Marc Lamont Hill terminated from CNN over anti Semitic comments

[Sccit]

Agenda - for WHAT? Who are the so-called Jews to care about that much to have an "agenda." Stop the fake news. I am just telling you the truth. With sources.

No - they haven't -- if they were fake debunked -- it was by so-called Jewish writers. No one else. And again -- I am listing JEWISH SCHOLARS and Historians.. -- and sources.

And - no I don't "hate the Jews" -- criticism -- and helping you learn the truth - is not HATE. It's educational. That game doesn't work. Sorry

Yeah -- post the Washington Post -- and David Mills - may he rest in peace --is a writer/journalist - not a historian. And did you read the article -- nothing is "debunked" -- what is stated is:

Why are so many people ignorant of such a well-documented point of history? One reason is that popular histories of New World slavery tend to omit any mention of Sephardic Jews while cataloging the activities of many other ethnic communities. In "The Rise and Fall of Black Slavery," C. Duncan Rice mentions the "Dutch refugees" who established the sugar industry in Barbados, and the "planters of Dutch Surinam" who, "with characteristic Flemish practicality," started up a sugar colony with a full force of black slaves. But he does not mention the Portuguese Jews among these Dutch. James A. Rawley's "The Transatlantic Slave Trade" has not a single mention over the course of 452 pages of the involvement of Sephardic Jews.

The holes in the popular record have led to misunderstanding. In a 1991 article in the Jewish monthly Midstream, headlined "An Old/New Libel: Jews in the Slave Trade," historian Saul Friedman noted that "Jews are remarkably absent from major texts" on New World slavery and cited seven history books by name. For Friedman, this constitutes proof that the role of Jews was negligible. Actually, he merely demonstrates the inadequacies of such "major texts."

It is necessary to consider this vacuum of common knowledge when analyzing how some blacks are trying to make political hay out of this complex history. If the popular record weren't incomplete -- that is, if everyone already knew that Sephardic merchants and planters had played a small but significant role in the New World slave trade -- there would be no "secret" relationship for Leonard Jeffries and Louis Farrakhan to exploit.

And it was both Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews - cause I myself have over 5% Ashkenazi DNA -- and my family are not down with IR - on either side.​

SORRY, IM NOT GUNA WASTE MY TIME DEBATING WIT SOME1 WHO IS SO FAR GONE THAT THEY ARGUE 26% OF SLAVEOWNERS WERE JEWISH .. ITS SO IDIOTIC THAT ALL U NEED TO DO TO DEBUNK THAT IS 1 MINUTE OF RESEARCH. UR CLEARLY POSTIN WIT AN AGENDA. IM GOOD SWEETHEART.

 

[xoxodede]

SORRY, IM NOT GUNA WASTE MY TIME DEBATING WIT SOME1 WHO IS SO FAR GONE THAT THEY ARGUE 26% OF SLAVEOWNERS WERE JEWISH .. ITS SO IDIOTIC THAT ALL U NEED TO DO TO DEBUNK THAT IS 1 MINUTE OF RESEARCH. UR CLEARLY POSTIN WIT AN AGENDA. IM GOOD SWEETHEART.

I thought you would say that. It's ok

Learn more about yourself and your people -- and learn to accept it. Then you won't be so emotional when truth is presented.

Take care

 

[Sccit]

Agenda - for WHAT? Who are the so-called Jews to care about that much to have an "agenda." Stop the fake news. I am just telling you the truth. With sources.

No - they haven't -- if they were fake debunked -- it was by so-called Jewish writers. No one else. And again -- I am listing JEWISH SCHOLARS and Historians.. -- and sources.

And - no I don't "hate the Jews" -- criticism -- and helping you learn the truth - is not HATE. It's educational. That game doesn't work. Sorry

Yeah -- post the Washington Post -- and David Mills - may he rest in peace --is a writer/journalist - not a historian. And did you read the article -- nothing is "debunked" -- what is stated is:

Why are so many people ignorant of such a well-documented point of history? One reason is that popular histories of New World slavery tend to omit any mention of Sephardic Jews while cataloging the activities of many other ethnic communities. In "The Rise and Fall of Black Slavery," C. Duncan Rice mentions the "Dutch refugees" who established the sugar industry in Barbados, and the "planters of Dutch Surinam" who, "with characteristic Flemish practicality," started up a sugar colony with a full force of black slaves. But he does not mention the Portuguese Jews among these Dutch. James A. Rawley's "The Transatlantic Slave Trade" has not a single mention over the course of 452 pages of the involvement of Sephardic Jews.

