They're so preoccupied with being some sort of voice of the zeitgeist or some shyt that it detracts from their reviews almost every time
There's nothing wrong with being articulate and verbose, but when the actual criticisms are shaky and based on the identity politics and branding surrounding that artist, they lose credibility.
They can't seem to detach identity from music. Every review starts with the reviewer giving you some historical context or essentially "reviewing" their career.
Look, it's not as cool to like Lupe Fiasco in 2018 as it is Cardi B or Playboi Carti, everyone knows that. I'm not listening to get clout or remind people how informed or current I am. I fukk with the bars, beats and content on here HEAVY. I like seeing someone who is a master of his craft, deliver the album that his fans wanted.
For a publication that promotes intellectualism and equal rights so heavy in their content, they're dedicated to validating the most vapid, brainless and anti-intellectual Hip Hop... Almost as if that's what they think Hip Hop should be. Low effort, microwave, turn up shyt etc
This review is the perspective of someone who made it very clear that Lupe is past his prime and guilty until proven innocent. fukk that
another thing that needs to be said regarding reviews and context
A mumble rappers 8.5 or 8 on a 1/10 scale isn’t not equal to a traditional MC’s 8 or 8.5
When I throw on Trippie’s album or X’d album and I hear a 8/8.5 that isn’t the same 8.5 that I hear after listening to Joey Bad’s album
Hip hop is growing so fast, and these boundaries haven’t been established so the lines are so blurry