The collateral damage shyt is still the dumbest argument ever.
It happens in every comic book film. But nobody has ever cared until man of steel. And haven't cared since
^trash opinion. Superman is facing a warrior kryptonian in what is Clark's first encounter. He didn't "take" the fight anywhere. It was about survival and it was very much about protecting the planet, Clark damn near dies trying to stop the terraformer and not to mention there are plenty of scenes with him saving people throughout the entire movie. The oil rig, the school bus full of kids, etc.
We've been over this a hundred times and these fools still don't get it. Where was this narrative when Tony Stark fought Hulk in the middle of a populated area. nikka ran right at him and glass rained down on the citizens
Where was this narrative then?
They covered that in the original superman zod fight,
somehow in man of the steel the city is just magically empty lmao, you see superman saving citizens and he took the battle to a different location when he realized it was getting out of hand
you can't excuse bad writing
plus the man of steel was a rip off of agent smith v.s. neo
superman don't even use freeze breath in both movies lmao
They turned heat vision into cyclops optic blast lmao, them movies are trash