Marlon Wayans baby mother wants 20k a month instead of the 18k she getting now

[jadillac]

the wayans brothers still comes on every day and it’s on HBO max. Plus their movies are getting royalties I’m sure

Doesn't matter like you think.

I heard Marlon himself say he got a royalty check once and it was for $. 03 cents.

But like another poster said maybe he has investments and such, because royalties don't pay like that unless you are Seinfeld or Friends type level

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Chicks in here wanna clown Marlon’s age and that’s fine… but if Leo DiCaprio cuffed her, a lot of sistas would be kee-keeing and celebrating at brunches…. They don’t even broach the fact that this lady was happily letting the nikka fukk wantonly

 

[Gloxina]

These celebs really be thinking these young hoes love them for them.

Men don’t want to listen. lol


I DEFINITELY am not an advocate for purposely getting pregnant out of wedlock, but if you’re sleeping with a man pulling in 200k/month….

I DEFINITELY understand

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

These celebs really be thinking these young hoes love them for them.

If you didn’t come up with the chick… or shared y’all youth together… what broad loves you for you? And who says he was looking for love from the broad?

 

[Shadow King]

No, custody shouldn't necessarily be awarded to the higher earning parent regardless because in most cases the higher earning parent doesn't have the time and flexibility to raise the child as well as the lower earning parent. And what a child needs and wants isn't a uniform standard, it's relative.

Yes, it should, because apparently the "standard of living" is most important. That high earning parent can hire a nanny or bring Nana in, which happens often anyway, even in two parent households in which one of them is an entertainer.

There's no relativity for a 1 year old child whose mother is making 200K tax free to sit at home with it. There are no wants and needs exceeding what's already being provided.

If so, highlight them, and good luck doing so.

 

[Gloxina]

Chicks in here wanna cloud Marlon’s age and that’s fine… but if Leo DiCaprio cuffed her, a lot of sistas would be kee-keeing and celebrating at brunches

We aren’t tripping off his age, per sè. This isn’t a DeNiro situation.

We’re tripping off a 51YO not understanding the game. If you’re sleeping with a woman in her 30s of COURSE she’s going to get pregnant and keep the kid for a check. TF?
And of course it’s messed up, but it’s also messed up to be having unprotected sex at your big age and not think about the possibilities.

The way Leo moves, if he knocks up one of his young chicks you allllllready know he had her sign a contract before he even knocked her up.

The point is if you’re an older man, especially one who is still in the age range to easily have access to women who can have kids, you need to move smarter.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

We’re tripping off a 51YO not understanding the game.

Don’t disagree. As I said earlier in this thread, he has been living half a century and should know better, and that he did this to himself

 

[lib123]

Yes, it should, because apparently the "standard of living" is most important. That high earning parent can hire a nanny or bring Nana in, which happens often anyway, even in two parent households in which one of them is an entertainer.

There's no relativity for a 1 year old child whose mother is making 200K tax free to sit at home with it. There are no wants and needs exceeding what's already being provided.

If so, highlight them, and good luck doing so.

Ok just so I understand, do you think she shouldn't be receiving the $18-20K that she's getting? Just to be clear, I thought you were arguing she should be getting much less since technically it costs much less to provide a child with the bare minimum as far as necessities. And yes lol, it is all relative as far as wants and needs beyond a certain point. For example, my parents considered it a necessity that I attend private schools my entire childhood since they attended private schools when they were children and the education they received helped them excel professionally. Technically private school isn't an objective "need" but to them it was. On the flip side, most of my upper class white friends had families who believed it was necessary that the mother stay at home full time to raise children while young because doing so had worked for them for generations. Again, relative and not objective.

 

[BrothaZay]

Goofy old nikka

 

[Ozymandeas]

$3k in groceries a month?

breh i'd be eating the finest cuts of steak

i'd go to whole foods and get three carts of groceries

 

[Shadow King]

Ok just so I understand, do you think she shouldn't be receiving the $18-20K that she's getting? Just to be clear, I thought you were arguing she should be getting much less since technically it costs much less to provide a child with the bare minimum as far as necessities. And yes lol, it is all relative as far as wants and needs beyond a certain point. For example, my parents considered it a necessity that I attend private schools my entire childhood since they attended private schools when they were children and the education they received helped them excel professionally. Technically private school isn't an objective "need" but to them it was. On the flip side, most of my upper class white friends had families who believed it was necessary that the mother stay at home full time to raise children while young because doing so had worked for them for generations. Again, relative and not objective.

No, I don't think she should. He's already been overpaying so that's prerogative, but her asking for 2K more after getting 18K is crossing a line and there's no indication that she's going to stop especially because:

This child is 1 years ago. You're bringing up private school that is years down the line. As stat s up thread, private school does not cost 20K a month, and on top of this, you are saying in your own words that private schooling was a need for the parents, not you.

Marlon's daughter will be attending private school whether her mother is getting 20K a month from Marlon or not. This woman is going to be staying at home because, again, this support is already 200K/year in untaxed money. So this lifestyle you're talking about is already accomplished and demonstrating that it's about the mother's wants and not the child.

Unless you can find a private school that this girl will attend in 4 years that'll eat up this monthly support, you need to show me something better than a private school example.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

breh i'd be eating the finest cuts of steak

i'd go to whole foods and get three carts of groceries

Show me a one year old that eats steak/lobster and lamb every day

 

[lib123]

No, I don't think she should. He's already been overpaying so that's prerogative, but her asking for 2K more after getting 18K is crossing a line and there's no indication that she's going to stop especially because:

This child is 1 years ago. You're bringing up private school that is years down the line. As stat s up thread, private school does not cost 20K a month, and on top of this, you are saying in your own words that private schooling was a need for the parents, not you.

Marlon's daughter will be attending private school whether her mother is getting 20K a month from Marlon or not. This woman is going to be staying at home because, again, this support is already 200K/year in untaxed money. So this lifestyle you're talking about is already accomplished and demonstrating that it's about the mother's wants and not the child.

Unless you can find a private school that this girl will attend in 4 years that'll eat up this monthly support, you need to show me something better than a private school example.

No, I mentioned my parents considering private school as a need for their children to demonstrate how what a child needs and wants aren't objective across the board. And thanks for clarifying, I misunderstood and thought you were saying she should be receiving much less than the $18K per month. But I still agree with the law seeking to maintain living standards across both households since it softens the blow of not being raised in the same household with both parents. Data shows across races and incomes that children being raised in the same household as both parents are usually better off long-term.

 

[Shadow King]

No, I mentioned my parents considering private school as a need for their children to demonstrate how what a child needs and wants aren't objective across the board. And thanks for clarifying, I misunderstood and thought you were saying she should be receiving much less than the $18K per month. But I still agree with the law seeking to maintain living standards across both households since it softens the blow of not being raised in the same household with both parents. Data shows across races and incomes that children being raised in the same household as both parents are usually better off long-term. Also, I agree with the laws because they're a deterrent for irresponsible behavior. If child support payments were more lax we'd see even more dudes having children all over the place.

You didn't address anything I said. At all lol. And you're still proving my point. Yes, your parents created a standard, not you.

I did say that she should be receiving less. How "much" less is dependent on what this child actually needs.

What's objective is that your private school standard doesn't yet apply to this child and it doesn't cost what she's asking for. And when it does apply she will be seeking much more than 20K.

Child support should be reflective of what it takes a raise a child. If it's about standard of living, the child goes with the breadwinning parent.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Child support would be reflective of what it takes a raise a child. If it's about standard of living, the child goes with the breadwinning parent.

Common sense is rare on this forum.. REP