The holes in the popular record have led to misunderstanding. In a 1991 article in the Jewish monthly Midstream, headlined "An Old/New Libel: Jews in the Slave Trade," historian Saul Friedman noted that "Jews are remarkably absent from major texts" on New World slavery and cited seven history books by name. For Friedman, this constitutes proof that the role of Jews was negligible. Actually, he merely demonstrates the inadequacies of such "major texts."

It is necessary to consider this vacuum of common knowledge when analyzing how some blacks are trying to make political hay out of this complex history. If the popular record weren't incomplete -- that is, if everyone already knew that Sephardic merchants and planters had played a small but significant role in the New World slave trade -- there would be no "secret" relationship for Leonard Jeffries and Louis Farrakhan to exploit.

And it was both Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews - cause I myself have over 5% Ashkenazi DNA -- and my family are not down with IR - on either side.​

“SO CALLED JEWS” .. OH NO.

THE SIGNIFICANT ROLE WAS LENDING THE MONEY .. TO UNDERSTAND BETTER, REFER BACK TO MY STRIP CLUB ANALOGY. THE BANK ISNT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR AIDS IF U USED THEIR MONEY TO BUY A PROSTITUTE N CAUGHT THE VIRUS.

 

[Sccit]

I thought you would say that. It's ok

Learn more about yourself and your people -- and learn to accept it. Then you won't be so emotional when truth is presented.

Take care

THE TRUTH ALWAYS RISES TO THE SURFACE WHEN ITS ALL SAID N DONE.

STAY PASSIONATE, I LIKE IT.. JUST CHANNEL THAT PASSION PROPERLY.

 

[AlainLocke]

Nothing wrong with that. Their money bought the land and their people fought and died to secure it.​

They didn't buy Israel, they were put there by Western powers...and haven't lived there for thousands of years.

They are colonizers.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

This is bull.

Anti-Semitism - Anti-Semitism in medieval Europe​

 

[xoxodede]

“SO CALLED JEWS” .. OH NO.

THE SIGNIFICANT ROLE WAS LENDING THE MONEY .. TO UNDERSTAND BETTER, REFER BACK TO MY STRIP CLUB ANALOGY. THE BANK ISNT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR AIDS IF U USED THEIR MONEY TO BUY A PROSTITUTE N CAUGHT THE VIRUS.

I don't agree with your analogy.

But, you're right on them bankrolling the trade. Especially, during Dutch and Colonial era Slavery.

Alexandre Lindo was one of the largest factors on Jamaica, accounting for nearly 23 percent of the slaves sold there between 1779 and 1788. In colonial Rhode Island, Aaron Lopez and his father-inlaw, Jacob Rivera, were both wealthy merchants involved in the slave trade.

There was a heavy Jewish presence in Surinam from the earliest days. By 1791, the 1,300 Jews in settlements such as"Joode Savaanen(Jewish Meadow) constituted nearly a third of the colony's white inhabitants and were definitely involved in all aspects of the institution. In 1694, for example, 104 Jewish families, containing 570 individuals, owned forty estates and held 9,000 slaves (not the 80,000 claimed in Trze Secret Relationship, Friedman asserts). If existing records from 1707 are an accurate indicator, Jewish factors bought about a quarter of all the slaves sold in the colony by the Dutch West India Company.

Source:
americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/1998_50_01_02_reviews.pdf​

But, during the Antebellum era - they had their hand and pockets in every role.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

They didn't buy Israel, they were put there by Western powers...and haven't lived there for thousands of years.

They are colonizers.

Wrong on both counts. Jews have been in the Levant since at least the 12th Century BCE.

Also, there's the little matter of actual historical records.....

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia
​

In 1881 the Ottoman governmental administration (the Sublime Porte) decreed that foreign Jews could immigrate to and settle anywhere within the Ottoman Empire, except in Palestine and from 1882 until their defeat in 1918, the Ottomans continuously restricted Jewish immigration and land purchases in Palestine. In 1882, Jews were banned from their Four Holy Cities and in 1891, after briefly allowing some Jewish immigration three years earlier, the Turkish rulers tried to again close the empire to Russian Jews. In 1892, the Ottoman government decided to prohibit the sale of land in Palestine to Jews, even if they were Ottoman citizens. Nevertheless, during the late 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, many successful land purchases were made through organizations such as the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PJCA), Palestine Land Development Company and the Jewish National Fund.

