Marc Lamont Hill terminated from CNN over anti Semitic comments

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,054
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,573
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
As an adult, Benjamin was a nonobservant Jew, who was not a member of a synagogue and took no part in communal affairs. He rarely spoke of his religion publicly.

HE ALSO BEGAN ADVOCATING TO FREE SLAVES AND ENDED UP BEING EXILED .. KEEP TRYING THO

I've read the Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews -- who cares is he was "nonobservant" - he was a Jew and viewed and treated as such.

Jews halt any conversation about their evil deeds. In addition, to trying to make Minister Farrakhan look like he is full of hate -- and he is NOT.

What they did to Dr. Tony Martin was disgusting. They are now doing the same to Marc Lamont Hill.





And nah. Judah Benjamin never did that -- and exiled from where? He went into "exile" cause he was a Confederate WAR Criminal - not cause he was trying to free Black people. Stop the lies.

He was a advocate and spokesman for slavery.

In early 1854, Senator Douglas introduced his Kansas–Nebraska Bill, calling for popular sovereignty to determine whether the Kansas and Nebraska territories should enter the Union as slave or free states. Depending on the outcome of such elections, slavery might spread to territories closed to it under the Missouri Compromise of 1820. In the debate over the bill, Benjamin defended this change as returning to "the traditions of the fathers", that the federal government not legislate on the subject of slavery. He said that the South merely wished to be left alone.

In May 1856, Benjamin joined the Democrats, stating they had the principles of the old-time Whig Party.[44] He indicated, in a letter to constituents, that as Northern Whigs had failed to vote to uphold the rights granted to Southern states in the Constitution, the Whigs, as a national party, were no more.[45]

Benjamin worked to deny Douglas the 1860 Democratic presidential nomination, feeling he had turned against the South. Douglas contended that although the Supreme Court, in Dred Scott v. Sandford, had stated Congress could not restrict slavery in the territories, the people of each territory could pass legislation to bar it. This position was anathema to the South.
I can go on... and list many sources - but you can get what you need from Wiki: Judah P. Benjamin - Wikipedia
 

Lucky_Lefty

Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,221
Reputation
5,869
Daps
118,270
Reppin
Purgatory
since the Israelis have tried several times to end this thing peacefully since 1936
giphy.gif
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,342
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,289
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
I've read the Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews -- who cares is he was "nonobservant" - he was a Jew and viewed and treated as such.

Jews halt any conversation about their evil deeds. In addition, to trying to make Minister Farrakhan look like he is full of hate -- and he is NOT.

What they did to Dr. Tony Martin was disgusting. They are now doing the same to Marc Lamont Hill.





And nah. Judah Benjamin never did that -- and exiled from where? He went into "exile" cause he was a Confederate WAR Criminal - not cause he was trying to free Black people. Stop the lies.

He was a advocate and spokesman for slavery.

In early 1854, Senator Douglas introduced his Kansas–Nebraska Bill, calling for popular sovereignty to determine whether the Kansas and Nebraska territories should enter the Union as slave or free states. Depending on the outcome of such elections, slavery might spread to territories closed to it under the Missouri Compromise of 1820. In the debate over the bill, Benjamin defended this change as returning to "the traditions of the fathers", that the federal government not legislate on the subject of slavery. He said that the South merely wished to be left alone.

In May 1856, Benjamin joined the Democrats, stating they had the principles of the old-time Whig Party.[44] He indicated, in a letter to constituents, that as Northern Whigs had failed to vote to uphold the rights granted to Southern states in the Constitution, the Whigs, as a national party, were no more.[45]

Benjamin worked to deny Douglas the 1860 Democratic presidential nomination, feeling he had turned against the South. Douglas contended that although the Supreme Court, in Dred Scott v. Sandford, had stated Congress could not restrict slavery in the territories, the people of each territory could pass legislation to bar it. This position was anathema to the South.
I can go on... and list many sources - but you can get what you need from Wiki: Judah P. Benjamin - Wikipedia



IF HE WAS AN OBSERVANT JEW AND PRACTICED HIS RELIGION, HE WOULDNT MOVE LIKE THAT, BECAUSE IT GOES AGAINST THE TEACHINGS OF THE TORAH

SO YES, IT DOES MATTER IF HE WAS AN OBSERVANT JEW WHO WAS AN ACTUAL PART OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY, BECAUSE THOSE ARE LEGIT JEWS.

he advocated freeing and arming the slaves late in the war

In 1867, Benjamin had been indicted in Richmond, along with Davis, Lee, and others, for waging war against the United States.

