What side are you on, you're confusing me.so superman wants to be superman because he needs to stop zod from destroying earth?
that is the depth of the main character's motivations?
I'm guess them shytty xmen movies hot the spot
What side are you on, you're confusing me.so superman wants to be superman because he needs to stop zod from destroying earth?
that is the depth of the main character's motivations?
I'm on the side that didn't like MOS.What side are you on, you're confusing me.
I'm guess them shytty xmen movies hot the spot
Not by something man made.So they can't be hurt then? Wow stakes are real high in a Superman movie
This logic is why Marvel got away with an angry Thor hitting Captain America's shield and Cap not being obliterated. Or Ironman being able to hold his own with Thor. Thor is God status but he's nerfed to make the situations plausible. But in this very thread y'all nikkas want to complain about heroes staying true to the source material. "This is the way Superman is supposed to be" Which would mean him being so powerful and able to withstand a nuke is exactly what you would expect. Except that's what your complaining about. But It's Gucci when Ant-man is reduced to a jokester, Thor is no where near as powerful as he's supposed to be, the Ancient One is portrayed by a fukking white woman, The Mandarin is a member of the Screen Actor's Guild, milly rocking is capable of beating a villain wielding a fukking Infinity Gem. Is it Oochie Wally or is it One Mic with y'all? Pick a stance and stay consistent. Other wise, don't expect to be taken seriously
His motivation was clear as day. He wanted to be a for the planet but he didn't want to be outted, at least not yet because Pa Kent wanted it that way and knew that the world wasn't ready to handle it. Clark wanted to be a savior, a hero from day one. They even show him parading around in a fake cape as a kid.
Funny you bring that up because to me that was the weirdest and most outright dumbest thing in the entire movie. If Superman is the first cape wearing superhero then who tf is he emulating?
Knights wore capes. Thank you for exposing your stupidity.
So young Clark is emulating a knight?
I know you don't believe that. Did knights also strike the hands on hips Superman pose as well?
I missed this earlierThis logic is why Marvel got away with an angry Thor hitting Captain America's shield and Cap not being obliterated. Or Ironman being able to hold his own with Thor. Thor is God status but he's nerfed to make the situations plausible. But in this very thread y'all nikkas want to complain about heroes staying true to the source material. "This is the way Superman is supposed to be" Which would mean him being so powerful and able to withstand a nuke is exactly what you would expect. Except that's what your complaining about. But It's Gucci when Ant-man is reduced to a jokester, Thor is no where near as powerful as he's supposed to be, the Ancient One is portrayed by a fukking white woman, The Mandarin is a member of the Screen Actor's Guild, milly rocking is capable of beating a villain wielding a fukking Infinity Gem. Is it Oochie Wally or is it One Mic with y'all? Pick a stance and stay consistent. Other wise, don't expect to be taken seriously
Show me one where they did. Or better yet tell me why this thread was made?oh word? Show me a statistic where the majority didn't like it