so you're using Michael Jordans sons as your be all end all argument?


.....and ignoring any and everything else?
Do you know Michael Jordans sons? Do you know their mothers genetic background? Maybe she doesnt come from good "stock". Do you know whether or not these nikkas put for any effort whatsoever into basketball? Do you understand the role genetics plays in aging, hair loss, bodybuilding etc? It's all GENETICS
But yet your just gonna throw all this out b/c you dont think MJ's sons are very good at basketball.

Like I said before, Genetics are not guaranteed results due to some consciously made efforts by humans. But because most folks, including many blacks, are not conscious of black history beyond slavery and the civil rights act, they feel comfortable with explaining things from a minimized/distorted view of black history

You obviously don't understand genetics and you don't understand horse studding. The methods and techniques used in horse breeding are more advanced than just looking at a fast horse, then expecting the offspring to be just as fast
You choose to ignore everything else, so that you could feel good about your simplistic argument, that has no perspective. How are the "stock" quality determined? when families were broken up and sold off. No kind of records followed each slave as they were sold off, that detailed their ancestry, but yet you claim that folks chose according to best "stock"?
You just proved my point clown azz nikka. If MJ physique alone was not able to make sons that were like him, so why are you asking me about his ex-wife genetics, when that knowledge was not known back then too, when the slave women were breed by physically "superior" slaves
If the size of a slave determined best stock in a male, then what determined best stock in a "female"?