^FROM THE LINK U POSTED .. BASICALLY THE GUY WAS A GIANT DOUCHE WHO NEVER PARTOOK IN THE JEWISH COMMUMITY AND MADE ENEMIES WHEREVER HE WENT. NOT A REPRESENTATIVE OF ACTUAL JEWS.
 

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,054
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,573
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
IF HE WAS AN OBSERVANT JEW AND PRACTICED HIS RELIGION, HE WOULDNT MOVE LIKE THAT, BECAUSE IT GOES AGAINST THE TEACHINGS OF THE TORAH

SO YES, IT DOES MATTER IF HE WAS AN OBSERVANT JEW WHO WAS AN ACTUAL PART OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY, BECAUSE THOSE ARE LEGIT JEWS.

he advocated freeing and arming the slaves late in the war

In 1867, Benjamin had been indicted in Richmond, along with Davis, Lee, and others, for waging war against the United States.

^FROM THE LINK U POSTED .. BASICALLY THE GUY WAS A GIANT DOUCHE WHO NEVER PARTOOK IN THE JEWISH COMMUMITY AND MADE ENEMIES WHEREVER HE WENT. NOT A REPRESENTATIVE OF ACTUAL JEWS.

Type in all caps all you want -- doesn't change the truth.

It doesn't matter if one is "observant" or not -- as most of the so-called Jews are non-observant. Most "observant" so-called Jews follow the Talmud over the Torah.

And EXACTLY - In 1867, Benjamin had been indicted in Richmond, along with Davis, Lee, and others, for waging war against the United States. -- a Confederate WAR Criminal.

You are silly -- of course he did - he even found refuge in the homes of other so-called Jews during his exile. And YEAH -- he was.

One of the most misunderstood figures in American Jewish history is Judah P. Benjamin, whom some historians have called “the brains of the Confederacy,” even as others tried to blame him for the South’s defeat. Born in the West Indies in 1811 to observant Jewish parents, Benjamin was raised in Charleston, South Carolina. A brilliant child, at age 14 he attended Yale Law School, but was expelled soon afterwards for improper conduct. After Yale expelled him, he moved to New Orleans where he studied law and eventually passed the bar exam. A founder of the Illinois Central Railroad, a state legislator, and a planter who owned 140 slaves until he sold his plantation in 1850, Judah Benjamin was elected to the United States Senate from Louisiana in 1852. When the slave states seceded in 1861, Confederate President Jefferson Davis appointed Benjamin as Attorney-General, making him the first Jew to hold a Cabinet-level office in an American government and the only Confederate Cabinet member who did not own slaves. Benjamin later served as the Confederacy’s Secretary of War, and then Secretary of State.
And let's be clear -- he was an enslaver. He just wasn't one during the time of his role in the Confederate cabinet.

It’s hard to excise Judah Benjamin’s memory from the American Jewish consciousness, because it’s not in the American Jewish consciousness,” said Robert Rosen, who recounted Benjamin’s life in his book “The Jewish Confederates.”

Non-Jews didn’t make statues of him because he was a Jew, and Jews didn’t make statues of him because he was intermarried and not really associated with the Jewish community,” said Jonathan Sarna, professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University and the author of “Lincoln and the Jews.”

While it appears that the majority of Southern Jews owned slaves, of those most had only house slaves. (There were only four Jews in 1830 who owned more than fifty slaves.) Benjamin, however, owned a 300-acre plantation and 140 slaves to grow and harvest sugarcane on it. (One of his biographers has asserted that he was a “humane” slave owner.)


