`we're really gonna act like native 720p vs native 1080p isn't a major difference? just a generation ago the PS3 got shytted on when its multiplatform games didn't measure up. suddenly it gets downplayed in this console generation when the sides switch?Squinting at pictures to find small differences
at this point the only games i'll buy on my Xbox one are exclusives. anything else is PS4 or PC. Microsoft fukked up so bad. Tomb Raider outsold them on the PS4 and no doubt this will too. they now have a perception of being the inferior console that cost more which people attribute the price to an attachment most don't want.Glad we don't have to deal with no forced parity this gen.
Thief and the Witcher are next
Might as well sell your xb1 after you are done with Titanfall brehs.
And this is the game M$ opened E3 with
even you can admit this is a trend. major developers and major publishers putting out games on both and there's a noticeable gap in performance.
it aint hard to get a racing game @ 1080p/60fps. especially when the crowd looks like this
Metal Gear 1 and 2 on NES wasn't even the official versions of the game....and u silly even THINKING of comparing any Splinter Cell to the first Metal Gear Solid..first off..the first Splinter Cell came a whole gen after Metal Gear Solid.second..gameplay wise Splinter cell was great..but the universe was FAR less interesting and that's not even up for debate..Chaos Theory was the best Splinter Cell game...Blacklist has been the best one in years..but Metal Gear Solid was literally revolutionary when it dropped...did u nikkas even enjoy playing video games or did u spend all ur time hating on games on consoles u didn't like..Clownshoes, Been a gamer for over 30yrs. I had Rob the robot, i beat Metal gear on nes.
GTA is identical to the top down versions but with LESS replay value
And splinter cell 2 & 3 shyt all over MGS. After MGS2, series been irrelavent, hyped up by nerds who thought MGS4 and 4hrs of gameplay is somehow acceptable
Yea if I was getting my ass whooped, I would keep talking about last gen toIt's not. Looking at those pictures in the OP, you clearly have to zoom in and squint certain isolated points to see any differences, if no one pointed out the resolutions, no one would care about them.
All last gen I never knew or cared about the resolution of games, and I still don't. The game of the year last year that sony stans love so much had horrible specs, but none of that matterd cause it was a good game.
When people would talk about the differences in the games last gen it would be because the ps3 version ran like crap(skyrim, Bayonetta) not small barely noticeable differences. Show me an Xbox game that just doesn't work right, then I will start to care. Untill then it's all fanboy fluff
The current fervor to seek out these small differences comes from 8+ years of Sony Stan buthurt. So if we are going with the "inferior" hardware line now. Are y'all willing to admit that the ps3 was "inferior" hardware or will you still run with the excuses y'all been making for 8 years?
