During cross examination, Dunn was flustered and blurted out that "there were a car full of shooters with the intention of killing me"...the prosecution countered that the driver was calm and respectful by Dunn's own admission, and asked why Dunn was painting him as a "gangster" and a potential killer. Dunn had to admit that error in front of the jury.
is this killing a first degree murder case? i dont think it was plannedjury will be allowed to consider 2nd degree murder and attempted manslaughter by act in addition to first degree murder of jordan davis and attempted murder of the 3 other boys
by definitionis this killing a first degree murder case? i dont think it was planned
The need for deliberation and premeditation does not mean that the perpetrator must contemplate at length or plan far ahead of the murder. Time enough to form the conscious intent to kill and then act on it after enough time for a reasonable person to second guess the decision typically suffices.
by definition
If there's no gun in the SUV, and Dunn made a conscious decision to grab his gun from his glove department, load it and fire at Jordan Davis it was certainly a planned act and murder in the first degree
you mean to tell me that after all of your posts in this thread, this is your first time actually examining the evidence and reading the case summary
Even if Dunn is convicted ill never forget how the fukked up the Zim trial
Trial and error with virulent racist killers brehs
They intentionally botched the Zimmerman trial. They had so much to use against him. The domestic violence history, molestation accusation from a family member, his previous attack of a cop, etc.