“Judah Benjamin is a great example of how Southern Jews were assimilated into Southern society,” Rosen said. “But of course they accepted all the values of that society, including slavery.”

“Benjamin had a kind of ambivalence towards the Jewish community, meaning he never denied being a Jew and never changed his name, but on the other hand his wife was not Jewish and his daughter was not Jewish,” Sarna said.

Many held Benjamin in low regard for another reason: A lot of historians now suspect that he was gay. This hypothesis, Sarna said, “explains a lot of things.”

It’s hard to excise Judah Benjamin’s memory from the American Jewish consciousness, because it’s not in the American Jewish consciousness,” said Robert Rosen, who recounted Benjamin’s life in the book “The Jewish Confederates.

Source: Why Is No One Tearing Down Statues Of Jewish Confederate Judah Benjamin?



51dmw7bBGOL._SX349_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

and from a commenter/historian:

Judah P Benjamin owned over 200 slaves and even farther from him being an outcast from the southern Jewish community and the exception, Jews flocked to the confederacy. The Jewish author this article cites even wrote a book bragging about the Jews in the confederacy. They were more likely to be slave owners than the average southerner. The major slave owners/traffickers were the Monsantos, Cohens and Levys. All of the original synagogues built along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts were built on the profits of the slave trade by Sephardic Jews who migrated to Latin America and the Caribbean as transAtlantic slave traders. FDR's major advisor was the Jewish Ben Baruch, who advised against accepting the ship of Jewish refugees was the son of a confederate and member of the kkk Simon Baruch. Ben Baruch wrote in his memoirs about the pride he felt when he found his father's klan regalia.​
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,342
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,289
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Type in all caps all you want -- doesn't change the truth.

It doesn't matter if one is "observant" or not -- as most of the so-called Jews are non-observant. Most "observant" so-called Jews follow the Talmud over the Torah.

And EXACTLY - In 1867, Benjamin had been indicted in Richmond, along with Davis, Lee, and others, for waging war against the United States. -- a Confederate WAR Criminal.

You are silly -- of course he did - he even found refuge in the homes of other so-called Jews during his exile. And YEAH -- he was.

One of the most misunderstood figures in American Jewish history is Judah P. Benjamin, whom some historians have called “the brains of the Confederacy,” even as others tried to blame him for the South’s defeat. Born in the West Indies in 1811 to observant Jewish parents, Benjamin was raised in Charleston, South Carolina. A brilliant child, at age 14 he attended Yale Law School, but was expelled soon afterwards for improper conduct. After Yale expelled him, he moved to New Orleans where he studied law and eventually passed the bar exam. A founder of the Illinois Central Railroad, a state legislator, and a planter who owned 140 slaves until he sold his plantation in 1850, Judah Benjamin was elected to the United States Senate from Louisiana in 1852. When the slave states seceded in 1861, Confederate President Jefferson Davis appointed Benjamin as Attorney-General, making him the first Jew to hold a Cabinet-level office in an American government and the only Confederate Cabinet member who did not own slaves. Benjamin later served as the Confederacy’s Secretary of War, and then Secretary of State.
And let's be clear -- he was an enslaver. He just wasn't one during the time of his role in the Confederate cabinet.

It’s hard to excise Judah Benjamin’s memory from the American Jewish consciousness, because it’s not in the American Jewish consciousness,” said Robert Rosen, who recounted Benjamin’s life in his book “The Jewish Confederates.”

Non-Jews didn’t make statues of him because he was a Jew, and Jews didn’t make statues of him because he was intermarried and not really associated with the Jewish community,” said Jonathan Sarna, professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University and the author of “Lincoln and the Jews.”

While it appears that the majority of Southern Jews owned slaves, of those most had only house slaves. (There were only four Jews in 1830 who owned more than fifty slaves.) Benjamin, however, owned a 300-acre plantation and 140 slaves to grow and harvest sugarcane on it. (One of his biographers has asserted that he was a “humane” slave owner.)


“Judah Benjamin is a great example of how Southern Jews were assimilated into Southern society,” Rosen said. “But of course they accepted all the values of that society, including slavery.”

