Micah Parsons looking at Daks QB contract

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
22,576
Reputation
4,589
Daps
58,027
Reppin
Run Thru U Like Skattebo

threattonature

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,362
Reputation
3,940
Daps
78,287
I think its the wrong move, but some of these QBs are getting absurd contracts that are fukking it up for others. Unless you have a prime Rodgers and Brady, Mahomes, and even a Burrow, you shouldn't be giving a large chunk of your salary cap to one position. The guy you give the money to has be a guy that can carry a franchise and not who you hope can carry a franchise.
I've always thought the player's union should've fought for some kind of cap on QB salaries or some maximum percentage of the cap that the salary can count towards the cap. Try and free up cap room for other positions.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
103,941
Reputation
5,150
Daps
207,414
Reppin
NULL
I've always thought the player's union should've fought for some kind of cap on QB salaries or some maximum percentage of the cap that the salary can count towards the cap. Try and free up cap room for other positions.
Limiting how much a player can get paid is a bad idea
 

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
20,656
Reputation
7,399
Daps
113,004
Reppin
NULL
I've always thought the player's union should've fought for some kind of cap on QB salaries or some maximum percentage of the cap that the salary can count towards the cap. Try and free up cap room for other positions.

When I first heard the term "franchise tag" as a kid I assumed it meant it was reserved for the actual franchise player. It should be for a QB or whoever is the top player on the team and his salary shouldn't count against the cap as much.
 

FreshAIG

Moderator
Staff member
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
70,456
Reputation
15,823
Daps
310,217
Reppin
Californ-i-a by way of BK
I brought this up in the Raiders thread but on a podcast I was listening to, the guy broke down that unless you have like a top 5 QB, the way to win is have a QB on a rookie deal/low contract and just sign great players around them. I think it's like 85% of the last 20 Super Bowl QB was either on rookie or team friendly deals.

Guys like Dak, Carr, Cousins, Goff, etc...making 40 Million is dumb because they're never gonna be Mahomes or Burrow, no matter what. So spending that much on a QB that isn't elite is foolish
 

jay83

Superstar
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
6,590
Reputation
1,705
Daps
45,502
I brought this up in the Raiders thread but on a podcast I was listening to, the guy broke down that unless you have like a top 5 QB, the way to win is have a QB on a rookie deal/low contract and just sign great players around them. I think it's like 85% of the last 20 Super Bowl QB was either on rookie or team friendly deals.

Guys like Dak, Carr, Cousins, Goff, etc...making 40 Million is dumb because they're never gonna be Mahomes or Burrow, no matter what. So spending that much on a QB that isn't elite is foolish


Or every 4 years draft a 1st round QB and just surround the dude with talent.
 

Heretic

GOLDGANG...
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
24,238
Reputation
6,992
Daps
69,325
Reppin
Alabama
He wasn't huffing and puffing after Tampa and San Fran. And he gave trent williams one of his worst pff grades of the year. As long as he show up like that in big games he can say what he want

I don't know breh, Parsons looked like he couldn't do shyt against Trent. Don't know what the pff number says but the eye test said he was a brick wall.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,020
Reputation
6,412
Daps
170,500
I've always thought the player's union should've fought for some kind of cap on QB salaries or some maximum percentage of the cap that the salary can count towards the cap. Try and free up cap room for other positions.
I wouldn't cap their salaries, but they should definitely exempt some of their salary.
 

threattonature

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,362
Reputation
3,940
Daps
78,287
Limiting how much a player can get paid is a bad idea
I'm not saying limit the salary. I'm saying limit how much of the salary actually counts against the cap. So for instance a QB could still get paid $50 million a year but only say they can take up a max of 15% of the cap. So only 35 or 40 of it would count towards the actual cap space. It would still let QBs get paid and teams would've have to compete against each other for how much they pay QBs but it would open up more money for other players on the team.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
44,910
Reputation
5,865
Daps
138,983
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
I brought this up in the Raiders thread but on a podcast I was listening to, the guy broke down that unless you have like a top 5 QB, the way to win is have a QB on a rookie deal/low contract and just sign great players around them. I think it's like 85% of the last 20 Super Bowl QB was either on rookie or team friendly deals.

Guys like Dak, Carr, Cousins, Goff, etc...making 40 Million is dumb because they're never gonna be Mahomes or Burrow, no matter what. So spending that much on a QB that isn't elite is foolish
Honestly, I'm even hesitant to put Burrow in that list as we've yet to see him do it with elite offensive talent around him in the way that Mahomes has had to this year.
 
Top