a fukking comedian?

I said do your research on the statement that Chris Rock said he regretted saying you dumbass.

 

[Marvel]

How is it different? They've been breeding dogs to spec for more than 400 years, its all the same principle. It's all in the article. Lately it's become more profound and easier because of the development of genetic studies. But two short dogs makes a short dog.

What happened during slavery isnt going to affect every single slave descendant, but it affects a lot of us, in a lot of ways. There are at least 10 major advancements in genetic studies every year. If you notice, slave descendants are larger on average. Why would that be if it weren't for the practices during slavery?

African aren't as big as we are on average. Europeans aren't either. Except maybe for polish people, which is eastern euro, not British.



That's an article about African American women being larger than white American women. They can handle more weight before their heart risk, and cholesterol is affected. It's still in it's study stages, but a lot of evidence is there.

You can't deny what happened during slavery affects some of us today.

I minored in Biology in college and studied upper division genetics. I'm sure I know more about it than you do.

What Africans are you comparing? East, South, or West?

The average Nigerian born here in the US is bigger than most black people.

Both my parents are from Nigeria. I'm 6'3" 235 lbs and I am among the smallest in my generation when compared to most of my cousins, some who even grew up in Nigeria. I grew up with Emeka Okafor, Frank Okam, Russell Okung, and Brian Orakpo. Are these dudes small? If you come to Houston where there are a lot of Nigerians, you will know they are not small people.