“Benjamin had a kind of ambivalence towards the Jewish community, meaning he never denied being a Jew and never changed his name, but on the other hand his wife was not Jewish and his daughter was not Jewish,” Sarna said.

Many held Benjamin in low regard for another reason: A lot of historians now suspect that he was gay. This hypothesis, Sarna said, “explains a lot of things.”

It’s hard to excise Judah Benjamin’s memory from the American Jewish consciousness, because it’s not in the American Jewish consciousness,” said Robert Rosen, who recounted Benjamin’s life in the book “The Jewish Confederates.

Source: Why Is No One Tearing Down Statues Of Jewish Confederate Judah Benjamin?



51dmw7bBGOL._SX349_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


YOUVE OBVIOUSLY ALREADY BEEN BRAINWASHED BY A MAN WHO CONTROLS YOUR MIND, SO THERES NOT MUCH I CAN SAY TO CHANGE THAT

BUT HERE U GO

The Jewish Confederates is a 2001 history book authored by Robert N. Rosen about Jewish citizens of the Confederate States of America who served in the Confederate States Army (CSA) during the American Civil War of 1861–1865. As they made up just 0.2% of the CSA

0.2% LMFAO .... ITS REALLY EMBARASSING THAT ANY1 WOULD SIT THERE AND TRY TO USE SUCH A TINY OUTLIER AGAINST THE ENTIRE JEWISH COMMUNITY. DISGUSTING, REALLY.

ITS ALSO A LIE THAT MOST JEWS ARENT OBSERVANT OR AT THE VERY LEAST INVOLVED IN THE JEWISH COMMUNITY. U MUST HAVE NO CLUE WHATSOEVER HOW WE MOVE AS A UNIT. BUT I CANT TELL U HOW TO WIN, KEEP COOKIN THEM
BURNT MEALS HOMEGIRL.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,502
Reputation
4,976
Daps
113,711
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Jews are not gonna apologize, in fact they shut down any discussion of this by copping endless pleas or trying to sabotage careers of historians who even mention this . Or sicc their flunkies to atack those who dare speak about it.
They'd prefer to bury any mention of American jews owning slaves.As if it didn't happen,

t70Two33952.jpg


Judah Benjamin's face on Confederate Currency says different,though.

Ohh shiit :dwillhuh:
 

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,054
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,573
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
YOUVE OBVIOUSLY ALREADY BEEN BRAINWASHED BY A MAN WHO CONTROLS YOUR MIND, SO THERES NOT MUCH I CAN SAY TO CHANGE THAT

BUT HERE U GO

The Jewish Confederates is a 2001 history book authored by Robert N. Rosen about Jewish citizens of the Confederate States of America who served in the Confederate States Army (CSA) during the American Civil War of 1861–1865. As they made up just 0.2% of the CSA

0.2% LMFAO .... ITS REALLY EMBARASSING THAT ANY1 WOULD SIT THERE AND TRY TO USE SUCH A TINY OUTLIER AGAINST THE ENTIRE JEWISH COMMUNITY. DISGUSTING, REALLY.


Brainwashed? NO. I am well-read. It's DISGUSTING - that you act like owning THOUSANDS of enslaved people -- and helping to enslaved MILLIONS is "miniscule."

Your "minuscule" number is not accurate and it's from the 1830's.

From YOUR people:

http://americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/1961_13_01_00_doc_jewsConf.pdf
https://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=library_facpubs

And no one controls me - but myself.

And the so-called Jews -- were apart of every part of the slave trade. In addition, to their low-numbers of immigration - they had a presence in all facets of Colonial and Antebellum era slavery.