It's like you guys don't know how to do a simple Google search to find out the information you have is factually incorrect.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

 

[Techniec]

No. It belonged to the Ottoman Empire until 1918, then was taken over by Great Britain. Jews AND Arabs both lived there that whole time. Then, in 1936, the Arabs revolted against GB and the Peel Commission was created to figure out what to do. The first thing they did was make-up a 2-state solution giving about 80% of the land to the Arabs and the remaining 20% to the Jews. Jews accepted the offer, but Arabs rejected the offer. They did it again in 1947 when the U.N. got involved. Same results.

So, like I said, this WHOLE thing is due to the Arabs/Muslims since the Israelis have tried several times to end this thing peacefully since 1936.​

use discredited 1970s talking points in 2018

 

[Techniec]

Not at all. They have a right to exist as they won TWO wars against coordinated attacks from multiple Arab/Muslim nations who've been salty about it ever since. They've even given land back that should have been theirs due to conquest and have tried several times to create another state, but it is the Arabs/Muslims who don't want a 2-state solution. They want Israel and all it's citizens destroyed. That is the ONLY solution they'll be satisfied with and they've been using very well-planned propaganda to get people to be on their side against Israel. Look at the responses in this thread and YOUR reaction to facts that anyone has access to.​

Because he said something that is factually/historically incorrect convinced it was fact and directed it towards the people who've been trying to settle it amicably since I was a little kid.

Palestine could have been a 'free' state 40 years ago. ALL those Palestinian 'refugees' were actually TOLD to leave by Arab/Muslim nations, not by Israel.​

Israel isn't the 'boogeyman'. Arab/Muslim nations are as they're the ones actually standing in the way of resolving this retardation.​

Even the propagandists who created and pushed this nonsense for decades dont believe this anymore

 

[MBwithadream]

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

use discredited 1970s talking points in 2018

Fail to refute a point and resort to mere assertions with smileys of people that use ghostwriters, brehs.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Even the propagandists who created and pushed this nonsense for decades dont believe this anymore

Continue to make assertions that refute nothing, brehs.

​

 

[Sccit]

I don't agree with your analogy.

But, you're right on them bankrolling the trade. Especially, during Dutch and Colonial era Slavery.

Alexandre Lindo was one of the largest factors on Jamaica, accounting for nearly 23 percent of the slaves sold there between 1779 and 1788. In colonial Rhode Island, Aaron Lopez and his father-inlaw, Jacob Rivera, were both wealthy merchants involved in the slave trade.

There was a heavy Jewish presence in Surinam from the earliest days. By 1791, the 1,300 Jews in settlements such as"Joode Savaanen(Jewish Meadow) constituted nearly a third of the colony's white inhabitants and were definitely involved in all aspects of the institution. In 1694, for example, 104 Jewish families, containing 570 individuals, owned forty estates and held 9,000 slaves (not the 80,000 claimed in Trze Secret Relationship, Friedman asserts). If existing records from 1707 are an accurate indicator, Jewish factors bought about a quarter of all the slaves sold in the colony by the Dutch West India Company.

Source:
americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/1998_50_01_02_reviews.pdf​

But, during the Antebellum era - they had their hand and pockets in every role.

JEWS BANKROLLED DAMN NEAR EVERYTHING BECAUSE JEWS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISTRIBUTING THE WEALTH. WHATEVER IS DONE WIT THAT MONEY DOESNT FALL ON THE JEWS, THATS OUT OF THEIR HANDS. YOU NEED TO DO MORE RESEARCH ON THIS FROM A NEUTRAL PERSPECTIVE. JEWS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SLAVE TRADE IS AN ANTI-SEMITIC TALKIN POINT THAT HAS LARGELY BEEN DEBUNKED. ITS SIMILAR TO WHEN WHITE SUPREMACISTS TRY TO BLAME SLAVERY ON BLACK FOLKS BY CLAIMING IT WAS INITIATED BY THE AFRICANS WHO SOLD THEIR PEOPLE INTO SLAVERY. THE MORE I DID RESEARCH ON THIS TOPIC, THE MORE I REALIZED HOW EXAGGERATED AND OVERSTATED THAT IDEOLOGY WAS. YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME- TRY LOOKING AT IT FROM THE OTHER SIDE AND YOULL SEE THAT A LOT OF WHAT YOU WERE LED TO BELIEVE HAS BEEN STRAIGHT BULLSHIIT.