Enslavers
Shipping Ports
Brokerage - Slave Brokers
Commission Merchants

Of all the shipping ports in Colonial America, only in Newport, Rhode Island did Jewish merchants play a significant part in the slave-trade.[132]

A table of the commissions of brokers in Charleston, South Carolina, shows that one Jewish brokerage accounted for 4% of the commissions. According to Bertram Korn, Jews accounted for 4 of the 44 slave-brokers in Charleston, three of 70 in Richmond, and 1 of 12 in Memphis.[133] However the proportion of Jewish residents of Charleston who owned slaves was similar to that of the general white population (83% versus 87% in 1830).​

Jacob Rader Marcus, a historian and Reform rabbi, wrote in his four-volume history of Americans Jews that over 75 percent of Jewish families in Charleston, South Carolina; Richmond, Virginia; and Savannah, Georgia, owned slaves, and nearly 40 percent of Jewish households across the country did.

Davis went on to note that in the American South in 1830 there were “120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves.”
That does not account for the MANY Jewish enslavers who owned less than 20 slaves -- which most had 1-3 enslaved.

Jews in the south usually owned slaves as domestic servants or to work in their business. Jewish slave owners were found mostly in business or domestic settings, rather than on plantations, so most of the slave ownership was in an urban context — running a business or as domestic servants

And your 1.2% stats was from 1830 -- slavery ended in 1865. It's noted in 1860 -- it averaged around 1/3rd being slave owners. This means that there were about 120,000 families in the Southern States.

So, it breaks down as;
25-30% of Whites in the South owned slaves
And 25% of Jews.

Source: Selected Statistics

Plus, many acted like they converted--but really practiced Judaism in private. So, whose to say how many it really were.

Due to forcible conversions of Jews to Christianity many New Christians continued to practice Judaism in secret, meaning it is impossible for historians to
determine what portion of these slave traders were Jewish, because to do so would require the historian to choose one of several definitions of "Jewish"

And they were mostly PRO-Slavery:

Ken Yellis, writing in The Forward, has suggested that "the majority of American Jews were mute on the subject, perhaps because they dreaded its tremendous corrosive power. Prior to 1861, there are virtually no instances of rabbinical sermons on slavery, probably due to fear that the controversy would trigger a sectional conflict in which Jewish families would be arrayed on opposite sides. ... America’s largest Jewish community, New York’s Jews were overwhelmingly pro-southern, pro-slavery, and anti-Lincoln in the early years of the war." However, as the war progressed, "and the North’s military victories mounted, feelings began to shift toward


 
Last edited:

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,054
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,573
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
YOUVE OBVIOUSLY ALREADY BEEN BRAINWASHED BY A MAN WHO CONTROLS YOUR MIND, SO THERES NOT MUCH I CAN SAY TO CHANGE THAT

BUT HERE U GO

The Jewish Confederates is a 2001 history book authored by Robert N. Rosen about Jewish citizens of the Confederate States of America who served in the Confederate States Army (CSA) during the American Civil War of 1861–1865. As they made up just 0.2% of the CSA

0.2% LMFAO .... ITS REALLY EMBARASSING THAT ANY1 WOULD SIT THERE AND TRY TO USE SUCH A TINY OUTLIER AGAINST THE ENTIRE JEWISH COMMUNITY. DISGUSTING, REALLY.

ITS ALSO A LIE THAT MOST JEWS ARENT OBSERVANT OR AT THE VERY LEAST INVOLVED IN THE JEWISH COMMUNITY. U MUST HAVE NO CLUE WHATSOEVER HOW WE MOVE AS A UNIT. BUT I CANT TELL U HOW TO WIN, KEEP COOKIN THEM
BURNT MEALS HOMEGIRL.


For more info on your "minuscule" claim.

There were 200,000 jews in the US in 1860.

Jewish Population in the United States, Nationally

40% of 200,000 = 80,000

So 80,000 jews owned slaves.

393,975 - 80,000 = 313,975 non-jews owned slaves.

80,000 jew slave owners

313,975 non-jew slave owners

Thus, at a minimum, 26% of all slave owners were jews, despite being just a minuscule 0.7% of the population.


Feel free to learn more about your people here: Jews And Negro Slavery In The Old South - 1789-1865 : Bertram Wallace Korn : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Written by a rabbi and delivered as the presidential address at the fifty-ninth annual meeting of the American Jewish Historical Society, this small work, despite its expected philo-semitic slant, provides some information as to Jewish participation in the American slave economy.

and Jewish Slave Dealers and Owners
 
Last edited:

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,342
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,289
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Brainwashed? NO. I am well-read. It's DISGUSTING - that you act like owning THOUSANDS of enslaved people -- and helping to enslaved MILLIONS is "miniscule."

Your "minuscule" number is not accurate and it's from the 1830's.

From YOUR people:

http://americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/1961_13_01_00_doc_jewsConf.pdf
https://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=library_facpubs

And no one controls me - but myself.

And the so-called Jews -- were apart of every part of the slave trade. In addition, to their low-numbers of immigration - they had a presence in all facets of Colonial and Antebellum era slavery.

Enslavers
Shipping Ports
Brokerage

Of all the shipping ports in Colonial America, only in Newport, Rhode Island did Jewish merchants play a significant part in the slave-trade.[132]

A table of the commissions of brokers in Charleston, South Carolina, shows that one Jewish brokerage accounted for 4% of the commissions. According to Bertram Korn, Jews accounted for 4 of the 44 slave-brokers in Charleston, three of 70 in Richmond, and 1 of 12 in Memphis.[133] However the proportion of Jewish residents of Charleston who owned slaves was similar to that of the general white population (83% versus 87% in 1830).​

Jacob Rader Marcus, a historian and Reform rabbi, wrote in his four-volume history of Americans Jews that over 75 percent of Jewish families in Charleston, South Carolina; Richmond, Virginia; and Savannah, Georgia, owned slaves, and nearly 40 percent of Jewish households across the country did.

Davis went on to note that in the American South in 1830 there were “120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves.”
That does not account for the MANY Jewish enslavers who owned less than 20 slaves -- which most had 1-3 enslaved.

Jews in the south usually owned slaves as domestic servants or to work in their business. Jewish slave owners were found mostly in business or domestic settings, rather than on plantations, so most of the slave ownership was in an urban context — running a business or as domestic servants

And your 1.2% stats was from 1830 -- slavery ended in 1865. It's noted in 1860 -- it averaged around 1/3rd being slave owners. This means that there were about 120,000 families in the Southern States.

So, it breaks down as;
25-30% of Whites in the South owned slaves
And 25% of Jews.

Source: Selected Statistics

Plus, many acted like they converted--but really practiced Judaism in private. So, whose to say how many it really were.

Due to forcible conversions of Jews to Christianity many New Christians continued to practice Judaism in secret, meaning it is impossible for historians to
determine what portion of these slave traders were Jewish, because to do so would require the historian to choose one of several definitions of "Jewish"

And they were mostly PRO-Slavery:

Ken Yellis, writing in The Forward, has suggested that "the majority of American Jews were mute on the subject, perhaps because they dreaded its tremendous corrosive power. Prior to 1861, there are virtually no instances of rabbinical sermons on slavery, probably due to fear that the controversy would trigger a sectional conflict in which Jewish families would be arrayed on opposite sides. ... America’s largest Jewish community, New York’s Jews were overwhelmingly pro-southern, pro-slavery, and anti-Lincoln in the early years of the war." However, as the war progressed, "and the North’s military victories mounted, feelings began to shift toward




U HAVE AN AGENDA .. UR ADAMANT NATURE IS COMMENDABLE. BUT ITS PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT SOME1 PUT U UP TO THIS.

PAY ATTENTION

DURING SLAVERY, LESS THAN 1% OF JEWS WERE IN AMERICA .. OF THEM, MOST HAD TO HIDE THEIR JEWISH IDENTITY. WHAT IS MINISCULE IS THE NUMBER OF JEWS ACTUALLY INVOLVED .. DONT TRY N TWIST MY WORDS TO CREATE FAUX OUTRAGE, THATS A WEAK DEBATE TACTIC.

AS FAR AS JEWS INVOLVEMENT IN THE SLAVE TRADE, THEY WERE SIMPLY RESPONSIBLS FOR THE MONEY. IF THE BANK LENDS YOU MONEY AND U USE THAT MONEY TO GO TO THE MALE STRIP CLUB AND CATCH AIDS, THAT DOESNT MEAN THE BANK IS RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR AIDS.

I UNDERSTAND U BADLY WANT TO HATE JEWS, BUT MOST OF YOUR TALKING POINTS HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED LONG AGO. YOU CHOOSE TO READ ANTI-JEWISH WRITING AS OPPOSED TO LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH...

Some observers acknowledge that certain communities of Jews participated directly in black slavery -- but in far smaller numbers than non-Jews among the Portuguese, Dutch, English and French, than Arabs, or than Africans themselves. To focus on the role of Jews, they say, is gratuitous at best, antisemitic at worst. But to a few critics, even mentioning Jews and the slave trade is hateful and bigoted. Jews were not significantly involved, they claim -- contrary to the scholarly record, much of it compiled by historians who are Jewish.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...3741418/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d392aca48bfa



DO BETTER
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,342
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,289
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
For more info on your "minuscule" claim.

There were 200,000 jews in the US in 1860.

Jewish Population in the United States, Nationally

40% of 200,000 = 80,000

So 80,000 jews owned slaves.

393,975 - 80,000 = 313,975 non-jews owned slaves.

80,000 jew slave owners

313,975 non-jew slave owners

Thus, at a minimum, 26% of all slave owners were jews, despite being just a minuscule 0.7% of the population.


Feel free to learn more about your people here: Jews And Negro Slavery In The Old South - 1789-1865 : Bertram Wallace Korn : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Written by a rabbi and delivered as the presidential address at the fifty-ninth annual meeting of the American Jewish Historical Society, this small work, despite its expected philo-semitic slant, provides some information as to Jewish participation in the American slave economy.

and Jewish Slave Dealers and Owners


LMFAO THEM NUMBERS ARE SO FAKE AND FAR FETCHED THAT THIS ISNT EVEN WORTH RESPONDING TO

BUT ILL DO IT ANYWAY:

Jews accounted for 1.25% of all Southern slave owners.[14]

OF THAT 1.25%, A MAJORITY OF THEM WERE FORCED TO HIDE THEIR IDENTITY. UR LIVING A LIE.. WHAT MAN PUT U UP TO THIS DARLING? BET IT WAS SOME1 WHO MADE A BAD DEAL WIT A JEW AND STILL HOLDIN A GRUDGE...U SO FAR GONE ITS SAD THAT IM EVEN WASTING MY TIME HERE. “WELL READ” LOL
 

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,054
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,573
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
LMFAO THEM NUMBERS ARE SO FAKE AND FAR FETCHED THAT THIS ISNT EVEN WORTH RESPONDING TO

BUT ILL DO IT ANYWAY:

Jews accounted for 1.25% of all Southern slave owners, and were not significantly different from other slave owners in their treatment of slaves.[14]

OF THAT 1.25%, A MAJORITY OF THEM WERE FORCED TO HIDE THEIR IDENTITY. UR LIVING A LIE.. WHAT MAN PUT U UP TO THIS DARLING? BET IT WAS SOME1 WHO MADE A BAD DEAL WIT A JEW AND STILL HOLDIN A GRUDGE...U SO FAR GONE ITS SAD THAT IM EVEN WASTING MY TIME HERE. “WELL READ” LOL

You're lost. And no, I'm wasting my time -- with a deceitful, lying person like yourself.

I'm sorry, but your refusal to discuss and acknowledge truth about history -- is what is the core of this issue.

1.2% is from 1830 -- and again -- numbers grew years -- as 1860 - slavery and the slave trade were doing very well.

I reference facts -- and 99% of them are by so-called Jewish scholars, sources and historians. So, you should take that up with them.

Learn more Colonial and Southern History -- as many Jews fake converted to Christianity.
Natalie Zemon Davis on Jewish Slaveowners Celebrating Passover in 17th-Century Suriname

And read this:
Cotton, Capital, and Ethnic Networks: Jewish Economic Growth in the Postbellum Gulf South
http://americanjewisharchives.org/publications/journal/PDF/2012_64_01_00_cohen.pdf
 
Last edited:

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,054
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,573
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
U HAVE AN AGENDA .. UR ADAMANT NATURE IS COMMENDABLE. BUT ITS PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT SOME1 PUT U UP TO THIS.

PAY ATTENTION

DURING SLAVERY, LESS THAN 1% OF JEWS WERE IN AMERICA .. OF THEM, MOST HAD TO HIDE THEIR JEWISH IDENTITY. WHAT IS MINISCULE IS THE NUMBER OF JEWS ACTUALLY INVOLVED .. DONT TRY N TWIST MY WORDS TO CREATE FAUX OUTRAGE, THATS A WEAK DEBATE TACTIC.

AS FAR AS JEWS INVOLVEMENT IN THE SLAVE TRADE, THEY WERE SIMPLY RESPONSIBLS FOR THE MONEY. IF THE BANK LENDS YOU MONEY AND U USE THAT MONEY TO GO TO THE MALE STRIP CLUB AND CATCH AIDS, THAT DOESNT MEAN THE BANK IS RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR AIDS.

I UNDERSTAND U BADLY WANT TO HATE JEWS, BUT MOST OF YOUR TALKING POINTS HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED LONG AGO. YOU CHOOSE TO READ ANTI-JEWISH WRITING AS OPPOSED TO LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH...

Some observers acknowledge that certain communities of Jews participated directly in black slavery -- but in far smaller numbers than non-Jews among the Portuguese, Dutch, English and French, than Arabs, or than Africans themselves. To focus on the role of Jews, they say, is gratuitous at best, antisemitic at worst. But to a few critics, even mentioning Jews and the slave trade is hateful and bigoted. Jews were not significantly involved, they claim -- contrary to the scholarly record, much of it compiled by historians who are Jewish.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...3741418/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d392aca48bfa



DO BETTER

Agenda - for WHAT? Who are the so-called Jews to care about that much to have an "agenda." Stop the fake news. I am just telling you the truth. With sources.

No - they haven't -- if they were fake debunked -- it was by so-called Jewish writers. No one else. And again -- I am listing JEWISH SCHOLARS and Historians.. -- and sources.

And - no I don't "hate the Jews" -- criticism -- and helping you learn the truth - is not HATE. It's educational. That game doesn't work. Sorry :smile:

Yeah -- post the Washington Post -- and David Mills - may he rest in peace --is a writer/journalist - not a historian. And did you read the article -- nothing is "debunked" -- what is stated is:

Why are so many people ignorant of such a well-documented point of history? One reason is that popular histories of New World slavery tend to omit any mention of Sephardic Jews while cataloging the activities of many other ethnic communities. In "The Rise and Fall of Black Slavery," C. Duncan Rice mentions the "Dutch refugees" who established the sugar industry in Barbados, and the "planters of Dutch Surinam" who, "with characteristic Flemish practicality," started up a sugar colony with a full force of black slaves. But he does not mention the Portuguese Jews among these Dutch. James A. Rawley's "The Transatlantic Slave Trade" has not a single mention over the course of 452 pages of the involvement of Sephardic Jews.

The holes in the popular record have led to misunderstanding. In a 1991 article in the Jewish monthly Midstream, headlined "An Old/New Libel: Jews in the Slave Trade," historian Saul Friedman noted that "Jews are remarkably absent from major texts" on New World slavery and cited seven history books by name. For Friedman, this constitutes proof that the role of Jews was negligible. Actually, he merely demonstrates the inadequacies of such "major texts."

It is necessary to consider this vacuum of common knowledge when analyzing how some blacks are trying to make political hay out of this complex history. If the popular record weren't incomplete -- that is, if everyone already knew that Sephardic merchants and planters had played a small but significant role in the New World slave trade -- there would be no "secret" relationship for Leonard Jeffries and Louis Farrakhan to exploit.
And it was both Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews - cause I myself have over 5% Ashkenazi DNA -- and my family are not down with IR - on either side.
 
Last edited:
Top